View clinical trials related to Fibroid Uterus.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a comprehensive approach to anesthesia in patients with uterine myoma using pre-incisional infiltration of the anterior abdominal wall and presacral blockade of the hypogastric nerve plexus during laparoscopic myomectomy
This study aims to investigate the efficacy of temporary clipping of the uterine artery and utero-ovarian ligament during robotically assisted myomectomy (RAM) for uterine fibroids. While RAM is increasingly used for myomectomy, bleeding control remains challenging. Temporary clipping of arteries has shown promise in conventional laparoscopy but has not been studied in RAM. This randomized controlled trial will assess primary endpoints such as estimated blood loss, need for transfusion, and hemoglobin drop, alongside secondary outcomes like complication rates and operation time.
The PLUM Study is a randomized, double-blinded, 2-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial is designed to compare the efficacy of letrozole versus placebo on leiomyoma-related symptoms and quality of life as well as leiomyoma and uterine size.
This study aims to determine the efficacy of a quadratus lumborum (QL) block in decreasing postoperative pain in patients undergoing myomectomy for uterine fibroids. A QL block is a temporary anesthetic injection in the quadratus lumborum muscle, a muscle in the lower back, that has been previously shown to significantly reduce postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery. Because of its demonstrated effects, the QL block is becoming a standard of anesthesia and surgical care. Since participants will be undergoing a myomectomy procedure, the investigators believe that participants may qualify to participate in this study. The investigators will be comparing patients who receive the QL block (in addition to standard anesthesia and postoperative pain care) with patients who do not receive the QL block (in addition to standard care). The participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups and may or may not actually receive the block.
Rationale: 20-30% of women of reproductive age have leiomyomas, causing symptoms like dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain which both effect quality of life.[1-4] The natural behaviour of uterine fibroids is to grow between 7 to 84% in 3 to 12 months.[5-7] Non-surgical options to treat uterine fibroids are non-hormonal or hormonal medical therapies and minimally invasive interventional radiologic techniques. Exogenous hormone exposure including COC, POP or Mirena give in conflicting literature minimal growth to 60% volume shrinkage. [8, 9]] Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) eg. Esmya and GnRH-analogues intent to reduce fibroids volume after several months; GnRH-agonists provide a 31-63% shrinkage and less frequently applied GnRH-antagonists 14.3 - 42.7%.[10-16] Esmya gives a volume reduction varying between 10 to 48%.[17] Radiological technique like embolization decreases dominant fibroid volume with 40-70%.[1, 18-22] UAE fails in case of devascularized or minimal vascularized fibroids.[23] Ablation techniques show shrinkage up to a maximum of 90% depending e.g. which treatment.[24-41] Clear prognostic models to predict the effect on fibroid related symptoms and volume reduction are lacking. We postulate higher vascularity to be related to 1) larger fibroid growth during the natural course or during exogenous hormonal exposure; 2) more effective shrinkage during progestogens, GnRH-analogues, SPRM and UAE; but 3) less effective after ablation therapy. Objectives: To study the value of sonographic features including vascularity in the prediction of fibroids' volume change at follow-up during their (1) natural course or (2) long-term use of exogenous hormone exposure; after initiation of (3) SPRM or GnRH-analogues treatment or (4) exogenous hormonal exposure; or after (5) embolization or (6) ablation therapy. Study design: Observational cohort study during 5 years in the outpatient clinic. Patientselection: Women ≥18 years with 1 to 3 fibroids with a maximal diameter ≥ 3cm and ≤ 10cm diagnosed on ultrasound examination, planned for expectant or non-surgical management. Study objectives: The primary outcome is volume reduction after 3 to 12 month depending on the study group. The secondary outcome include UFS-QOL, EQ-5D score, PBAC, hemoglobin level, treatment failure rate and (re)intervention rate. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: No risks are associated with the participation of this observational study since the outcome measures include vaginal ultrasound, questionaires and a hemoglobin test. These measurements are also applied in daily practice, the burden for the patient is time. Extra in the context of the study are questionnaires which last a maximum of 5-15 minutes. The treatment considering the fibroid(s) is independent of this research.
The investigators hypothesized that Macrovascular Flow imaging could contribute to 2D power Doppler and 3D power Doppler in depicting fibroid vascularity. However, data concerning the feasibility and reproducibility of Macrovascular Flow imaging is lacking. Therefore the purpose of our study was to determine 1) the reproducibility of Macrovascular Flow imaging, 2) its correlation with 2D and 3D power Doppler, and 3) penetration depth, in order to investigate the added value for daily clinical practice.
The purpose of this research study is to determine if low-dose (i.e., a fraction of what is commonly used) carboprost (Hemabate) helps facilitate fibroid removal (myomectomy).
In this prospective cohort study, the patients who were diagnosed with either uterine fibroid (control group) or adenomyosis (study group), were examined with transvaginal ultrasound and shear wave elastography. Definitive diagnosis was established by pelvic MRI. Shear wave elastography data of both groups were compared. Features of adenomyosis on transvaginal ultrasound were also recorded for study group.
To determine if opioid consumption postoperatively among patients undergoing non-emergent laparotomy by the gynecologic oncology service who receive intrathecal morphine with intraoperative lidocaine (IML) infusion are lower than patients who have epidural anesthesia with PCA (EPCA).
This is a prospective cohort study comparing the novel FDA-approved oral GnRH antagonist ORIAHNN (elagolix, estradiol, and norethindrone acetate capsules; elagolix capsules) to uterine artery embolization (UAE) or myomectomy (abdominal, laparoscopic, or hysteroscopic) for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding due to leiomyomas. Uterine leiomyomas, also called fibroids, are hormone-dependent growths in the uterine muscle that are common in reproductive-age women (1). Leiomyomas can often lead to heavy menstrual bleeding. Definitive treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding due to leiomyomas is hysterectomy, but for patients who desire uterine conservation, a variety of treatment options exist. Regulation of menses with combined oral contraceptives or progestin only oral formulations are generally considered first line treatment but are not curative or effective for many patients. Another treatment option is a myomectomy, which is the surgical resection or removal of myomas. Myomectomy can be performed via hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, or by a vaginal or an abdominal approach. The route of removal depends on myoma location and patient symptoms. Another treatment option is Uterine fibroid or uterine artery embolization (UFE/UAE). UAE is a minimally invasive procedure where permanent particles are delivered to and block/embolize the blood supply to the myoma via a fluoroscopy directed arterial catheter. This typically leads to a decrease in fibroid size and associated bleeding (2). ORIAHNN, an oral GnRH antagonist that was FDA-approved in 2020, has demonstrated significant decrease in myoma-associated heavy menstrual bleeding compared to placebo (1) but has not been compared to other standard of care interventions. The primary objective of this study is to compare this novel medication to the common AUB-L treatments UAE and Myomectomy.