Esophageal Variceal Rebleeding Clinical Trial
| Verified date | March 2009 |
| Source | National Science Council, Taiwan |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | Taiwan: Department of Health |
| Study type | Interventional |
BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed that the combination of endoscopic therapy with
vasoconstrictor is better than either vasoconstrictor or endoscopic therapy alone in
achieving the successful hemostatsis of acute variceal bleeding. The rationale of using
vasoconstrictor is to enhance the efficacy of hemostasis by endoscopic therapy. Nowadays,
endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has replaced endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) as
the endoscopic treatment of choice in the arresting of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage.
EVL alone can achieve hemotasis up to 97% even in cases of active variceal hemorrhage.
However, early rebleeding due to ligation-induced ulcer may be encountered. It appears that
prevention of esophageal ulcers and bleeding by a proton pump inhibitor may be more logical
than using a vasoconstrictor after cessation of bleeding by EVL.
Thus, the investigators designed a controlled trial to compare the initial hemostasis, early
rebleeding rate in cirrhotic patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding receiving
either emergency EVL plus vasoconstrictor infusion or losec infusion for 5 days.
| Status | Enrolling by invitation |
| Enrollment | 120 |
| Est. completion date | December 2009 |
| Est. primary completion date | November 2009 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. The etiology of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. 2. Age ranges between 18-80 y/o. 3. Patients presenting with acute esophageal variceal bleeding proven by emergency endoscopy within 12 hours. (Acute esophageal variceal bleeding was defined as: - when blood was directly seen by endoscopy to issue from an esophageal varix (active bleeding) OR - when patients presented with red color signs on their esophageal varices with blood in esophagus or stomach and no other potential site of bleeding identified (inactive bleeding). 4. EVL is performed after confirmation of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Enrollment time: Immediately after EVL is completed and variceal bleeding is arrested. Exclusion criteria: 1. association with severe systemic illness, such as sepsis, COPD, uremia 2. association with gastric variceal bleeding 3. failure in the control of bleeding by emergency EVL 4. moribund patients, died within 12 hours of enrollment 5. Uncooperative 6. Ever received EIS, EVL within one month prior to index bleeding 7. Child-Pugh's scores > 10 |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | |||
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| National Science Council, Taiwan |
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | very early rebleeding | 5 days | Yes | |
| Secondary | mortality, complications | 42 days | Yes |