View clinical trials related to Essential Hypertension.
Filter by:The main objective will be to evaluate the dose-response of ACT-132577 (aprocitentan) on diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in participants with grade 1 or 2 essential hypertension. Secondary objectives will be to evaluate the dose-response of ACT-132577 on: systolic blood pressure (SBP); control and response rate of blood pressure; 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a once daily oral regimen of 4 doses of ACT-132577.
The study design was composed of 2 parts, 2-way crossover and multiple-dose. There are having 2 groups in each part that have divided period 1 and period 2, and wash-out period is 16 days between periods. Each group is taking Telmisartan (80mg) and/or Atorvastatin (80mg) once a day for 6 days.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the use of a digital health offering in the management of persistent hypertension during chronic anti-hypertensive treatment.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil (AZM) in Asian adult participants with both essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fimasartan compared to Valsartan and Olmesartan(reference group) in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Patients have 2 weeks of placebo run-in and wash out period, 2 weeks of taking required dose and 4 weeks of taking double dose.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antihypertensive effect of azilsartan medoxomil compared with valsartan in Chinese participants with essential hypertension.
Randomized, open-label, parallel-group study conducted at a single center in Switzerland. Patients diagnosed with primary arterial hypertension requiring antihypertensive drug Treatment as well as patients after a 4 week wash out period (Amendment 07/2016) will be recruited at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Subjects will be randomized to either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-, angiotensin receptor blocker-, calcium channel blocker- or hydrochlorothiazide-treatment arm. Drug treatment follows current guidelines issued by the European Society of Hypertension. Treatment-naive patients will be started on an intermediate dose monotherapy (treatment period 1). In all patients who do not reach blood pressure targets after 4 weeks, the dose of the monotherapy drug will be doubled (high dose, treatment period 2). Sampling for the analysis of RAS peptide profiles, measurement of drug concentrations in plasma and non-invasive hemodynamic measurements will be done. A control group with 20 age and gender matched, healthy and normotensive subjects will be recruited to establish the characteristics of the RAS peptide profiles in a comparable but normotensive population.
Refractory hypertension is defined as failure to reach goal blood pressure control in patients who are adherent to full doses of the appropriate drug regime. Hypertension results in 7.6 million deaths annually and 92 million disability adjusted years worldwide, making it the number one attributable risk for death throughout the world. Conventional treatment involves lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy; however blood pressure can remain uncontrolled despite these treatment options. Previous studies have demonstrated a reduction in blood pressure in adults with essential hypertension with the use of various homoeopathic complexes. There has been no research done to date on the effect of the homoeopathic combination of Amylenum nitrosum 6cH, Crataegus oxyacantha 6cH, Natrum muriaticum 6cH and Scutellaria lateriflora 6cH in adults with refractory hypertension. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a homoeopathic complex Amylenum nitrosum 6cH, Crataegus oxyacantha 6cH, Natrum muriaticum 6cH and Scutellaria lateriflora 6cH on blood pressure in adults with refractory hypertension, by means of blood pressure readings.
Children are increasingly being diagnosed with essential hypertension and the absence of comparative effectiveness research in antihypertensive therapies has contributed to considerable differences in prescribing practices among physicians treating children with essential hypertension. This study will consist of a series of systematically-administered n-of-1 trials among children to verify the need for ongoing antihypertensive treatment and if so, to identify the preferred single drug therapy.
To investigate the efficacy and safety of azilsartan compared to olmesartan medoxomil in patients with grade I or II essential hypertension