Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if patients remaining different positions for 30min after receiving ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block influenced the postoperative analgesia. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does patients maintain prone position or supine position for 30 min after ESPB provided superior analgesic effect than in the supine position? Is ESPB not inferior to PVB considering postoperative opioid consumption ? Researchers will compare the opioid consumption 24h postoperatively among the patients remaining supine, lateral, prone position after ESPB and PVB to see if patients maintaining lateral or prone position provided excellent postoperative analgesia. Participants will: Maintaining supine lateral or prone position for 30 min following ESPB or receiving PVB. Receiving postoperative NRS and QoR assessment


Clinical Trial Description

After signed the informed consent form, 120 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic lobectomy were randomly divided into four groups: supine position group (group S, n = 30), prone position group (group P, n = 30), lateral position group (group L, n = 30) and paravertebral block group (group C, n = 30). After ESPB block, the corresponding position was maintained for 30 minutes. Ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed 30min before general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided ESPB methods: The ultrasonic high-frequency linear array probe (5-13 MHZ, Sonosite, USA) was placed parallel to the spine on the surface of the transverse process tip of the fifth thoracic vertebra. Under ultrasound, the transverse process and the surface of the erector spinae were clearly exposed. Then a short beved-plane needle was used, and the needle was inserted from the head side. 2ml of normal saline was injected using the water separation technique to confirm the position of the needle tip, and then 30ml 0.375% ropivacaine was injected. After completion of the block, patients in group S were kept in the supine position for 30min, patients in group L were kept in the upper lateral position for 30min, and patients in group P were kept in the prone position for 30min. After 30 minutes of observation, an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the grouping used an ice cube to determine the extent of sensory block. General anesthesia was then performed. General anesthesia was performed as follows: routine ECG monitoring was performed after the patient was admitted to the operating room, and invasive arterial blood pressure was monitored by radial artery puncture and catheterization. General anesthesia was induced with dexamethasone 10mg, midazolam 0.5mg.kg-1, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg.kg-1, sufentanil 0.4 mg.kg-1, cisatracurium 0.2 mg.kg-1, and then a double-luminal bronchial tube was inserted under a video laryngoscope and mechanically ventilated (tidal volume: 6ml.kg-1,PEEP: 3-5 cm H2O). Anesthesia was maintained with propofol (2-4 mg.kg-1.h-1), remifentanil (0.12-0.2 mg.kg-1.min-1) and miuclosamine (0.2mg.kg-1. Intraoperative hemodynamics was maintained within 30% of baseline. Flurbiprofen axetil 50mg was given intravenously for analgesia and tropisetron 4mg was given to prevent nausea and vomiting when there were no contraindications during the operation. Intraoperative infusion was limited to 6ml.kg-1.h-1. Oxycodone 3mg was administered intravenously 30min before the end of the procedure. At the end of the operation, the patient was transferred to PACU with an endotracheal tube. After neuromuscular blocking antagonism, the tracheal tube was extubated. NRS was used to evaluate the pain scores at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24h ,48h after operation by a nurse who was unaware of the grouping. Oxycodone 30mg diluted to 150ml was used for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after operation. The parameters of analgesia pump were set as background dose 1ml.h-1, bolus 5ml, lockout time 8min. If NRS≥4 at rest after surgery, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was performed by pressing the PCA pump. When NRS≥4 at rest was still ≥4 after two times of PCA, oxycodone 1mg was given once as rescue analgesia, and the patients were reevaluated until NRS≤3. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT06441071
Study type Interventional
Source Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
Contact Xinyi Bu, MD
Phone +8618360868010
Email 1037031075@qq.com
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date June 14, 2024
Completion date December 1, 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04110210 - Effectiveness of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Early Phase 1
Completed NCT03652103 - Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06088836 - Ultrasound- Guided Continuous Retro Laminar Block Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block in Multiple Rib Fractures N/A
Recruiting NCT04403360 - Erector Spinae Plane Block After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05625009 - Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (Tap) Block and Erector Spinal Plane (Esp) Block N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06127966 - The Relationship Between NLR and PONV and ESPB Phase 1
Completed NCT06143020 - Effect of ESPB on Postoperative Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer Implant Reconstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT05158270 - Erector Spinae Plane Block As Alternative Analgesic Modality in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04845711 - Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT06377605 - The Efficacy of Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block For Perioperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery for Super Obese Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial. N/A
Recruiting NCT06233617 - Dexamethasone vs. Dexmedetomidine for ESPB in Pain Management After Spine Surgery Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT04757480 - Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Versus Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block In Lumbar Laminectomy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04474873 - Effectivenes of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? N/A
Recruiting NCT03887260 - Clinical Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Peri-operative Analgesia for Nephrectomy/Nephron Sparing Surgery(NSS) Performed Via Lumbotomy N/A
Completed NCT05083832 - Effect of Two Different Plane Blocks on Post-thoracotomy Pain N/A
Completed NCT05121727 - Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Combination of Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block N/A
Recruiting NCT05970380 - Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Scheduled for Kyphoplasty
Not yet recruiting NCT05409144 - Impact of Thoracic Epidural Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block on Incidence of PTPS N/A
Completed NCT03968146 - Erector Spinae Plane Block in Scoliotic Adolescents Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04420104 - Errector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A