Family Health — The Health Promoting Conversations for Families With a Critically Ill Relative
Citation(s)
Ågård AS, Egerod I, Tønnesen E, Lomborg K From spouse to caregiver and back: a grounded theory study of post-intensive care unit spousal caregiving. J Adv Nurs. 2015 Aug;71(8):1892-903. doi: 10.1111/jan.12657. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Antonovsky, A , Sourani, T., 1988. Family sense of coherence and family adaption. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 50:79-92.
Benzein E, Berg A The Swedish version of Herth Hope Index--an instrument for palliative care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2003 Dec;17(4):409-15.
Benzein E, Olin C, Persson C 'You put it all together' - families' evaluation of participating in Family Health Conversations. Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Mar;29(1):136-44. doi: 10.1111/scs.12141. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
Benzein EG, Hagberg M, Saveman BI 'Being appropriately unusual': a challenge for nurses in health-promoting conversations with families. Nurs Inq. 2008 Jun;15(2):106-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2008.00401.x. Review.
Benzein EG, Saveman BI Health-promoting conversations about hope and suffering with couples in palliative care. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008 Sep;14(9):439-45.
Bylund A, Årestedt K, Benzein E, Thorell A, Persson C Assessment of family functioning: evaluation of the General Functioning Scale in a Swedish Bariatric Sample. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Sep;30(3):614-22. doi: 10.1111/scs.12269. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83.
Davydow DS, Gifford JM, Desai SV, Needham DM, Bienvenu OJ Posttraumatic stress disorder in general intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 Sep-Oct;30(5):421-34. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Jul 30. Review.
Dorell Å, Isaksson U, Östlund U, Sundin K Family Health Conversations have Positive Outcomes on Families - A Mixed Method Research Study. Open Nurs J. 2017 Feb 28;11:14-25. doi: 10.2174/1874434601711010014. eCollection 2017.
Dufault K, Martocchio BC Symposium on compassionate care and the dying experience. Hope: its spheres and dimensions. Nurs Clin North Am. 1985 Jun;20(2):379-91.
Eggenberger SK, Nelms TP Being family: the family experience when an adult member is hospitalized with a critical illness. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1618-28.
Frivold G, Slettebø Å, Dale B Family members' lived experiences of everyday life after intensive care treatment of a loved one: a phenomenological hermeneutical study. J Clin Nurs. 2016 Feb;25(3-4):392-402. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13059.
Fumis RR, Ranzani OT, Martins PS, Schettino G Emotional disorders in pairs of patients and their family members during and after ICU stay. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 23;10(1):e0115332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115332. eCollection 2015.
Garvin P, Nilsson L, Carstensen J, Jonasson L, Kristenson M Plasma levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 are independently associated with psychosocial factors in a middle-aged normal population. Psychosom Med. 2009 Apr;71(3):292-300. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181960e7f. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Herth K Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 1992 Oct;17(10):1251-9.
Orwelius L, Kristenson M, Fredrikson M, Walther S, Sjöberg F Hopelessness: Independent associations with health-related quality of life and short-term mortality after critical illness: A prospective, multicentre trial. J Crit Care. 2017 Oct;41:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.044. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Sagy S, Dotan N Coping resources of maltreated children in the family: a salutogenic approach. Child Abuse Negl. 2001 Nov;25(11):1463-80.
Svenningsen H, Langhorn L, Ågård AS, Dreyer P Post-ICU symptoms, consequences, and follow-up: an integrative review. Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Jul;22(4):212-220. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12165. Epub 2015 Feb 17. Review.
Tilburgs B, Nijkamp MD, Bakker EC, van der Hoeven H The influence of social support on patients' quality of life after an intensive care unit discharge: A cross-sectional survey. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Dec;31(6):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
Wåhlin I, Ek AC, Idvall E Patient empowerment in intensive care--an interview study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006 Dec;22(6):370-7. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
Ware, J , Kosinski, M., Dewey, J., 2001. How to score version 2 of the SF-36 health survey. In.Rhode Island, USA: Quality Metric Incorporated; Lincoln.
Ware, JE , 1993. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide., Boston., The New Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
WMA, The World Medical Association , 2013. Declaration of Helsinki - Etical Principals for 10 Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, 11 https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-12 medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
Wright, LM , Leahey, M., 2009. Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and 14 intervention (5 Rev ed ed.). Pennsylvania: F.A. Davis Company.
Wright, LM , Leahey, M., 2013. Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and 17 intervention (6th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
The Health Promoting Conversations Intervention for Families With a Critically Ill Relative: A Pilot RCT
Interventional studies are often prospective and are specifically tailored to evaluate direct impacts of treatment or preventive measures on disease.
Observational studies are often retrospective and are used to assess potential causation in exposure-outcome relationships and therefore influence preventive methods.
Expanded access is a means by which manufacturers make investigational new drugs available, under certain circumstances, to treat a patient(s) with a serious disease or condition who cannot participate in a controlled clinical trial.
Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.
Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.