Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00000121
Other study ID # NEI-20
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received September 23, 1999
Last updated September 16, 2009
Start date March 1984
Est. completion date May 1989

Study information

Verified date September 2009
Source National Eye Institute (NEI)
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Federal Government
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To determine whether the preoperative use of prisms in eyeglasses can improve the outcome of surgery for acquired esotropia, a type of strabismus.

To determine whether patients who respond to prism adaptation by developing a new stable angle of -deviation have a better surgical result than do patients who do not respond to prism adaptation.

To determine whether patients who respond to prism adaptation are more accurately corrected by operating for the prism-adapted angle or the original angle of deviation.

To determine the usefulness of certain input variables (e.g., age at the time of surgery, size of the deviation, visual acuity, binocular function, refractive error) in predicting which patients are more likely to benefit from prism adaptation.


Description:

Acquired esotropia (crossed eyes that develop after a child reaches the age of 6 months) accounts for 25 percent of all patients with misaligned eyes. Surgery to correct esotropia is done primarily to attain functional use of the two eyes together. The cosmetic aspect of the surgery is secondary. In 40 to 50 percent of cases, more than one operation is needed to accomplish the primary goal, and in some cases even three and four operations are needed.

Preliminary studies from two eye care centers reported that the use of prisms on eyeglasses for about a month before surgery led to good results after a single operation in more than 90 percent of patients. These uncontrolled preliminary studies pointed to the need for a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial designed to prove or disprove scientifically the beneficial effect of prisms.

The Prism Adaptation Study was a double randomization trial involving 286 patients. Three-fifths of the patients were randomly selected for prism adaptation before surgery. Of the patients who responded to the prisms, one-half were randomly selected to have surgery based on the amount of prism required to stabilize the deviation, and the other half had surgery based on the amount of esotropia originally measured. Patients who did not respond to the prisms also had surgery based on the amount of esotropia measured, as did the two-fifths of the patients who did not undergo prism adaptation.

Patients were examined postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. An independent examiner, masked to the treatment assignment, evaluated the patient at the 6-month followup. The results were analyzed to determine whether the outcome was better in patients who underwent prism adaptation or in those who underwent conventional treatment. Because the examiner did not know what type of treatment a patient had received, he or she would have no bias in evaluating the results.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date May 1989
Est. primary completion date
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender Both
Age group 3 Years and older
Eligibility An eligible male or female must have been age 3 years or older (adults were included) and must have had esotropia that occurred at age 6 months or older, with no history of previous eye muscle surgery.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Prisms in Eyeglasses


Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
National Eye Institute (NEI)

References & Publications (2)

Efficacy of prism adaptation in the surgical management of acquired esotropia. Prism Adaptation Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Sep;108(9):1248-56. — View Citation

Repka MX, Connett JE, Scott WE. The one-year surgical outcome after prism adaptation for the management of acquired esotropia. Ophthalmology. 1996 Jun;103(6):922-8. — View Citation

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05527015 - Bifocal Spectacles vs. Single Vision Spectacles for Esotropia Greater at Near Phase 3
Completed NCT00746304 - Long-Term Outcomes in the Treatment of Infantile and Acquired Esotropia With Botulinum Toxin N/A
Completed NCT01460355 - Comparison of Two Treatments for Strabismus Correction: Botulinum Toxin A Associated to Surgery and Surgery Alone Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06077682 - Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric Patients With Esotropia Phase 4
Completed NCT02570555 - Strabismus Surgery and Driving Ability
Active, not recruiting NCT00993174 - Surgery for Esotropia Under Topical Anesthesia N/A
Completed NCT01166503 - Early Versus Delayed Surgery for Infantile Esotropia
Active, not recruiting NCT02404324 - Conservative Treatment of Esotropia in Children up to 3 Years Old N/A
Completed NCT04429659 - Changes in Refractive Error in Patients With Both Partially Refractive Esotropia and Amblyopia
Recruiting NCT05615519 - Validation of a Smartphone-based Intelligent Diagnosis and Measurement for Strabismus
Completed NCT00000163 - Congenital Esotropia Observational Study (CEOS) N/A
Recruiting NCT01616108 - Bupivacaine Injection of Eye Muscles to Treat Strabismus Phase 2/Phase 3