Rilonacept for Treatment of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF)

Familial Mediterranean Fever Clinical Trial

Official title:

Phase 2 Study of IL-1 Trap (Rilonacept) for Treatment of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00582907
• Other study ID #: 1RO1FD003435-01
• Secondary ID: FDA 1RO1FD003435
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• First received: December 19, 2007
• Last updated: February 5, 2013
• Start date: August 2008
• Est. completion date: September 2011

Study information

• Verified date: February 2013
• Source: The Cleveland Clinic
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a genetic disease resulting in recurrent attacks of fever, abdominal pain, chest pain, arthritis and rash. There are 5-15% of patients who continue to have FMF attacks despite treatment with colchicine or who cannot tolerate colchicine. Currently there are no alternatives to colchicine. Pyrin, the protein that has a defect in FMF has an important role in the regulation of a molecule called interleukin (IL)-1 beta production and activity. This molecule is very important in the process of inflammation in FMF.

Therefore we propose to use IL-1 Trap (Rilonacept), a medication that binds and neutralizes IL-1.

We will enroll in this study 17 subjects from the age of 4 years, including adults with active FMF despite colchicine therapy. Subjects will receive in random order two 3-month courses of Rilonacept at 2.2 mg/kg (maximum 160 mg) by weekly subcutaneous injection and two 3-month courses of placebo injection. If patients have at least two FMF attacks during a treatment course they will be able to get if they choose the other treatment until the end of that treatment course. Our hypothesis is that Rilonacept will decrease the number of acute FMF attacks and will be safe to use. This study may confirm the importance of IL-1 in the cause of FMF.

Funding source - FDA Office of Orphan Products Development

Description:

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive autoinflammatory genetic disorder resulting in recurrent attacks of fever, serositis, arthritis and rash. Late complications of untreated FMF include the development of renal amyloidosis. FMF is a rare orphan disease in the United States. Treatment with colchicine is effective in reducing the frequency of episodes in most patients and the development of amyloidosis in nearly all patients. However, there are still 5-15% of patients who continue to have acute FMF attacks despite colchicine therapy or are intolerant of colchicine, usually from gastrointestinal adverse effects. Currently there are no effective alternatives to colchicine. Pyrin, the mutated protein in FMF has an important role in the regulation of IL-1 beta production and activity. Mutations in pyrin result in increased IL-1 beta levels in mice and humans. IL-1 beta is an important pro-inflammatory cytokine. Thus, we hypothesize that inhibition of IL-1 will decrease acute attacks in patients with FMF. We propose to use IL-1 Trap (Rilonacept), a fusion protein consisting of human IL-1 cytokine receptor extracellular domains and the FC portion of human IgG1 that binds and neutralizes IL-1.

We will enroll 17 subjects from the age of 4 years, including adults, from multiple centers in the United States with active FMF (at least 1 attack per month) despite receiving at least 1.2-1.5 mg/d of colchicine (dose dependent on age) or are intolerant of colchicine. Subjects will be diagnosed by clinical criteria with at least one heterozygote mutation of the MEFV (pyrin) gene. After screening subjects will be monitored for a month to observe for acute FMF attacks or if they did not develop an attack in that month until they develop two attacks. We will then use a single-subject alternating treatments design with subjects receiving in random order two 3-month courses of Rilonacept at 2.2 mg/kg (max 160 mg) by weekly SC injection and two 3-month courses of comparable volume placebo. Subjects will continue the usual colchicine dose they were on when they started the study. Subjects with 2 acute FMF attacks during a treatment course will be able to crossover to the other treatment arm until the end of that treatment course. There will be 10 study visits: 1. Screening. 2. Treatment baseline after one month or after subjects have developed FMF attacks as described above. After 1 month of each treatment course and at the end of each treatment course (overall 8 visits). At each visit subjects will return completed diary forms, used and unused drug, queried on adverse effects, undergo a physical examination and laboratory tests obtained for inflammation, safety and in some visits for translational studies. Subjects will also fill out quality of life questionnaires and give an overall estimation of the disease activity. Results will be analyzed by traditional frequency statistics (using an intent to treat analysis) and by Bayesian hierarchical modeling. Our primary aim is to assess the efficacy of Rilonacept in decreasing the number of acute FMF attacks while monitoring drug safety.

The significance of the study includes short and long-term benefits. Fewer FMF attacks will result in less functional impairment and a higher quality of life in colchicine resistant or intolerant patients. Once weekly injections have the potential to improve treatment compliance. Fewer acute attacks of arthritis may prevent the development of chronic joint damage. In the long-term, better FMF control may prevent amyloidosis. This study may confirm the importance of IL-1 in the pathogenesis of FMF and provide support for an FDA filing for use of Rilonacept in FMF. The study design may serve as a template for trials of new biologic drugs for rare diseases.

Other known NCT identifiers

• NCT00767143

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 14
• Est. completion date: September 2011
• Est. primary completion date: September 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 4 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Subject has a definitive diagnosis of FMF as by the Tel-Hashomer clinical criteria (long version of criteria) with at least one mutation on one of the MEFV gene alleles. However, subjects with an isolated heterozygous mutation of exon 2 of the MEFV gene (including E148Q) will not be eligible.

• Subject must have an estimated mean of at least one acute FMF attack per month before and during the month of screening.

• Subject is at least four years of age (with no upper limit of age).

• Subjects must have received an adequate trial of colchicine defined as treatment of at least 1.5 mg/d for at least 3 months if =6 years old or 1.2 mg/d if less than 6 years, or an inability to tolerate colchicine due to adverse effects in a dose that controls acute attacks in the frequency of less than one attack per month.

• If subject is being treated with anakinra at the time of consent, washout must be done (about 3 days). Subject must experience 2 attacks before randomization visit can occur.

• If subject has been treated previously with anti-TNF drugs, appropriate washout must be done. Etanercept must be discontinued for 4 weeks prior to randomization; Adalimumab and Infliximab must be discontinued for 8 weeks prior to randomization.

• If subject is a female of childbearing potential, she must agree to use adequate contraception (adequate contraception can include abstinence) for the duration of the trial and 3 months after and must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test prior to administration of study medication.

• If subject is a male and has reached puberty, he must agree to use adequate contraception or abstinence during the study and for 3 months after discontinuation from study.

• Subject's parent or legal guardian has provided written informed consent prior to screening for this study or if subject is older than 18 years has provided informed consent him/herself.

• Subject, if applicable, has assented to participate prior to screening for this study.

• Subject and, if applicable, parent/legal guardian, agree to comply with study requirements and are able to come to the clinic for all required study visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

• The subject has existing biopsy proven amyloidosis or proteinuria >0.5 gram per day.

• The subject has another active inflammatory rheumatic disease.

• The subject has an active malignancy of any type, or history of a malignancy.

• The subject has active GI disease (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease), a chronic or acute renal or hepatic disorder, or a significant coagulation defect.

• The subject has an AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT) or BUN >2 x ULN or creatinine >1.5 mg/dL or any other laboratory abnormality considered by the examining physician to be clinically significant within 28 days before the Baseline visit.

• Current use of an anti-tumor necrosis factor drug.

• The subject has, in the investigator's opinion, a chronic condition (e.g., diabetes, epilepsy) that is either not stable or well-controlled and may interfere with the conduct of the study.

• The subject has received any investigational medication within 30 days before the first dose of study medication or is scheduled to receive an investigational drug, other than study medications described in this protocol, during the course of the study.

• The subject has chronic or active infection or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with i.v. antibiotics within 30 days or oral antibiotics within 14 days prior to the screening evaluation.

• The subject has known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status.

• The subject has known past or current hepatitis.

• The subject has received a live virus vaccine within 1 month prior to the baseline visit.

• The subject has a positive PPD test.

• The subject is sexually active and not practicing effective birth control.

• The subject is pregnant or breast feeding a child.

• Any concurrent medical condition which would, in the investigator's opinion, compromise the subject's ability to tolerate the study drug or would make the subject unable to cooperate with the protocol.

• History of/or current psychiatric illness that would interfere with ability to comply with protocol requirements or give informed consent.

• Subject has a history of alcohol or drug abuse within the past 6 months that would interfere with ability to comply with protocol requirements.

• Inability to comply with the study requirements for any reason.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Brucellosis
• Familial Mediterranean Fever
• Fever
• Hereditary Autoinflammatory Diseases

Intervention

Drug:
• Rilonacept
2.2 mg/kg/wk by subcutaneous injection, for 3 months
• Placebo
placebo by subcutaneous injection weekly for 3 months

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	NIH	Bethesda	Maryland
United States	Cleveland Clinic	Cleveland	Ohio
United States	Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Cedars-Sinai Medical Center	Los Angeles	California
United States	Children's Hospital of Central California	Madera	California
United States	NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases	New York	New York

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
The Cleveland Clinic

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (1)

Hashkes PJ, Spalding SJ, Giannini EH, Huang B, Johnson A, Park G, Barron KS, Weisman MH, Pashinian N, Reiff AO, Samuels J, Wright DA, Kastner DL, Lovell DJ. Rilonacept for colchicine-resistant or -intolerant familial Mediterranean fever: a randomized tria — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	To Assess the Efficacy of Rilonacept in Decreasing the Number of Acute FMF Attacks.	Difference in number of attacks per treatment month between rilonacept and placebo	attacks were assessed at the end of each 3 month treatment course (overall up to 6 month of rilonacept and 6 months of placebo, each)	No
Primary	To Determine if There is a Medically Important Difference Between the Safety Profiles of Rilonacept vs. Placebo.	Differences in adverse events (AEs) between rilonacept and placebo per patient-month of treatment. We separately analyzed injection site reactions and infectious adverse events. Other adverse events were too small in number to analyze. The upper table (and first statistical analysis) regards injection site reactions and lower table (and second statistical analysis) regards infections.	12 months of entire study length	Yes
Secondary	To Determine the Difference in the Length of Attacks During Treatment With Rilonacept vs. Placebo.	This outcome was the difference in days in the length of attacks between rilonacept and placebo.	12 months	No
Secondary	Percentage of Treatment Courses Without FMF Attacks in Rilonacept Courses as Compared to Placebo Courses.	The percentage of rilonacept and placebo treatment courses without FMF attacks.	Each treatment course of up to 3 months	No
Secondary	To Determine the Proportion of Courses in Which Subjects Attained at Least a 50% Decrease in Acute FMF Attacks During Rilonacept Courses as Compared to Placebo Courses.	Differences between rilonacept and placebo in the percentage of courses that attained at least a 50% decrease in FMF attacks when compared to attacks in the screening period.	Up to 3 months for each treatment course	No
Secondary	To Determine Differences in the Time to the Development of Attacks Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).	In a survival analysis we measured the difference (in days) until the development of the first and second attack within a treatment course of up to 3 months and examined differences in this parameter between rilonacept and placebo. Data regarding the development of the second attack are reported below. In regards to the first attack there were no significant differences between rilonacept and placebo (20 days (7.5,>90)for rilonacept; 15 (8,32) for placebo, P=0.066).	3 months	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).	Erythrocyte sedimentation rate - ESR (mm/h)	3 months (each treatment course, overall 12 months)	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in C-Reactive Protein Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)	Differences between the treatment courses in the C-Reactive Protein levels mg/L	3 months (each treatment course, overall 12 months)	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in the Platelet Count Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)	The difference between the treatment arms in the platelet count X 10 to the power of 9	3 months (each treatment course, overall 12 months)	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in the Fibrinogen Levels Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)	The differences between treatment arms in the fibrinogen level (micromol/L)	3 months (each treatment course, overall 12 months)	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in Serum Amyloid A Levels Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo)	The difference between the treatment arms in serum amyloid A levels (mg/L)	3 months (each treatment course, overall 12 months)	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in the Quality of Life Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).	Differences in the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during treatment with rilonacept vs. placebo. HRQOl was measured by the Childhood Health Questionnaire which was adopted also for adults. There are 2 summary scores: 1. Physical summary score. 2. Psychosocial summary score. The data reported below in the upper table is the physical summary composite score and in the lower table the psychosocial summary composite score. Scores were from 0-100 (higher is better) with a score of 50 representing the mean of the normal population.	12 months	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in the FMF Severity Score of the Subjects Between the Treatment Arms (Rilonacept vs. Placebo).	Differences in the Armenian Evaluation Score between rilonacept and placebo courses. The Armenian Evaluation Score is a composite score of disease severity based on the frequency, duration and character of attacks (degree of fever and severity of serositis). It was adapted to calculate a score for a 3-month treatment course. The lowest (best) score is 0 and higher values are worse. In theory there is no upper limit to the scale. The total score is reported (there are no subscales).	overall 12 months	No
Secondary	To Determine the Differences in the Proportion of Time Subjects Received Rilonacept vs Placebo	The proportion of time within the trial that participants received rilonacept as opposed to placebo. The reason for this outcome is that participants who had at least 2 attacks within an individual treatment course were able to "escape" in a blinded manner to the other treatment arm until the end of that treatment course and then resume the original randomization sequence. Thus participants may have been treated for a longer time with one treatment arm or the other.	12 months	No