Fertility Clinical Trial
— SONTECOfficial title:
Comparison of the Number of Visits and the Quality of Life Versus Natural Cycle in Stimulated Cycle Before Frozen Embryo Transfer
NCT number | NCT02834117 |
Other study ID # | SONTEC |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 4 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 2015 |
Est. completion date | March 2018 |
Verified date | February 2019 |
Source | Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Embryo freezing is a technique used regularly to optimize the pregnancy rate in case of infertility. This method is performed in presence of supernumerary embryo(s) after fresh transfer, or after freeze all embryos in case of medical reasons. It is necessary to control that the transfer is performed when the endometrium is receptive, which is essential for embryo implantation and pregnancy. This period is defined as the "implantation window". Endometrial preparation can be achieved by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or moderate ovarian stimulation (SO). The implantation window can also be assessed by monitoring of a natural cycle (NC). The objectives of this open randomized study is to compare the number of visits (ultrasound and blood tests) induced by the SO or NC as well as the women quality of life in both groups.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 124 |
Est. completion date | March 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 20 Years to 38 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Affiliation to the general social security regime and benefiting from 100% infertility; - Regular Cycles 26 to 35 days; - Support in IVF or ICSI ; - Existence of at least 2 frozen embryos to J2 or J3; - Treated for their first or second cycle of TEC. Exclusion Criteria: - Donor sperm; - Irregular cycles and / or polycystic ovary syndrome; - Embryos frozen at J1 or J5 / J6 or double planned transfer or transfer of 3 embryos intended; - Patients who have had more than 3 transfers or more than 6 embryos replaced without pregnancy or puncture rank> 3; - uterine malformation existing; - Presence of a hydrosalpinx. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CHI Creteil | Créteil |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Dr Massin Nathalie |
France,
Bjuresten K, Landgren BM, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A. Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):534-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.019. Epub 2010 Jun 26. — View Citation
Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der171. Epub 2011 Jun 10. — View Citation
de La Rochebrochard E, Quelen C, Peikrishvili R, Guibert J, Bouyer J. Long-term outcome of parenthood project during in vitro fertilization and after discontinuation of unsuccessful in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.067. Epub 2008 Aug 15. — View Citation
Eftekhar M, Rahmani E, Pourmasumi S. Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014 Jul;12(7):513-8. — View Citation
El Bahja D, Hertz P, Schweitzer T, Lestrade F, Ragage JP. [Frozen embryo transfer protocol: does spontaneous cycle give good results?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013 Nov;41(11):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.08.007. Epub 2012 Feb 16. French. — View Citation
Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25. — View Citation
Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):458-70. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt030. Epub 2013 Jul 2. Review. Erratum in: Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):255-261. — View Citation
Haouzi D, Assou S, Mahmoud K, Tondeur S, Rème T, Hedon B, De Vos J, Hamamah S. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1436-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep039. Epub 2009 Feb 26. — View Citation
Nargund G, Wei CC. Successful planned delay of ovulation for one week with indomethacin. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996 Sep;13(8):683-4. — View Citation
Park SJ, Goldsmith LT, Skurnick JH, Wojtczuk A, Weiss G. Characteristics of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge in young ovulatory women. Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):684-90. Epub 2007 Apr 16. — View Citation
Tobler KJ, Zhao Y, Weissman A, Majumdar A, Leong M, Shoham Z. Worldwide survey of IVF practices: trigger, retrieval and embryo transfer techniques. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):561-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3232-6. Epub 2014 Apr 18. — View Citation
Tomás C, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, Humaidan P. Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer--a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1058. Epub 2012 Jul 27. — View Citation
Troude P, Guibert J, Bouyer J, de La Rochebrochard E; DAIFI Group. Medical factors associated with early IVF discontinuation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Oct 31. — View Citation
Weissman A, Levin D, Ravhon A, Eran H, Golan A, Levran D. What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jul;19(1):66-71. — View Citation
Yu J, Ma Y, Wu Z, Li Y, Tang L, Li Y, Deng B. Endometrial preparation protocol of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jan;291(1):201-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3396-0. Epub 2014 Jul 31. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of visits | number of visits (for clinical examination, ultrasound and hormonal dosage) required to monitor ovulation in both groups | From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days | |
Secondary | Fertiqol | the score of quality of life related to the couple's infertility, the Fertiqol questionnaire, a questionnaire validated by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and taking into account the tolerance to treatment; | From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days | |
Secondary | defrost cancellation rate | the defrost cancellation rate cycle started, whatever the cause: Early ovulation problem of organization, ... excluding "non-transfer" related to embryo lysis thawing | From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days | |
Secondary | transfer on weekends and holidays | the transfer rate on weekends and holidays | From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days | |
Secondary | HCG levels> 100 U / L | the incipient pregnancy rate per transfer defined by a HCG levels> 100 U / L | From inclusion visit to pregnancy test : up to 100 days | |
Secondary | pregnancy | the rate of pregnancy by ultrasound transfer defined by the presence of a cardiac activity | From pregnancy test to ultrasound at 6 week of gestation : up to 100 days | |
Secondary | Birth | The live birth rate per transfer defined by the birth of at least one living child | From transfer to delivery : up to 9 months | |
Secondary | Gestationnal age at delivery | the term of delivery | From transfer to delivery : up to 9 months | |
Secondary | Implantation | the implantation rate defined by the total number of live births to the total number of embryos replaced | From transfer to delivery : up to 9 months | |
Secondary | Miscarriage | the rate of early miscarriage (before 12 SA) | From pregnancy test to ultrasound at 6 week of gestation : up to 100 days | |
Secondary | Cost | the average estimated cost of drug treatment and monitoring (ultrasound and hormone assays). | From pregnancy test to ultrasound at 6 week of gestation : up to 100 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT02759705 -
Bladder Exstrophy (FIVES FertIlity Vesical Exstrophy Sexuality)
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02534857 -
A Study Comparing a Shorter Exposure of Oocyte to Spermatozoa Versus a Standard Incubation on the Live Birth Rate of In-vitro Fertilization Treatment
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT01803893 -
Prognostic Value of PIF Detection in Embryo Culture Media Correlation With Pregnancy Outcome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01888744 -
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) With Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Versus Antagonist
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT01173276 -
Intrauterine Insemination In HIV-Discordant Couples
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03680937 -
Methods for Fertility Preservation: Impact of Vitrification on in Vitro Matured Oocytes
|
||
Completed |
NCT03455062 -
Fertility Study of Women Who Received Organ Transplantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02736214 -
Reproductive Life Plan-based Counseling With Men
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01895192 -
Sperm Morphology by High Magnification in Fertility Men
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01614704 -
Impact of Sequential Chemotherapy on Young Patients Breast Cancer Treated Fertility
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01232972 -
Oocyte Cryopreservation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01268592 -
Fertility Preservation in Female Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01012596 -
Creighton Model Effectiveness, Intentions and Behaviors Assessment (CEIBA)
|
||
Completed |
NCT00390754 -
Usefulness of Home Pregnancy Testing
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00231504 -
Study of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Receptor in Women With Low Antral Follicle Count
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03345264 -
The Find Your PATHS (Pragmatic Assessment of a Tool to Help Survivors) to Sexual Health and Parenthood Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05414812 -
Intervening on Women's Health for Rural Young Breast Cancer Survivors
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02661932 -
Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06172504 -
Ejaculation Frequency and Semen Parameters
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02878434 -
Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Cancer
|