View clinical trials related to Epstein-Barr Virus Infections.
Filter by:This study aims to investigate the effect of EBV reactivation or EBV reactivation added with dexamethasone(DXM) in patients with adverse drug reactions(CDR) , through evaluating the levels on monocyte, macrophage M2/M1 and cytokines. To investigate whether expression of EBV receptors EphA2 could specifically influence on EBV activation in CDRs. We performed a prospective longitudinal study on the frequencies of Monocyte, Macrophage, M2/M1 and cytokines included IL-4,IL-13,TNF-α,IFN-γ,IFN-β, CXCL9 and CXCL10 after onset of MPE ,SJS/TEN and control groups. PBMCs collected from peripheral blood were cocultured with EBV or EBV with DXM. We next examined whether EBV or EBV with DXM could have a strong impact on the MOs, Mac, M2/M1 and cytokines and which cytokines could be crucial for the interaction between M2/M1 and EBV, by in vitro cocultures. Finally, EphA2 were detected to evaluate reactivation of EBV.
This will be a cross sectional, pilot study to determine the burden of EBV related lymphomas in this population. Patient information including demographics and HIV status, history of HIV infection, HIV viral load and CD4 counts and ART history will be retrieved from the integrated patient management system (IPMS) Lymph node excision biopsy samples, collected at NHL between 2012 and 2017, from the patient with a diagnosis of lymphoma will be retrieved using IPMS from National Health Laboratory and analyzed by immunohistochemistry.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of mRNA-1195 in healthy adults (18 to 55 years of age).
The main objective of Part A of this trial is to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of mRNA-1189 in 18- to 30-year-old healthy adults and the main objective of Part B is to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of mRNA-1189 in 12- to <18-year-old EBV-seronegative healthy adolescents.
Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes most cases of infectious mononucleosis (mono). Up to 1 in 10 people who get mono can have fatigue that lasts more than 6 months. One out of 100 people can have severe complications. EBV is also associated with several types of cancer. Researchers want to test an EBV vaccine. Objective: To test the safety of and immune response to a new vaccine against EBV. Eligibility: Healthy adults ages 18-29 Design: Participants will be screened with a medical history and physical exam. They will give a blood sample. Screening tests will be repeated during the study. Participants will get a dose of the study vaccine as an injection in a muscle in the upper arm. They will be observed for 30 to 60 minutes. Blood pressure, heart rate, breathing rate, and temperature will be checked. The injection site will be examined. Participants will get a diary card. They will write down any side effects they have after the vaccine dose, or they may use an electronic diary card. Participants will be asked to write down or enter any important medical events that may occur at any time during the study. Participants will get a vaccine dose at 2 more study visits. They will have 4 follow-up visits at different times after a vaccine dose. Participants will have 6 telephone calls in between the in-person visits. They will also have 1 telephone call 1 year after the third dose of vaccine. If possible, this visit can occur in person. Participation will last about 18 months. There is an optional in-person visit or telephone call 2 years after the third dose of vaccine.
The investigators aim to investigate whether incorporating on-treatment EBV DNA surveillance for monitoring tumor responses to treatment and for guiding individuliased treatment adaptation can improve prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient . For patients with detectable EBV DNA after one cycle of IC, which then drops to undetectable levels during the following IC cycles (intermediate responders/intermediate relapse risk), the investigators aim to investigate whether additional adjuvant metronomic capecitabine would benefit this subgroup. For patients with detectable EBV DNA after three cycles of IC or with EBV DNA bounce during the induction phase (insensitive to IC/high relapse risk), the investigators aim to investigate whether concurrent administration of anti-PD-1 therapy during the following treatment phases (including concurrent phase and adjuvant phase) can benefit this subgroup.
Endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is invariably associated with Epstein-barr virus (EBV) infection. Plasma EBV DAN detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays can provide important informations of disease screening, disease relapse, and risks classification. In this study, the investigators will explore the impact of serial plasma EBV DNA during chemotherapy and radiotherapy on initial tumor response and long-term survival in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether virus-specific T cell lines (VSTs) are safe and can effectively control three viruses (EBV, CMV, and adenovirus) in patients who have had a stem cell transplant and also in patients that have a primary immunodeficiency disorder with no prior stem cell transplant.
There are two study questions we are asking in this randomized phase II/III trial based on a blood biomarker, Epstein Barr virus (EBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) for locoregionally advanced non-metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer. All patients will first undergo standard concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. When this standard treatment is completed, if there is no detectable EBV DNA in their plasma, then patients are randomized to either standard adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy or observation. If there is still detectable levels of plasma EBV DNA, patients will be randomized to standard cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy versus gemcitabine and paclitaxel. Radiation therapy uses high energy x rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, fluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride, and paclitaxel work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving cisplatin and fluorouracil is more effective than gemcitabine hydrochloride and paclitaxel after radiation therapy in treating patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.
The purpose of this study is to determine if the screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA analysis would result in the detecting NPC cases at earlier stages and improve survival.