Fasciitis, Plantar Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy of Dry Needling in Plantar Fasciitis
Verified date | July 2020 |
Source | Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The plantar fasciitis (PF) is the most common cause of pain on the underside of the heel. About 10% to 20% of the population suffer once during their lifetime. PF concept began to describe at the end of XX century through the discovery of new clinical and histopathological signs of the plantar fascia. The difficulty of diagnosis, understanding and treatment of PF require us to develop new treatment avenues to improve the approach and the understanding of it. Dry needling (DN) as a treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and myofascial trigger points (MTP) of muscle associated with the pathology, it may be a good treatment strategy, as demonstrated in the treatment of MPS in other body regions such as the neck, shoulder or the lumbar spine.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | May 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Ultrasonographic study in which a proximal thickened affected plantar fascia is observed -greater than or equal to 4 mm. - Pain fell to the first steps in the morning. - Pain with palpation at the insertion of the medial calcaneal tubercle, above 5, in a 10-point VAS. - Pathology time evolution of greater than or equal to 4 weeks. - Age of patients over 18 years. - Acceptance by the patient to participate in the study, having signed the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Presence of neoplastic disease. - Presence of neurological, sensory, orthopedic and / or surgical alterations. - The patient is already doing treatment of physical medicine and rehabilitation. - Be subjected to antiplatelet drug therapy. - Fear of needles (needle phobia). - Difficulty for the patient to understand the instructions to be followed during the study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Clínica Universitaria de Podología de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid | Madrid |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View. | Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken. | 1 day. | |
Primary | Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View. | Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken. | 1 month | |
Primary | Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View. | Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken. | 3 month | |
Primary | Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Thickness of the Affected Plantar Fascia, in Longitudinal View. | Plantar fascia thickness in millimeters with ultrasonography at 0,5 centimeters from the calcaneo bone. Mean of 3 measures was taken. | 6 month | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale. | First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 1 day. | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale. | First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale. | First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 3 month | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel, by Visual Analog Scale. | First step pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 6 month | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale. | Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 1 day | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale. | Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale. | Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 3 month | |
Secondary | Pain Assessment in the Affected Heel After Long Periods of Rest, by Visual Analog Scale. | Pain after long periods of rest measured by Visual Analogue Scale, from 0 to 10 points, in the affected heel. In the Visual Analogue Scale, 0 represents the lowest score and 10 represents the highest score when the patient felt the maximum level of pain. | 6 month | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 1 day | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values.Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extened. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 3 month | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Extended. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee extended measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 6 month | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 1 day | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 3 month | |
Secondary | Goniometric Assessment of Joint Range of Motion Ankle Dorsiflexion With Knee Flexed. | Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed 90º measured in grades using a goniometer. There is not exist minimum and maximum scores for the goniometric assessment, because the limits of the range of motion depends on the joint mobility, then, for this measure, higher values are better results than lower values. Clinically, it means that one patient with 100 degrees of range of motion has more mobility than another with 90 degrees. | 6 month |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02982226 -
ReNu™ vs. Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04022070 -
The Effect of Dynamic Tape ® on Plantar Fascitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04664712 -
Efficacy of Focused Shock Waves Combined With Adjuvant Therapy With Tendon Supplement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01439932 -
Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Combined With Standard Treatment in the Management of Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02679521 -
Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment for Chronic Plantar Fasciopathy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05153993 -
Effect of Stretching on Visco-elastic Behaviour of the Fascia Plantaris in a Healthy Population
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01297686 -
Exercise Versus Corticosteroid Randomized Clinical Trial for Plantar Fasciitis
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04917406 -
Effect of Iontophoresis vs. Ultrasound and Iontophoresis in Plantar Fasciitis". Plantar Fasciitis"
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02427191 -
Micronized dHACM Injectable for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06305507 -
Differents Laser Applications on Plantar Fasciitis
|
||
Completed |
NCT01429883 -
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Treatment - Can the Pain be Reduced?
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03414268 -
Micronized dHACM Injectable for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03020693 -
Effectiveness of Invasive Electrostimulation Combined With an Exercise Program in Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02668510 -
RCT Comparing ESWT With PRP for Plantar Fasciitis in High Demand Cohort
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01865734 -
Comparison of Usual Podiatric Care and Early Physical Therapy for Plantar Heel Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05925777 -
Plantar Fasciitis Treatment: Influence of the Possible Presence of Subchondral Bone Edema
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06370741 -
Effect of Stretching Exercises on Plantar Fascia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06426667 -
Effect of Radiofrequency Treatment in Plantar Fasciitis Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT05328700 -
Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Kinesiology Taping in Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06318910 -
Customized Foot Orthoses on Muscle Activity During Standing and Gait in Plantar Heel Pain
|
N/A |