Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Clinical Trial
— FASSTOfficial title:
Attention Management Trial for Children With FASD - a N-of-1 Control Trial of Prescribed Stimulants for ADHD in FASD
This study is a double-blind, placebo controlled, series of N-of-1 trials of individualised stimulant dose on ADHD symptomatology in children with FASD. The broad aim of this study is to contribute new evidence towards understanding treatment efficacy for ADHD symptoms in FASD. Specific aims are: 1. To assess the ongoing effectiveness of stimulant medication prescribed for ADHD symptoms in individual children with FASD of clinically prescribed stimulant medication compared to placebo to control ADHD symptoms (using behavioural and cognitive measures) in children with FASD and ADHD using a N-of-1 trial design. 2. To obtain pilot data to examine feasibility and tolerability of the planned N-of-1 trial design in children with FASD and ADHD for future and larger studies that might seek to examine if the different stimulant types are equally effective relative to placebo. 3. To review the multiple N-of-1 data to analyze key individual factors that mediate the effect of stimulants relative to placebo on ADHD symptoms, including underlying child factors (attention skills, cognitive function), sociodemographic factors and other prenatal exposures.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | July 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 4 Years to 18 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Each patient must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled in this trial: - Is between the ages of 4 - 18 years at the time of randomization. - Meet diagnostic criteria for FASD or at risk of FASD according to the Australian Guide to the diagnosis of FASD. - Is a patient of VicFAS or Developmental Paediatrics (Monash Health). - Has a diagnosis of ADHD according to the DMS-IV criteria. - Be on a stimulant medication for treatment of ADHD symptoms. - Be on a stimulant medication as a primary treatment for ADHD. - Be on a stable dose of stimulant medication for at last 1 month prior to the study. - Provide a signed and dated informed consent form / and has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf. - If seen by VicFAS/Developmental paediatrics between August 2019 - study commencement date), parent/guardian must have provided verbal or written consent to the VicFAS database PICF and selected 'yes' to the optional consent for contact for 'future research'. Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria will include any of the following: - Inability to read or speak sufficient English for either child or parent/guardian to complete assessment tasks. - Be on a medication for treatment of ADHD symptoms that is a medication other than stimulants as a primary treatment for ADHD. - Allergy/sensitivity to Starcke 1500 (Maize Starch and Pregelatinised Maize Starch). - Unable to swallow capsules. - Intracranial symptoms or pathology such as epilepsy, hydrocephalus, diagnosed traumatic. brain injury or progressive intracranial tumours that may impact cognitive and behavioural function (children with asymptomatic or static lesions will be eligible). - An abnormal ECG result at the time of screening deemed clinically significant by study physician. - Presence of a significant comorbid psychiatric or psychological (excluding ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder and pervasive development disorder/autism spectrum disorder) including depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder, suicidality, Tic disorder, anorexia or bulimia nervosa - Has a known hypersensitivity to starch or other compound relevant to placebo/capsules. - Has had treatment with any other investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to randomisation. - If the participant is known to be pregnant, they cannot take part in this research project. - Parent/guardian not consenting to contact with paediatrician or school. - Is deemed by their treating paediatrician to be medically unsafe for trial participation. - Child's school unwilling to participate in outcome assessments. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Monash Health | Clayton | Victoria |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Monash Medical Centre | Monash University |
Australia,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Rate of change of prescribed stimulant | Participant's paediatrician will rate any change in medication practice, immediately post-trial. This will capture the rate of this change in medication as a result of the N-of-1 trial data over the whole study. | End of trial (8 weeks) | |
Other | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder subtype classification | Conners 3 parent and teacher ratings will be used to classify child ADHD subtype (ADHD inattentive type, ADHD Hyperactive-Impulsive type, ADHD Combined type) according to DMS related symptom count cut-offs (At least 6 out of 9 symptoms) for each subtype or combined type. | Baseline | |
Other | Attention factor 1 (selective) | The Tea-Ch measures four factors of child attention. Selective, or focused attention will be measures using the Sky Search task. This measure provides both raw score and scaled scores for each of the subtests. We will use age and gender based scaled scores for selective attention outcome. Scaled scores have a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. A lower score indicates greater impairment in the attentional factor. | Baseline | |
Other | Attention factor 2 (sustained) | The Tea-Ch measures four factors of child attention. Sustained attention will be measures using the Score! task. This measure provides both raw score and scaled scores for each of the subtests. We will use age and gender based scaled scores for sustained attention outcome. Scaled scores have a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. A lower score indicates greater impairment in the attentional factor. | Baseline | |
Other | Attention factor 3 (divided) | The Tea-Ch measures four factors of child attention. Switching attention will be measures using the Sky Search DT task. This measure provides both raw score and scaled scores for each of the subtests. We will use age and gender based scaled scores for divided attention outcome. Scaled scores have a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. A lower score indicates greater impairment in the attentional factor. | Baseline | |
Other | Attention factor 4 (alternating) | The Tea-Ch measures four factors of child attention. Alternating attention (i.e. switching focus from one stimuli to another) will be measures using the Creature counting task. This measure provides both raw score and scaled scores for each of the subtests. We will use age and gender based scaled scores for alternating attention outcome. Scaled scores have a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. A lower score indicates greater impairment in the attentional factor. | Baseline | |
Other | Cognitive ability level | Child intellectual functioning will be assessed at baseline using age based normed Full Scale IQ from age appropriate Weschler scales (WPPSI-IV or WISC-V). The median Full Scale IQ is centered at 100, with a standard deviation of 15. A higher score indicates greater cognitive ability. | Baseline | |
Other | Domains of neurodevelopmental impairment | Children's overall level of neurodevelopmental impairment will be calculated by tallying the total number of domains assessed as significantly impaired (<3rd percentile on a standardised measures) against Australian FASD diagnostic criteria (0-10), including: Brain structure and neurology, motor skills, cognition, language, academic achievement, memory, attention, executive function, affect regulation and adaptive behaviour/social communication. The total number of domains impaired is added up for each participant using domain specific criteria (See FASD guide), defined by performance below the third percentile. The range is 0-10; a higher count is greater number of domains of impairment. | Baseline | |
Other | Demographics | Child demographic (age, sex) data will be extracted from medical records. | Baseline | |
Other | Socioeconomic status | Family details and socioeconomic status will be coded from medical record review: ethnic group mother & child, child language spoken at home, parental relationship status, family structure (custody), number of children living in household, maternal work status, socioeconomic status (postcode). | Baseline | |
Primary | Change in ADHD symptoms - teacher report - between placebo and stimulant | ADHD symptoms will be measured using the Conners 3rd Edition-Teacher (Conners 3-T), for 6-18 year old's and the Conners Early Childhood teachers/childcare providers (full length) form for participants 2-6 years. Each item is rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 3 (0=never or rarely; 1=sometimes; 2=often; 3=very often). Test- retest values for the Conners scales indicate excellent temporal stability (ranging from .73 to 1.00).
The T-score is norm referenced, with a mean of 50. The average range falls within one standard deviation of the mean (i.e., between 40 and 59). A higher score indicates more elevated symptoms. T score Guideline 70+Very Elevated Score 65-69 Elevated Score 40-59 Average score 60-64 High average score < 40 Low score. Investigators will examine Inattentive and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Symptom Scales. Symptoms indicated for each subscale are summed to get total. |
Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) | |
Primary | Change in ADHD symptoms - parent report - between placebo and stimulant | ADHD symptoms will be measured using the Conners 3rd Edition-Parent (Conners 3-P), for 6-18 year old's and the Conners Early Childhood parent (full length) form for participants 2-6 years. Each item is rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 3 (0=never or rarely; 1=sometimes; 2=often; 3=very often). Test- retest values for the Conners scales indicate excellent temporal stability (ranging from .73 to 1.00).
The T-score is norm referenced. The average range falls within one standard deviation of the mean (i.e., between 40 and 59). A higher score indicates more elevated symptoms. T score Guideline 70+Very Elevated Score 65-69 Elevated Score 40-59 Average score 60-64 High average score < 40 Low score. Investigators will examine Inattentive and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Symptom Scales. Symptoms indicated for each subscale are summed to get the total. |
Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) | |
Primary | Change in spatial working memory - between placebo and stimulant | Spatial Working Memory (SWM) task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. SWM is a component of cognitive executive function which is measured by SWM task of CANTAB between the errors. The ability to retain spatial information and manipulate remembered items in working memory will be measured with the SWM task of CANTAB which is self-ordered and assesses the individual's ability to strategise. Between search errors will be analysed. Scores are raw scores, with no normative data available. Higher error score indicated poorer performance. Scale does not have a maximum range. | Day 3 of each trial week (8 weeks total) | |
Primary | Change in Visual Information Processing - between placebo and stimulant | Rapid Visual Information Processing (SOC) from Cantab. SOC Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) is a test of spatial planning that requires individuals to use problem-solving strategies to match two sets of stimuli. The participant must move the balls in the bottom display to copy the pattern shown in the top display. The balls are moved one at a time by selecting the required ball, then selecting the position to which it should be moved. The participant is instructed to make as few moves as possible to match the two pattern.
The outcome measure of this subtest is the number of problems completed, regardless of whether the maximum moves limit was reached on any problem. |
Day 3 of each trial week (8 weeks total) | |
Secondary | Change in child problem behaviour rating- between placebo and stimulant | Top Problem Rating. This will be used as a brief but robust measure of child emotional and behavioural difficulties as rated by the parent. Top Problems Assessment (TPA) is a brief, idiographic procedure that allows clinicians and researchers to identify problems of children that are especially important from the perspective of the caregiver. The severity of these problems, once identified, will monitored daily.
The overall severity of problem rating (0 - 4) between placebo and active medication arms will be used as an indicator of problem worsening or improving. as one index of whether improvement is occurring. A higher problem rating indicates greater perceived difficulties. |
Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) | |
Secondary | Change in functional Impairment- between placebo and stimulant | Impairment resulting from ADHD symptoms. This scale contains the items that are most likely to represent the participant's target of treatment. The instrument uses a Likert scale such that any item rating 2 or 3 is clinically impaired. The scale is scored generating the total score. When defining impairment for DSM-IV, any domain with at least two items scored 2, one item scored 3 or a mean score >1.5 is impaired. | Daily for 5 week days (Monday - Friday) of each trial week (8 weeks total) | |
Secondary | Difference in side effects during placebo and stimulant phase | Investigators will monitor side effects of the placebo and active medication using the Barkley Side Effects Rating Scale (17 symptoms; 0 = absent, severity rated from 1 to 9). Parent ratings of side effects for the drug and placebo conditions will be described using the mean total side effect rating for each condition. | Day 5 of each trial week (8 weeks total) | |
Secondary | Trial feasibility - recruitment rate | Feasibility of the study (n-of-1 design) will be explored using trial recruitment rate across the trial from study start to study close. Investigators will calculate recruitment feasibility as the percentage of eligible participants agreeing to participate. A higher percentage will indicate greater participation. | End of 8 month active trial phase | |
Secondary | Trial feasibility - completion rate | Feasibility of the study (n-of-1 design) will be explored using completion rates across the trial from study start to study close. Completion rate will be the percentage of enrolled participants who complete the trial. A higher percentage will indicate greater participation. | End of 8 month active trial phase | |
Secondary | Compliance | Investigators will inspect participant medication diaries, to calculate treatment compliance. Non-compliance will be defined as missing more than one or more days of the active drug or placebo condition. | End of 8 month active trial phase | |
Secondary | Assessment completion rate | Investigators will calculate the percentage of outcome assessments completed by each participant to examine assessment feasibility of the study design. | End of 8 month active trial phase | |
Secondary | Data completion reason | Investigators will also examine reasons for incomplete outcome data. | End of 8 month active trial phase | |
Secondary | Adverse events | Adverse events (AE's) will be coded using the, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), and calculated once each per participant. We will describe the total number of AE's across the trial. | End of 8 month active trial phase |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06163651 -
Evaluating a One-Year Version of the Parent-Child Assistance Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01961050 -
Preventing FAS/ARND in Russian Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05108974 -
Choline Supplementation as a Neurodevelopmental Intervention in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Study
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02457676 -
Improving Self Regulation in Children With Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Spectrum Disorders: A Neuroplastic Intervention
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06005181 -
The Synchrony Study: Examining Music Training for Children With FASD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04571463 -
Ethyl Glucuronide in Urine Samples of Pregnant Women Within the HUS ja PHHYKY Area
|
||
Completed |
NCT03361293 -
Cognitive Training and tDCS for Children With FASD
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05534568 -
The Oklahoma Parent-Child Assistance Program
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05456321 -
CIFASD 5 tDCS and Cognitive Training
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01911299 -
Choline Supplementation in Children With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04332172 -
Scaling Up: A Multi-Site Trial of e-SBI for Alcohol Use in Pregnancy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05960461 -
Families Moving Forward (FMF) Connect Pro for Mental Health Providers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05604014 -
Feasibility Study of the My Health Coach App for Adults With FASD
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03852550 -
READYorNot[TM] Brain-Based Disabilities Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02735473 -
Choline Supplementation as a Neurodevelopmental Intervention in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03782935 -
Nutritional Risk Factors for FASD in Ukraine
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04918043 -
Alcohol Use During Pregnancy in Finland According to Meconium Samples
|
||
Completed |
NCT04072809 -
Dissecting the Genetics of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
|
||
Completed |
NCT01149538 -
Postnatal Choline Supplementation in Children With Prenatal Alcohol Exposure
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05028517 -
Efficacy Trial of the FMF Connect Mobile Health Intervention
|
N/A |