Esophageal Anastomotic Leak Clinical Trial
— APIL_2013Official title:
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on Delay Phenomenon Utility in Preventing Oesophagogastric Anastomotic Dehiscence After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy. Pilot Study.
NCT number | NCT02432794 |
Other study ID # | APIL_2013 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 2015 |
Est. completion date | June 2019 |
Verified date | August 2019 |
Source | Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a randomized clinical trial to clarify if the delay phenomenon could reduce the incidence of oesophagogastric dehiscence after an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer comparing an experimental group vs control group. The delay phenomenon will be performed by an arteriographic approach.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 44 |
Est. completion date | June 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - All patients requiring a subtotal esophagectomy with en-bloc resection and an intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy for esophageal cancer - 18 or above years old - Acceptance and signing the full informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Absence of pancreatitis - Anatomic vascular alteration that contraindicate the embolization (congenital celiac trunk stenosis, presence of arcuate ligament,etc,..) - refuse to collaborate in the study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Leandre Farran Teixidor | L'Hospitalet De Llobregat | Barcelona |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge |
Spain,
Akiyama S, Kodera Y, Sekiguchi H, Kasai Y, Kondo K, Ito K, Takagi H. Preoperative embolization therapy for esophageal operation. J Surg Oncol. 1998 Dec;69(4):219-23. — View Citation
Boyle NH, Pearce A, Hunter D, Owen WJ, Mason RC. Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry and intraluminal recirculating gas tonometry in the assessment of gastric and jejunal perfusion during oesophageal resection. Br J Surg. 1998 Oct;85(10):1407-11. — View Citation
Farran L, Miro M, Alba E, Bettonica C, Aranda H, Galan M, Rafecas A. Preoperative gastric conditioning in cervical gastroplasty. Dis Esophagus. 2011 May;24(4):205-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01115.x. Epub 2010 Oct 11. — View Citation
Farran Teixidor L, Llop Talaverón J, Galán Guzmán M, Aranda Danso H, Miró Martín M, Bettónica Larrañaga C, Estremiana García F, Biondo S. [Surgical outcomes of esophageal cancer resection since the development of an Oesophagogastric Tumour Board]. Cir Esp — View Citation
González-González JJ, Sanz-Alvarez L, Marqués-Alvarez L, Navarrete-Guijosa F, Martínez-Rodríguez E. [Complications of surgical resection of esophageal cancer]. Cir Esp. 2006 Dec;80(6):349-60. Review. Spanish. — View Citation
Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Mar;194(3):285-97. — View Citation
Isomura T, Itoh S, Endo T, Akiyama S, Maruyama K, Ishiguchi T, Ishigaki T, Takagi H. Efficacy of gastric blood supply redistribution by transarterial embolization: preoperative procedure to prevent postoperative anastomotic leaks following esophagoplasty — View Citation
Lamas S, Azuara D, de Oca J, Sans M, Farran L, Alba E, Escalante E, Rafecas A. Time course of necrosis/apoptosis and neovascularization during experimental gastric conditioning. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(4):370-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00772.x. — View Citation
Liebermann-Meffert DM, Meier R, Siewert JR. Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992 Dec;54(6):1110-5. — View Citation
Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallböhmer D, Maish M, DeMeester TR, Hölscher AH. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(4):310-4. Review. — View Citation
Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992 Mar;49(3):163-7. — View Citation
Schröder W, Beckurts KT, Stähler D, Stützer H, Fischer JH, Hölscher AH. Microcirculatory changes associated with gastric tube formation in the pig. Eur Surg Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;34(6):411-7. — View Citation
Schröder W, Hölscher AH, Bludau M, Vallböhmer D, Bollschweiler E, Gutschow C. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with and without laparoscopic conditioning of the gastric conduit. World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):738-43. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0403-x. — View Citation
Urschel JD. Ischemic conditioning of the rat stomach: implications for esophageal replacement with stomach. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1995 Apr;36(2):191-3. — View Citation
Yuan Y, Duranceau A, Ferraro P, Martin J, Liberman M. Vascular conditioning of the stomach before esophageal reconstruction by gastric interposition. Dis Esophagus. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(8):740-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01311.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Anastomotic leakage | investigators will consider anastomotic dehiscence the presence of one or more of the following conditions: radiologic confirmation by water-soluble contrast study (gastrografin administered orally) or thoracoabdominal Tc with oral contrast of dehiscence of oesophagogastric anastomosis or the stapler end of the gastroplasty. When the clinical conditions of patient don't allow a Rx control investigators will consider an anastomotic leakage in these conditions: Thoracic drain output of oesophagogastric content with amylase > 40 ukAT/L, confirmation of anastomotic dehiscence by the surgeon during a reintervention, endoscopic confirmation of anastomotic leakage of the stapled end of the plasty and methylene blue output after oral administration (100 ml of water with 10ml of methylene blue) |
7 days | |
Secondary | plasty ischemia | investigators will consider plasty ischemia when one or more of the following criteria is present: endoscopic evidence of gastric mucosa ischemia evidence of low captation of the plasty in a thoracoabdominal CT with endovenous contrast that requires a reintervention. intraoperative mortality (during hospitalization and/or 30 days after surgery). |
7 days | |
Secondary | hospital stay | investigators will consider since the day of the surgery until the day the patient will be discharged from the hospital | 90 days | |
Secondary | major and minor morbidity | investigators will evaluate morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification | 90 days | |
Secondary | postoperative mortality | during hospitalization and/or 30 days after surgery | ||
Secondary | post-embolization morbidity | investigators will consider post-embolization morbidity the following situations: abdominal pain with EVA>3 (evaluated by EVA classification ) pancreatitis diagnosed by abdominal pain and amylase > 5 uKat/L or by CT. abscess, pseudocyst diagnosed by CT or during oesophageal surgery spleen ischemia diagnosed by CT or abdominal ultrasound and needs some treatment liver ischemia diagnosed by Ct or abdominal ultrasound bleeding or artery dissection diagnosed during the embolization and needs some treatment arterial pseudoaneurism diagnosed during the embolization or by CT |
30 days | |
Secondary | anastomotic stricture | investigators will consider anastomotic stricture when they observe a reduction of anastomotic diameter by oral contrast Rx and needs some treatment (endoscopic dilation or reintervention) | 6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04268654 -
Ischemic Conditioning of the Gastric Conduit in Esophageal Cancer.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03847857 -
Study of Porcine Fibrin Sealant in Preventing Cervical Anastomotic Leakage (PLACE030)
|
Phase 3 |