Effect of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Fibromyalgia Clinical Trial

— TSMFS-FMS  

Official title:

Effect of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation Over the Primary Motor Cortex in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04836325
• Other study ID #: JJJimenez-Rejano, USeville
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 19, 2021
• Est. completion date: November 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: June 2022
• Source: University of Seville
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The main objective is to know if the transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) reduces the perception of pain in patients with fibromyalgia and its effect on health-related quality of life. In addition, it will seek to limit the parameters necessary to achieve efficiency with the technique.

Description:

Background: Various non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been successfully tested in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) is a new, portable and inexpensive non invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique that has shown security, biological effects, and therapeutical effects in some pathologies. Some studies have studied its effect in pain central processing, our aim is to study its effect on FMS. The safety that tSMS has demonstrated in several clinical trials opens doors to future clinical trials that will extend its clinical utility. Objectives: To investigate the effect of tSMS on pain in patients with FMS, using subjective and objective assessment measures. Identify dose response to the treatment to limit the parameters required to achieve effectiveness with the technique.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 16
• Est. completion date: November 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: October 31, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Formal diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
• No change in the last 4 weeks on their standard treatment.
• They must have pain for more than 6 months (at least 4 on the VAS scale).
• Score on the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ) greater than 39.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Presence of concomitant autoimmune or hematologic diseases.
• Neuropsychiatric disorders.
• Pacemakers or neurostimulators implants.
• Substance abuse or other pathologies that can explain chronic pain.
• Pregnant or lactating women.
• Those who are receiving any other type of physiotherapy treatment.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fibromyalgia
• Myofascial Pain Syndromes

Intervention

Procedure:
• transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS)
The intervention group will receive a treatment of tSMS in the primary motor cortex.
• Sham transcranial static magnetic field stimulation
The placebo group will receive a dummy treatment

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Grupo de Investigación Área de Fisioterapia CTS 305 - Universidad de Sevilla	Sevilla

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Seville

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (21)

Capone F, Dileone M, Profice P, Pilato F, Musumeci G, Minicuci G, Ranieri F, Cadossi R, Setti S, Tonali PA, Di Lazzaro V. Does exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields produce functional changes in human brain? J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2009 Ma — View Citation

Capone F, Pellegrino G, Motolese F, Rossi M, Musumeci G, Di Lazzaro V. Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields Do Not Affect LTP-Like Plasticity in Healthy Humans. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Feb 5;14:14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00014. eCollection 2020. — View Citation

Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Pilato F, Saturno E, Dileone M, Mazzone P, Insola A, Tonali PA, Rothwell JC. The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;115(2):255-66. Review. — View Citation

Dileone M, Mordillo-Mateos L, Oliviero A, Foffani G. Long-lasting effects of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul - Aug;11(4):676-688. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 7. — View Citation

Eich W, Bär KJ, Bernateck M, Burgmer M, Dexl C, Petzke F, Sommer C, Winkelmann A, Häuser W. [Definition, classification, clinical diagnosis and prognosis of fibromyalgia syndrome : Updated guidelines 2017 and overview of systematic review articles]. Schme — View Citation

Gentile E, Ricci K, Delussi M, Brighina F, de Tommaso M. Motor Cortex Function in Fibromyalgia: A Study by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Pain Res Treat. 2019 Jan 16;2019:2623161. doi: 10.1155/2019/2623161. eCollection 2019. — View Citation

Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, Quartarone A, Cohen LG, Mall V, Kaelin-Lang A, Mima T, Rossi S, Thickbroom GW, Rossini PM, Ziemann U, Valls-Solé J, Siebner HR. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. — View Citation

Kirimoto H, Asao A, Tamaki H, Onishi H. Non-invasive modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials by the application of static magnetic fields over the primary and supplementary motor cortices. Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 4;6:34509. doi: 10.1038/srep34509. — View Citation

Kirimoto H, Tamaki H, Matsumoto T, Sugawara K, Suzuki M, Oyama M, Onishi H. Effect of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation over the sensorimotor cortex on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Brain Stimul. 2014 Nov-Dec;7(6):836-40. doi: 10 — View Citation

Kirimoto H, Tamaki H, Otsuru N, Yamashiro K, Onishi H, Nojima I, Oliviero A. Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation over the Primary Motor Cortex Induces Plastic Changes in Cortical Nociceptive Processing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 15;12:63. do — View Citation

Knijnik LM, Dussán-Sarria JA, Rozisky JR, Torres IL, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Caumo W. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Pract. 2016 Mar;16(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/papr.12276. Epub 2015 — View Citation

Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Lar — View Citation

Lloyd DM, Wittkopf PG, Arendsen LJ, Jones AKP. Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effective for the Treatment of Pain in Fibromyalgia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2020 Nov - Dec;21(11-12):1085-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2 — View Citation

Oliviero A, Carrasco-López MC, Campolo M, Perez-Borrego YA, Soto-León V, Gonzalez-Rosa JJ, Higuero AM, Strange BA, Abad-Rodriguez J, Foffani G. Safety Study of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation (tSMS) of the Human Cortex. Brain Stimul. 2015 M — View Citation

Oliviero A, Mordillo-Mateos L, Arias P, Panyavin I, Foffani G, Aguilar J. Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2011 Oct 15;589(Pt 20):4949-58. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.211953. Epub 2011 Aug 1. — View Citation

Paolucci T, Piccinini G, Iosa M, Piermattei C, de Angelis S, Grasso MR, Zangrando F, Saraceni VM. Efficacy of extremely low-frequency magnetic field in fibromyalgia pain: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(6):1023-1034. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.04.00 — View Citation

Serra J, Collado A, Solà R, Antonelli F, Torres X, Salgueiro M, Quiles C, Bostock H. Hyperexcitable C nociceptors in fibromyalgia. Ann Neurol. 2014 Feb;75(2):196-208. doi: 10.1002/ana.24065. Epub 2014 Feb 12. — View Citation

Shibata S, Watanabe T, Yukawa Y, Minakuchi M, Shimomura R, Mima T. Effect of transcranial static magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in the contralateral primary motor cortex. Neurosci Lett. 2020 Apr 1;723:134871. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020 — View Citation

Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RS, Mease P, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Winfield JB. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteri — View Citation

Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Winfield JB, Yunus MB. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Re — View Citation

Wolfe F, Walitt B. Culture, science and the changing nature of fibromyalgia. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013 Dec;9(12):751-5. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.96. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 21 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change from Self-reported pain intensity	Self-reported pain intensity evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).	At the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Primary	Change from Self-reported quality of life	Self-reported quality of life evaluated by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ).	At the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Secondary	Change from Self-reported catastrophizing	Self-reported catastrophizing evaluated by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: 13 items, using the 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale. A total score is yielded (ranging from 0-52), the worse the result the higher the score.	At the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Secondary	Change from Confidence in the treatment	Confidence in the treatment evaluated by the Patient Global Impression of Change.	After the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Secondary	Change from Global health	Self-reported Global health evaluated by the Short form-36 (SF-36).	At the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Secondary	Change from Cognitive impairment	Cognitive impairment evaluated by the Multidimensional Inventory of Subjective Cognitive Impairment.	At the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Secondary	Change from Depression	Depression Evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: 14 items, 7 for depression and 7 for anxiety. Each item had been answered by the patient on a four-point (0-3) response category so the possible scores ranged from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression, the worse the result the higher the score.	At the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Secondary	Change from Sleep	Change from Sleep evaluated by the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale:12 Likert-type items with 6 degrees of response (from 1-always to 6-never). For its interpretation, a gross estimate of the amount of sleep is obtained (item 2) and scores in the different subscales. The direct scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100, with no cut-off points; the higher the score, the greater the intensity of the concept evaluated.	At the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)
Secondary	Change from Physical activity	Change from Physical activity evaluated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.	After the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)