View clinical trials related to Esophagectomy.
Filter by:The primary goal of this study is to collect short-term and long-term health outcomes of a robotic transhiatal esophagectomy procedure. Clinical (or health) outcomes measure the effect of the procedure on your overall health status. During this procedure, the surgeon will remove all or part of your esophagus. We want to identify patients who will have this procedure. We will look at data elements before, during, and after your procedure to understand the impact of this surgery on your post-operative clinical outcomes.
Despite the important advances in anaesthesia and the implementation of perioperative care, pulmonary complications in esophagectomy reach figures of between 20 and 35%, and these complications are also closely associated with the mortality rate. Factors that have been associated with the development of respiratory failure in the literature include among others the presence of previous respiratory pathology, history of smoking, malnutrition and rescue surgery. With the aim of improving morbimortality in patients undergoing esophagectomy, a multidisciplinary protocol based on the best scientific evidence at the present time has been implemented, with actions covering both the preoperative and postoperative areas. Based on this point, a prospective study has been designed that allows us to compare the incidence of respiratory failure before and after the implementation of the protocol.
Esophagectomy is the cornerstone of the curative treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Despite this treatment, patients can suffer from locoregional or distant metastatic disease and only a very selected group of patients can be cured: mostly those with recurrence in one single organ. Brain metastases are rare after esophagectomy for cancer, but they have a serious impact on survival. Agressive treatment is often moren difficult for brain metastases compared to other metastases and some risk factors have been identified earlier. There is an impression that the incidence of brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients has increased since the introduction of neoadjuvant treatment schemes. However, this is not clear yet. A potential explanation could be that chemotherapy disturbs the blood-brain-barrier, hereby facilitating the migration of tumor cells to the brain. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze the incidence and potential risk factors of brain metastases in patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Patients treated between 2000 and 2019 will be included and outcome parameters are Odds Ratio for brain metastases (comparison between primary surgery and neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery), time to recurrence and risk factors, number and characteristics of the brain metastases.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed the use of 80% high-dose inhalation oxygen (FiO2) during surgery to reduce postoperative infection in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. However, high-dose inhaled oxygen increases the risk of oxygen toxicity by increasing reactive oxygen species, and according to a recent research, hyperoxia in the ICU is one of the causes of mortality. In patients with general anesthesia requiring intubation, high-dose inhaled oxygen was associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in a dose-proportional manner and was significantly associated with mortality within 30 days after surgery. Therefore, it is necessary to study the optimum oxygen concentration during surgery to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in general anesthesia patients who require intubation. Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer still has higher morbidity and mortality rates than other common procedures. There are several factors such as aneurysmal leakage, esophageal substitute necrosis, cardiac complications, and pulmonary complications. Pulmonary complications have been reported to be a very important factor. Therefore, various methods have been proposed to reduce pulmonary complications after esophageal cancer surgery. One of them is minimally invasive surgery. However, even in the case of a thoracoscopic operation using a robot, one lung ventilation is inevitable for securing the visual field during surgery, and hypoxia and hyperoxia are known to be associated with postoperative acute lung injury. Therefore, in order to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications in the esophagectomy using robots, it is necessary to study the optimum oxygen concentration during surgery. The recently developed oxygen reserve index (ORI) uses a non-invasive sensor attached to the finger, similar to pulse oximetry, to detect persistent hyperoxia of more than 100 mmHg and less than 200 mmHg. Therefore, if the oxygen reserve index is used for robotic esophagectomy, which requires one lung ventilation, the degree of oxygenation of the patient can be monitored continuously and accurately. The authors will measure the oxygen reserve index in robotic esophagectomy, and analyze the correlation between oxygen reserve index and postoperative pulmonary complications. Furthermore, the cut-off value of the oxygen reserve index, which can reduce pulmonary complications, will be calculated.
Open surgery for esophageal cancer commonly involves large incisions in the chest, associated with a high rate of pulmonary complications (30-50%). Minimally invasive approach through keyhole surgery has been shown to reduce pulmonary infections by 20%. Enhanced recovery programmes are evidence-based protocols, developed to achieve early recovery after surgery with early mobilisation and chest physiotherapy and have been shown to reduce pulmonary complication rates as well. The investigators intend to objectively measure chest wall movement using 3D motion capture system as well as a wearable measurement system to monitor chest wall movement.
The Mayo Clinic Conduit Report Card Questionnaires have been created in order to have a consistent evaluation tools for patients undergoing esophageal reconstruction or treatment or patients that are experiencing an upper digestive disease in order to standardize and validate outcome measures. Data will be used to establish the validation of the questionnaires/survey. Data will also lead to the establishment of "normal" or expected scores for patients undergoing each type of esophagectomy procedure and for upper digestive diseases. Data will contribute to creating treatment algorithms for symptom management for upper digestive diseases and for post-operative complications and symptoms as well as contribute to pre-operative education.
Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is regarded as a safe and effective management for resectable EC. Gastric tube is considered to be an ideal substitute for the resected esophagus, and used for cervical esophagogastric anastomoses for digestive tract reconstruction in MIE. However, the tension at the anastomosed area can not be ignored and may cause cervical anastomotic leakage (CAL) in some cases. Continuous neck flexion is a standard post-operative posture after tracheal resection and reconstruction, and aimed to relieve the anastomotic tension. In this study, the investigators attempt to adopt the maneuver in MIE, and observe its effect on relieving the anastomotic tension and decreasing the incidence of CAL.
Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is regarded as a safe and effective management for resectable EC. Gastric tube is considered to be an ideal substitute for the resected esophagus and can be lifted to the neck for anastomosis through two different paths — Trans-substernal and trans-esophageal bed routes. However, the differences of operative outcomes between the two paths have not been systematically described. In this study, clinical outcomes including intra- and post-operative status, morbidity and complications, nutrition status, as well as quality of life after surgery will be evaluated, and differences between the trans-substernal and trans-esophageal bed groups will be compared. The study might help to individualization treatment for EC.
Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a technically complex procedure which is associated with high perioperative mortality, even in high volume centers[1]. To facilitate the postoperative recovery of esophagectomies patients by reducing surgical trauma, an increasing number of surgeons have attempted minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to treat patients with esophageal cancer.[2-10] However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal method for performing an esophagectomy with the minimally invasive surgical technique. In addition, the benefit of this approach has not been well confirmed based on the limited retrospective comparative studies at the present time [3, 11-12], although its potential benefit improving the immediate postoperative including the total morbidity and pulmonary complication has been demonstrated by meta-analyses[13]. Especially it is unclear whether adding laparoscopic procedures in MIE can contribute to further improvement of the perioperative outcome of the patients.[3] Previously, the investigators have found that adding of laparoscopic procedure in performing the esophageal reconstruction procedure after VATS esophagectomy can provide further benefit in reducing the postoperative major complications and fasten the postoperative recovery16. For the most cases, the patients was receiving tri-incision esophagectomy, i.e. VATS esophagectomy in the chest, laparoscopic gastric mobilization in the abdomen and left cervical esophagogastrostomy. In such circumstances, a cervical incision was required for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy and gastric mobilization. However, for the patients with lower-to mid third esophageal cancer, some surgeon performed Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, which performing the esophagogastrostomy in the chest after gastric mobilization without cervical incision wound. Although both of these procedures have been demonstrated to be feasible and safe, there is much debate about the advantage and disadvantage of these two approaches. For tri-incision esophagectomy, patients have the chance to have cervical lymph node dissection and the esophagus can be resected up to the neck. However, it is more time-consuming and associated with more surgical trauma by adding a cervical incisional wound and more tissue dissection around the cervical trachea as compared to that done by Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. In contrast, for the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, the resection of esophagus was limited to the level of thoracic inlet and cervical lymph node dissection was impossible unless a neck incision was further created. However, it takes less time in performing the whole procedure by saving a neck incision.
The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to compare clinical outcomes from two different patient position(prone vs left decubitus)with thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization in the procedure of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE). - Comparing morbidities from the two groups - Comparing short-term quality of life from the two groups - Comparing oncological results (3,5 year survival) from the two groups