View clinical trials related to Evaluation.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to develop, study and validate a rigorous and sustainable method for assessing the clinical appropriateness of the decision taken in the Emergency Department to admit or not to admit patients.
The aim of this study is to develop, study and validate a rigorous and sustainable method for assessing the clinical appropriateness of the decision taken in the Emergency Department to admit or not to admit patients.
Investigators established the efficacy evaluation criteria for tumor markers (RecistTM) in the preliminary research. Among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, patients with positive driving genes are more likely to exhibit abnormalities in tumor markers, which suggests that this criteria may be more suitable for evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapy in driving gene positive patients. Moreover, The judgment rules of the prelimary criteria still need further improvement. Therefore, in order to broaden the application scope of the RecistTM criteria, further improve the evaluation rules of RecistTM criteria, and multi-dimensionally confirm the reliability of RecistTM criteria on efficacy evaluation, investigators plan to conduct research on the application of RecistTM criteria in evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with positive driving genes.
The lower limit of time for postoperative observation and discharge criteria for diagnostic or operational tests program in outpatient under general intervenous anesthesia/sedation
Sixty patients with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) I-II physical status between the ages of 20-60 were randomized into three groups: TAP block group (Group T), ESP block group (Group E) and PVB group (Group P). Bilateral 20cc (total 40cc for each patient) 0.25% bupivacaine was applied by ultrasound (US) guidance. Intraoperative vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, and saturation), Train-of-four (TOF) values, additional dose of opioid and muscle relaxant needs, complications were recorded. Postoperative side effects (nausea, vomiting, itching, tremor), the need for additional postoperative analgesia, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were noted.
This study is an evaluation of the flexible and integrative psychiatric care model (according to § 64b of the German Social Code Book V (SGB V)) (FIT64b) in the child and adolescent psychiatry at the University Hospital Tübingen (UKT). The central concern of this evaluation is to answer the question whether FIT64b models offer advantages over standard care. The orientation of model care is a more cross-sectoral provision of services through more flexible treatment intensities.
The main aim of this study is to realize a system of continuous evaluation of healthcare quality in semi-intensive care units.
The delegation of procedures within the medical competence to the nurses can increase the effectiveness of the healthcare provided. The objectives of the study are (1) to assess the quality of training courses for delegated surgical procedures through implementation for graduate scrub nursing ("students") (2) and to evaluate the correlation between the evaluation of this training carried out by students and the self-assessment conducted by the faculty ("trainers").
The aim of this study was to determine the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach Scale in patients with neck pain.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized clinical trial of a web-based contraceptive decision aid compared to routine contraceptive counseling to evaluate the effect of the contraceptive decision aid on the contraceptive method selected by the participant. The investigators primary hypothesis is that women utilizing a computerized Contraceptive Decision Aid (CDA) will be more likely to choose highly effective contraception than women who undergo standard clinical contraceptive counseling.