View clinical trials related to Femur Fractures.
Filter by:This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, two-arm, non-inferiority study which will be conducted in China to support registration of a cephalomedullary nailing system (TFNA) that currently is available globally. The study will compare the safety and the effectiveness of two intramedullary nails (the investigational group is TFNA and the control group is PFNA-II).Patients enrolled at each site will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1, i.e. one patient assigned to surgery implanted with TFNA for each patient assigned to PFNA-II. Separate block randomization schedules within each site will be used to ensure equal distribution of treatment and control patients. Up to 15 centers will be approved to participate in this study. Patient will be clinically followed after surgery at 1, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The data up to and including 24 week follow up visit will be used in determining the primary safety and effectiveness of the TFNA. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether fracture union rate, evaluated 24 weeks after proximal femur fracture, for the investigational TFNA intramedullary nail is non-inferior to that for currently available control product PFNA-II in patients with proximal femur fractures.
The aim of this cohort study is to precisely measure patients' exposure to gonadal radiation during orthopaedic trauma surgery involving the acetabulum, pelvis, hip, and femur, and to apply these findings to a previously described and validated formula to determine the increased risk of future adverse health effects to the reproductive organs. The investigators null hypothesis is standard of care use of x-ray fluoroscopy during treatment of pelvis, hip, and femur fractures will not expose patients to a significant gonadal radiation load. Analysis of patients' intraoperative radiation doses by means of a previously validated formula will not display a significantly increased risk of adverse health events in the reproductive organs.
The purpose of this study is to compare two different but standard treatments for the fixation of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic. The investigators aim to compare open reduction internal fixation using a locked plating system versus plating and strut allograft with cerclage wiring to determine which treatment results in a faster return to function as measured by the TUG test at 6 weeks post-op.