Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is being done to see which treatment is more effective in improving the difficulty of swallowing. Researchers are comparing self-dilation to endoscopic dilation.


Clinical Trial Description

Benign esophageal strictures can be challenging condition to treat. The mainstay of treatment is endoscopic dilations. However, 30 to 40% of these strictures recur despite rigorous dilations. Although a consensus definition does not exist, a stricture is typically termed as a refractory benign esophageal stricture (RBES), when there is a failure to maintain luminal patency after at least 5 endoscopic dilations. Patients with RBES are extremely difficult to manage and the current armamentarium includes repeated endoscopic dilations, corticosteroid or mitomycin C injections, incisional therapy, and/ or temporary stent placement. These procedures are costly, their efficacy can be short-lived, and are associated with great burden both for the patient and clinician. Esophageal self -dilation therapy (ESDT) is where the patient learns to pass a polyvinyl dilator orally on a routine basis. In past, smaller studies, ESDT appears to be effective for RBES, reducing the number of endoscopic dilations from an average of 21.7 to an average of 1. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03738566
Study type Interventional
Source Mayo Clinic
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date November 21, 2018
Completion date May 15, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00667524 - Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Influence of Dilation on Dysphagia and Inflammation N/A