Definitive Radiochemotherapy Plus/Minus Cetuximab in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

Definitive Radiochemotherapy With 5-FU / Cisplatin Plus/Minus Cetuximab in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: a Phase II Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01787006
• Other study ID #: LEOPARD II
• Secondary ID: 2010-023427-18
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: September 2011
• Est. completion date: September 6, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: March 2020
• Source: University of Schleswig-Holstein
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor. Treatment options are various and range from chemotherapy to radiotherapy and several surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates for this disease remain poor.

During the last years the combination of cetuximab with standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy has mainly be investigated in clinical trials focusing on colorectal and/or head and neck cancer.

The results obtained from theses studies were very encouraging and led to the initiation of active clinical research in esophageal cancer patients with antibody inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

The first data in this indication are encouraging showing that cetuximab can safely be added to chemoradiation for esophageal cancer patients with first hints of efficacy.

Based on the experiences with cetuximab in colorectal cancer and in combination with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of a combined treatment of cetuximab with continuous infusional 5-FU, cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and to assess if the overall survival rates can be increased by addition of an EGFR-targeted therapy.

Description:

Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive neoplasm which is fatal in the great majority of patients. On a global basis, cancer of the esophagus is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In fact, gastric and esophageal cancers together accounted for nearly 1.3 million new cases and 980,000 deaths worldwide in 2000 - more than lung, breast, or colorectal cancer. With advances in surgical techniques and treatment, the prognosis of esophageal cancer has slowly improved over the past decades. However, with a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 14%, at the time of development of the LEOPARD-II protocol, survival was poor, even in comparison with the dismal survival rates (4%) from the 1970s. Underlying reasons for this disappointingly low survival rate are above all the difficulties in cancer detection at an advanced stage, with over 50% of patients with unresectable disease or distant metastasis at presentation and the limited survival achieved with palliative chemotherapy alone for patients with metastatic or unresectable disease.

Clearly, additional strategies are needed to improve the systemic treatment options for esophageal cancer.

The optimal treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, a potentially curable disease, is controversial. Through several non-randomized cooperative group trials, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation or surgery alone represent acceptable standards of care for patients with resectable tumors.

Metastatic or unresectable esophageal cancer is found at presentation in more than 50% of patients and is considered incurable. At the time of protocol development, chemotherapy was palliative, improving quality of life and dysphagia in 60%-80% of patients. Typical clinical and radiographic responses lasted for fewer than 4 months, with a median overall survival time of 8-10 months.

Combination chemotherapies have been demonstrated to be superior to best supportive care and chemotherapy given as a single agent, with occasional patients achieving complete responses (0%-11%). However, even with the combination regimens, the median survival time remained less than 10 months.

An improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer has facilitated the development of novel agents designed to target critical pathways involved in cancer development and progression. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a crucial role in tumour growth. EGFR-dependent signaling is involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastatic spread.

The overexpression of EGFR has repeatedly been shown to predict poor prognosis in both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastro esophageal junction adenocarcinoma. EGFR blockade through monoclonal antibodies (Cetuximab, Matuzumab and Panitumumab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib) has translated into promising evidence of clinical benefit in clinical trials.

Cetuximab is a targeted therapeutic agent, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the EGFR with high affinity, internalising the receptor and preventing ligands from interacting with the receptors and thus effectively blocking ligand-induced EGFR phosphorylation. In addition, cetuximab had been found to potentiate the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in experimental systems. The dose of cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2 and subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m2) has been found to be generally safe and effective in several studies in major tumor types expressing the EGFR. These included colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with cetuximab given either in combination studies with chemotherapy and radiotherapy or as monotherapy.

In two phase I studies prior to LEOPARD-II, EGFR-directed antibodies had shown activity in patients with esophageal cancer. In the phase I study of the humanized EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) EMD72000, one patient with metastatic, pretreated squamous cell carcinoma had had a durable, 6-month partial response.

In addition, a phase I trial with a fully human EGFR mAb, had reported stable disease for 7 months in one esophageal cancer patient. Preclinical and these early clinical studies suggested potential activity and minimal toxicities with EGFR antibodies for esophageal cancer.

Furthermore, a randomised phase II compared cisplatin + 5-FU (CF) to cisplatin + 5-FU + cetuximab (CET-CF) (n=62). Cetuximab did not increase grade 3/4 toxicity, except for rash (6% versus 0%) and diarrhea (16% versus 0%). The overall response rates were 19% and 13% for the CET-CF and CF arms respectively, and the disease control rates were 75% and 57%, respectively. The median progression free survival was 5.9 and 3.6 months and median overall survival 9.5 and 5.5 months for CET-CF and CF, respectively.

With respect to the combination of Cetuximab with radiotherapy, preclinical studies have shown, that Cetuximab enhanced the radiosensitivity of EGFR expressing tumour cells in vitro and in tumour xenografts and the repopulation of epithelial tumour cells after exposure to radiation was related to the activation and expression of EGFR. Cetuximab also enhanced the efficacy of docetaxel chemoradiotherapy in human adenocarcinoma xenografts.

Rationale for the LEOPARD-II study Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor and one of the most frequent malignant diseases worldwide.

Treatment options are various and range from chemotherapy to radiotherapy and several surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates for this disease remain poor. During the last years before protocol development the combination of cetuximab with standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy had mainly been investigated in clinical trials focusing on colorectal and/or head and neck cancer. The results obtained from these studies had been very encouraging and led to the initiation of active clinical research in esophageal cancer patients with antibody inhibition of the EGFR. The first data in this indication were encouraging showing that cetuximab could safely be added to chemoradiation for esophageal cancer patients with first hints of efficacy. Based on the experiences with cetuximab in colorectal cancer and in combination with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer, the aim of the LEOPARD-II study was to evaluate the feasibility of a combined treatment of cetuximab with continuous infusional 5-FU, cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and to assess if the overall survival rates could be increased by addition of an EGFR-targeted therapy.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 74
• Est. completion date: September 6, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: September 6, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Dated and signed written informed consent

• Male or female patients between 18 years and 75 years; patients > 75 years if their karnofsky performance status is = 80.

• Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus which is not curatively resectable. Resectability has to be defined by a surgeon before radiochemotherapy. The tumor is considered unresectable due to T-stage, N-stage, performance status, nutritional status, co-morbidity (pulmonal function, other), tumor location upper third or other reasons

• Karnofsky Performance Status = 70

• Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test

• Adequate cardial-, pulmonal- and ear function

Adequate bone marrow function:

• leukocytes = 3.0 x 10^9/L

• neutrophiles = 1.5 x 10^9/L

• thrombocytes = 100 x 10^9/L

• hemoglobin = 10.0 g/dl

Adequate liver function:

• bilirubin = 2.0 mg/dl

• transaminases (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), gamma-GT) = 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)

Adequate kidney function:

• serum creatinine = 1.5 mg/dl

• creatinine clearance = 50 ml/min according to Cockcroft-Gault Formula

• no known allergies against chimeric antibodies

• effective contraception for male and female patients if there is a risk of conception

Exclusion Criteria:

• distant metastasis

• previous treatment of esophageal cancer

• previous therapy with monoclonal antibodies and / or EGFR-targeted therapy

• previous second malignancies with exception of a history of a previous curatively treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or pre-invasive cervix carcinoma

• serious concomitant disease or medical condition

• lung function: forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)) < 1.1

• clinically relevant coronary artery diseases or known myocardial infarction within the last 12 months or ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below normal

• every active dermatological condition > grade 1

• contraindications to receive cisplatin, 5-FU or cetuximab

• concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs or participation in another clinical trial within 30 days before study start

• patient pregnant or breast feeding

• known drug abuse, medication abuse, alcohol abuse

• social situations limiting the compliance with the study requirements

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Esophageal Cancer
• Esophageal Neoplasms

Intervention

Drug:
• Cetuximab
Initial doses 400mg/m2 (day 1), followed by weekly doses of 250mg/m2 for 14 weeks in total
• Cisplatin, 5-FU
5-FU: 1000mg/m2 per day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 of cycle 1 and 2, 750mg/m2/day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 of cycle 3 and 4 Cisplatin 20mg/m2/day as intravenous bolus over 60 min on day 1-4 of every cycle

Radiation:
• Radiotherapy
59.4 Gy (33 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 6.5-7 weeks (5 x 1.8 Gy per week)on primary tumor. 50.4 Gy on locoregional lymphnodes. If resectability is reached after 4-4.5 weeks (36-41.4 Gy) the radiotherapy stops after 45 Gy and the patient undergoes surgery.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Strahlentherapie	Lübeck

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Schleswig-Holstein

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive at 2 Years	Overall Survival (OS) was defined as freedom from death of any cause. Time to death was calculated from the day of randomization, and the patients were followed for a maximum of 24 months (2 years).	2 years
Secondary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive at 1 Year	Overall Survival (OS) was defined as freedom from death of any cause. Time to death was calculated from the day of randomization.	1 year
Secondary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Progression of Disease at 1 Year	For progression-free survival (PFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of radiologically proven progression or clinical progression or death due to progressive disease. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.	1 year
Secondary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Progression of Disease at 2 Years	For progression-free survival (PFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of radiologically proven progression or clinical progression or death due to progressive disease. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.	2 years
Secondary	Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade >=3 Toxicity	Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4.03).	up to 2 years
Secondary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Distant Metastases at 1 Year	For metastases-free survival (MFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of distant metastasis. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.	1 year
Secondary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Distant Metastases at 2 Years	For metastases-free survival (MFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of distant metastasis. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.	2 years
Secondary	Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least Partial Response (Responders)	Response was defined according to the RECIST criteria (Version 1.1) based on the assessments (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or other) for target lesions, non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions.; The best overall response (RECIST) was chosen for each patient out of all valid tumour assessments before start of next-line therapy (complete response=CR being the best and progressive disease=PD the worst). Frequencies with percentages were to be given for each category (CR, partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), PD) by treatment group. The data were to be presented as the dichotomous endpoint of objective response, for which patients with best overall response of CR or PR were considered as responders, and those with best overall response of SD or PD as non-responders. The difference between objective response rates in the two treatment arms was to be compared with a Chi-square test.	up to 2 years
Secondary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Loco-regional Failure at 1 Year	Loco-regional failure was defined as progressive primary tumor and/or regional lymph nodes on endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound or computed tomography.Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.	1 year
Secondary	Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Loco-regional Failure at 2 Years	Loco-regional failure was defined as progressive primary tumor and/or regional lymph nodes on endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound or computed tomography. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.	2 years
Secondary	Change in Quality of Life Between Baseline and End of Treatment (After 5 to 13 Weeks)	Quality of Life was assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 questionnaires. For QLQ-C30, global health status, functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning) and symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties) were calculated. Scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher scores represented higher levels of quality of life, functioning, or symptoms/problems. Score were calculated using mean values.; For QLQ-OES18, symptom scales (problems with eating, reflux, pain, problems swallowing saliva, dry mouth, taste disorders, problems while coughing or speaking) and functional scale (dysphagia) were assessed the same way.; A change between two time points, i.e. baseline (prior to treatment) and end of treatment (after 5 to 13 weeks, depending on treatment arm (6.5 weeks without and 13 weeks with cetuximab) and achievement of resectability (end of treatment after 5 weeks), is reported.	end of treatment (after 5 to 13 weeks)