Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01271933
Other study ID # A0081245
Secondary ID FIBROMYALGIA
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date March 2011
Est. completion date July 2012

Study information

Verified date August 2018
Source Pfizer
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a controlled release formulation of pregabalin administered once daily as compared to placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia. All patients will receive pregabalin; half of the patients will receive placebo at some point in the study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 441
Est. completion date July 2012
Est. primary completion date July 2012
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must have fibromyalgia. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with other painful conditions cannot participate.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
pregabalin
controlled release tablet; 165-495 mg/day; given once daily
placebo
matching placebo tablet; given once daily

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Clinique Medicale Nepisiguit Bathurst New Brunswick
Canada Maritime Research Center Bathurst New Brunswick
Canada Tri-Hospital Sleep Laboratory West Mississauga Ontario
Canada Dr. Alexander McIntyre Inc. Penticton British Columbia
Canada West Island Rheumatology Research Associates Pointe Claire Quebec
Canada Groupe de Recherche en Rhumatologie et Maladie Osseuses (GRMO Inc.) Quebec
Canada Diex Research Sherbrooke Inc. Sherbrooke Quebec
Canada Canadian Phase Onward Inc. Toronto Ontario
Canada Sleep & Alertness Research Inc. Toronto Ontario
Canada Rivergrove Medical Clinic Winnipeg Manitoba
India Chanre Rheumatology & Immunology Center & Research Bangalore Karnataka
India Mahavir Hospital & Research Centre Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh
India Department of Rheumatology Lucknow Uttar Pradesh
India Punjab Rheumatology Centre Ludhiana Punjab
India Indian Spinal Injuries Centre New Delhi
India Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre Pune Maharashtra
India Sahyadri Clinical Research & Development Center, Pune Maharashtra
India Sahyadri Speciality Hospital Pune Maharashtra
Taiwan Chang-Hua Christian Hospital Changhua
Taiwan Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Linkou Branch Kwei Shan Town Taoyuan County
Taiwan China Medical University Hospital Taichung
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei
United States Albuquerque Neuroscience, Incorporated Albuquerque New Mexico
United States Allegheny Pain Management Altoona Pennsylvania
United States FutureSearch Trials of Neurology Austin Texas
United States East Penn RheumatologyAssociates, P.C. Bethlehem Pennsylvania
United States Boston Clinical Trials Boston Massachusetts
United States Beacon Clinical Research, LLC Brockton Massachusetts
United States Social Psychiatry Research Institute Brooklyn New York
United States Charlottesville Medical Research Charlottesville Virginia
United States University of Cincinnati Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio
United States Radiant Research, Columbus Ohio
United States Midwest Clinical Research Center Dayton Ohio
United States Davis Clinic, Inc Indianapolis Indiana
United States The Center for Pharmaceutical Research, PC Kansas City Missouri
United States R/D Clinical Research, Inc. Lake Jackson Texas
United States AB Clinical Trials Las Vegas Nevada
United States Central Kentucky Research Associates, Inc. Lexington Kentucky
United States Commonwealth Biomedical Research, LLC Madisonville Kentucky
United States Sunstone Medical Research, LLC Medford Oregon
United States Trinity Health Organization Minot North Dakota
United States Arthritis Care Center Moline Illinois
United States Clinical Research Associates, Inc. Nashville Tennessee
United States Paddock Park Clinical Research Ocala Florida
United States Quality Clinical Research, Inc. Omaha Nebraska
United States Andrew O. Schreiber, MD Orange California
United States Broward Research Group Pembroke Pines Florida
United States Mercy Health Research Saint Louis Missouri
United States Fatigue Consultation Clinic Salt Lake City Utah
United States Apex Research Institute Santa Ana California
United States Tacoma Center for Arthritis Research, PS Tacoma Washington
United States Meridien Research Tampa Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada,  India,  Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Total Sleep Time at Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Total sleep time = number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening. Baseline, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Other Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Minutes of Interrupted Sleep at Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Minutes of interrupted sleep = minutes awake after sleep onset (analogous to wake-time after sleep onset from polysomnography measurements). Baseline, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Other Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline at in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Sleep Fragmentation Index Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Sleep fragmentation index = a measure of sleep relatedness. Sleep fragmentation index calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. Baseline, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Other Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Total Daytime Activity at Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Total daytime activity = total activity "counts" during the day. Baseline, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Other Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Percent Sedentary at Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Percent sedentary = percent of daytime spent in sedentary activities as determined by the activity counts measured each minute. Baseline, Weeks 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Total Sleep Time at Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Total sleep time = number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening. Baseline, Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Minutes of Interrupted Sleep at Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Minutes of interrupted sleep = minutes awake after sleep onset (analogous to wake-time after sleep onset from polysomnography measurements). Baseline, Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Sleep Fragmentation Index at Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Sleep fragmentation index = a measure of sleep relatedness. Sleep fragmentation index calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. Baseline, Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Total Daytime Activity at Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Total daytime activity = total activity "counts" during the day. Baseline, Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Percent Sedentary at Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Percent sedentary = percent of daytime spent in sedentary activities as determined by the activity counts measured each minute. Baseline, Weeks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment- Total Sleep Time at Double Blind End Point Visit (Week 19) Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Total sleep time = number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening. Baseline, Double blind end point visit (Week 19)
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Minutes of Interrupted Sleep at Double Blind End Point Visit (Week 19) Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Minutes of interrupted sleep = minutes awake after sleep onset (analogous to wake-time after sleep onset from polysomnography measurements). Baseline, Double blind end point visit (Week 19)
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Sleep Fragmentation Index at Double Blind End Point Visit (Week 19) Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Sleep fragmentation index = a measure of sleep relatedness. Sleep fragmentation index calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. Baseline, Double blind end point visit (Week 19)
Other Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Percent Sedentary at Double Blind End Point Visit (Week 19) Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Percent sedentary = percent of daytime spent in sedentary activities as determined by the activity counts measured each minute. Baseline, Double blind end point visit (Week 19)
Other Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation Throughout the Study Assessed by Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) C-CASA was used to categorize and summarize results from the Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) and the Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). S-STS was an 8-item prospective rating scale that tracked treatment-emergent suicidal ideation and behaviors. Items 1a, 2 to 6, 7a, 8 were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (ranges 0 [not at all] to 4 [extremely]). Items 1, 1b, and 7 required yes or no responses. S-STS total score range 0-30. Lower score=reduced suicidal tendency. C-SSRS was a participant rated questionnaire to assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, actual attempts (yes or no responses), and intensity of ideation (rated 1=low severity to 5=high severity). Responses on S-STS or C-SSRS were mapped to C-CASA categories as: Completed suicide; suicide attempt; preparatory acts; suicide ideation; self-injurious behavior, intent unknown; not enough information; self-injurious behavior, no suicide intent; other, no deliberate self harm. Week 1 to Week 7 and Week 11 to Week 20
Primary Double-Blind Phase: Time to Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) The time to loss of therapeutic response (LTR) is the time to loss of pain response (<30% pain response relative to the single-blind (SB) baseline mean pain) or withdrawal due to lack of efficacy or adverse events (in the double blind phase). Randomization to Week 19
Primary Double-Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Loss of Therapeutic Response (LTR) Event Participants who did not maintain at least 30% pain response during the DB phase relative to baseline or were discontinued during DB due to lack of efficacy or an adverse event were considered to have a loss of therapeutic response. Randomization to Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Pain Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Daily Pain Score: Day 1 pain intensity over past 24 hours recorded on waking every morning. 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS): 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Pain Score at Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 Daily Pain Score: Day 1 pain intensity over past 24 hours recorded on waking every morning. 0-10 NRS: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline, Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Pain Score at Double Blind Endpoint Visit Daily Pain Score: Day 1 pain intensity over past 24 hours recorded on waking every morning. 0-10 NRS: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline, Double blind endpoint visit (Week 19)
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Daily Tiredness Score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The tiredness assessment in the daily interactive voice response system (IVRS) diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from zero (not tired) to 10 (extremely tired). Participants rate their tiredness due to fibromyalgia during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 (not tired) and 10 (extremely tired). Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Daily Tiredness Score at Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The tiredness assessment in the daily IVRS diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from zero (not tired) to 10 (extremely tired). Participants rate their tiredness due to fibromyalgia during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 (not tired) and 10 (extremely tired). Baseline, Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Daily Tiredness Score at Double Blind Endpoint Visit The tiredness assessment in the daily IVRS diary consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from zero (not tired) to 10 (extremely tired). Participants rate their tiredness due to fibromyalgia during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 (not tired) and 10 (extremely tired). Baseline, Double blind endpoint visit (Week 19)
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Subjective Wake After Sleep and Subjective Latency to Sleep Onset at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily SSQ - Subjective Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily SSQ - Subjective Total Sleep Time at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Sleep Quality at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Participants rated quality of sleep during the past night by selecting a number between 0 (very poor) and 10 (excellent). Mean sleep quality was calculated as the mean of the last seven days, the potential range of responses at each week was therefore 0 (very poor) -10 (excellent), where higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Subjective Wake After Sleep Onset and Subjective Latency to Sleep Onset at Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Subjective Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset at Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Subjective Total Sleep Time at Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Subjective total sleep time was the subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening. Baseline, Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Sleep Quality at Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Participants rated quality of sleep during the past night by selecting a number between 0 (very poor) and 10 (excellent). Mean sleep quality was calculated as the mean of the last seven days, the potential range of responses at each week was therefore 0 (very poor) -10 (excellent), where higher scores indicated better quality of sleep. Baseline, Weeks 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Subjective Wake After Sleep Onset and Subjective Latency to Sleep Onset at Double Blind Endpoint Visit The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Double blind endpoint visit (Week 19)
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Subjective Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset at Double Blind Endpoint Visit The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Double blind endpoint visit (Week 19)
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Subjective Total Sleep Time at Double Blind Endpoint Visit The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Baseline, Double blind endpoint visit (Week 19)
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) - Sleep Quality at Double Blind Endpoint Visit The SSQ is designed to capture subjective behavior in participants with disrupted sleep. Participants report latency (how long it took them to fall asleep), how many hours they slept, the number of times they woke up, the total wake time after sleep onset, and then rate the quality of their sleep (NRS) for the previous night. Participants rated quality of sleep during the past night by selecting a number between 0 (very poor) and 10 (excellent). Baseline, Double blind endpoint visit (Week 19)
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Weekly Pain Score at Week 6 (1 Week Recall Period) Weekly pain scores were calculated from the daily pain diary. Daily Pain Score: Day 1 pain intensity over past 24 hours recorded on waking every morning. 0-10 NRS: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Weekly Pain Score at Week 19 (1 Week Recall Period) Weekly pain scores were calculated from the daily pain diary. Daily Pain Score: Day 1 pain intensity over past 24 hours recorded on waking every morning. 0-10 NRS: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 6 - Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Awakening Short of Breath or With a Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Somnolence, Sleep Problems Index I and Sleep Problems Index II The MOS-SS is a validated self-administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) and two overall sleep problems indices assessing sleep over the past week. Score range for Sleep Disturbance (SD), sleep adequacy (SA), snoring, somnolence, awakening short of breath/headache was 0-100, where higher score=greater SD; greater SA; greater snoring; greater somnolence; greater shortness of breath/headache respectively. Quantity of Sleep (range-0 to 24 hours; higher scores/hours=greater quantity of sleep). Sleep Problem Index I and II: Score Range=0 to 100; higher scores =greater sleep problems. Optimal Sleep (assessed as yes or no), 'Yes' =optimal sleep (average 7-8 hours/night); 'No' =not optimal sleep. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 6- Quantity of Sleep The MOS-SS is a validated self-administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) and two overall sleep problems indices assessing sleep over the past week. Score range for Sleep Disturbance (SD), sleep adequacy (SA), snoring, somnolence, awakening short of breath/headache was 0-100, where higher score=greater SD; greater SA; greater snoring; greater somnolence; greater shortness of breath/headache respectively. Quantity of Sleep (range-0 to 24 hours; higher scores/hours=greater quantity of sleep). Sleep Problem Index I and II: Score Range=0 to 100; higher scores =greater sleep problems. Optimal Sleep (assessed as yes or no), 'Yes' =optimal sleep (average 7-8 hours/night); 'No' =not optimal sleep. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 19-Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Awakening Short of Breath or With a Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Somnolence, Sleep Problems Index I and Sleep Problems Index II The MOS-SS is a validated self-administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) and two overall sleep problems indices assessing sleep over the past week. Score range for Sleep Disturbance (SD), sleep adequacy (SA), snoring, somnolence, awakening short of breath/headache was 0-100, where higher score=greater SD; greater SA; greater snoring; greater somnolence; greater shortness of breath/headache respectively. Quantity of Sleep (range-0 to 24 hours; higher scores/hours=greater quantity of sleep). Sleep Problem Index I and II: Score Range=0 to 100; higher scores =greater sleep problems. Optimal Sleep (assessed as yes or no), 'Yes' =optimal sleep (average 7-8 hours/night); 'No' =not optimal sleep. Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 19- Quantity of Sleep The MOS-SS is a validated self-administered questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep. Instrument scoring yields 7 subscales (sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with a headache, quantity of sleep, optimal sleep, sleep adequacy, and somnolence) and two overall sleep problems indices assessing sleep over the past week. Score range for Sleep Disturbance (SD), sleep adequacy (SA), snoring, somnolence, awakening short of breath/headache was 0-100, where higher score=greater SD; greater SA; greater snoring; greater somnolence; greater shortness of breath/headache respectively. Quantity of Sleep (range-0 to 24 hours; higher scores/hours=greater quantity of sleep). Sleep Problem Index I and II: Score Range=0 to 100; higher scores =greater sleep problems. Optimal Sleep (assessed as yes or no), 'Yes' =optimal sleep (average 7-8 hours/night); 'No' =not optimal sleep. Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Number of Participants Who Reported Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 6 PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Number of Participants Who Reported Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 19 PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 6 SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100. Higher scores indicated a better health-related quality of life. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in SF-36 Score at Week 19 SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100. Higher scores indicated a better health-related quality of life. Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 6 HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in HADS Score at Week 19 HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Week 6 The FIQ is a 20-item self-administered questionnaire. FIQ contains 10 subscales, which are combined to yield a total score. There are 11 questions that are related specifically to physical functioning (item 1). The remaining questions assess pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiousness and depression. The FIQ is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more impairment. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in FIQ Score at Week 19 The FIQ is a 20-item self-administered questionnaire. FIQ contains 10 subscales, which are combined to yield a total score. There are 11 questions that are related specifically to physical functioning (item 1). The remaining questions assess pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiousness and depression. The FIQ is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more impairment. Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) at Week 6 The MFI is a 20-item, self-administered questionnaire designed to measure the following dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. Items are summed to form subscale scores; there is no overall score. The score range is from 4 to 20, where higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in MFI Score at Week 19 The MFI is a 20-item, self-administered questionnaire designed to measure the following dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. Items are summed to form subscale scores; there is no overall score. The score range is from 4 to 20, where higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Benefit, Satisfaction, Willingness to Continue Measure (BSW) at Week 6 The questionnaire consists of 3 single-item measures designed to captures the participant's perception of the effect of treatment in terms of the relative benefit, their satisfaction, and their intention or willingness to continue on therapy. Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Number of Participants With Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness (BSW) to Continue Data at Visit 9 (3 Component Questions) at Week 19 The questionnaire consists of 3 single-item measures designed to captures the participant's perception of the effect of treatment in terms of the relative benefit, their satisfaction, and their intention or willingness to continue on therapy. Week 19
Secondary Single-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire at Week 6 WPAI: 6 question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which disease state affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. Subscale scores include percent work time missed due to the health problem; percent impairment while working due to problem; percent overall work impairment due to problem; and percent activity impairment due to problem. Scores scaled as 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired). Higher scores indicated greater impairment and less productivity. Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline WPAI Questionnaire at Week 19 WPAI: 6 question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which disease state affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. Subscale scores include percent work time missed due to the health problem; percent impairment while working due to problem; percent overall work impairment due to problem; and percent activity impairment due to problem. Scores scaled as 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired). Higher scores indicated greater impairment and less productivity. Baseline, Week 19
Secondary Double-Blind Phase: Change From Baseline in Actigraphy Functional/Sleep Assessment - Total Daytime Activity at Double Blind End Point Visit (Week 19) Actigraphy was assessed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist. The accelerometer was programmed to record movements. This information was used to calculate several endpoints reflecting daytime activity, and sleep quality and duration. Total daytime activity = total activity "counts" during the day. Baseline, Double blind end point visit (Week 19)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05659862 - Digitally Assisted Behavioral Physical Activity Intervention in Fibromyalgia N/A
Recruiting NCT03207828 - Testing Interventions for Patients With Fibromyalgia and Depression N/A
Completed NCT03042728 - Impact of Inclusion of a Therapy Dog Visit as Part of the Fibromyalgia Treatment Program N/A
Recruiting NCT06097091 - Effects and Mechanisms of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients With Fibromyalgia N/A
Recruiting NCT04554784 - Effectiveness of Bowen Therapy for Pain Management in Patients With Fibromyalgia N/A
Completed NCT03300635 - Metabolism, Muscle Function and Psychological Factors in Fibromyalgia N/A
Recruiting NCT06166563 - Exercise, Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Fibromyalgia N/A
Completed NCT03166995 - Postural Exercises in Women With Fibromyalgia N/A
Completed NCT03227952 - Sensory Stimulation in Fibromyalgia N/A
Recruiting NCT06237595 - Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Fibromyalgia N/A
Completed NCT01888640 - Fibromyalgia Activity Study With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (FAST) N/A
Completed NCT03641495 - Pain Education and Therapeutic Exercise for Fibromyalgia N/A
Recruiting NCT05581628 - FREQUENCY OF FIBROMYALGIA IN PATIENTS WITH CELIAC DISEASE
Active, not recruiting NCT05128162 - Open-label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Psilocybin With Psychotherapy in Adult Participants With Fibromyalgia Phase 2
Completed NCT04674878 - Comparison of Muscle Energy Techniques and Breathing Exercises for Functional Improvement in Fibromyalgia N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04084795 - Augmentation of EMDR With tDCS in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia N/A
Completed NCT03129906 - Impact of the Restriction of Sources of Gluten in Fibromyalgia Patients N/A
Completed NCT05058911 - Exposure-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs Traditional Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Fibromyalgia N/A
Recruiting NCT04571528 - Effectiveness of VIRTUAL FIBROWALK STUDY N/A
Recruiting NCT04571853 - New Educational Tool for FM N/A