Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has specific rules which generic drug companies must follow to get a generic copy of a seizure medication approved. Currently, FDA approves generic drugs by requiring studies on normal volunteers who don't have epilepsy and who take just one dose of the generic drug followed by a series of blood tests. Some people with epilepsy and their physicians have complained about side effects or loss of seizure control when taking generic drugs, but no one knows if these complaints are truly because of problems with the generic drugs.

This research is to determine whether several different generic versions and the brand version of the medication lamotrigine perform in a similar way when given to people with epilepsy.

The study drug Lamictal® (lamotrigine) and both of the generic forms of lamotrigine to be tested are approved by the FDA for the treatment of seizures.


Clinical Trial Description

The study proposed in this protocol will determine if bioequivalence testing performed for the FDA translates into similar bioequivalence in a population of people with epilepsy when switching among different generics of the anti-epileptic drug (AED). Based on a variety of pharmacokinetic (PK) data and clinical reports of concern, the example anti epilepsy drug (AED) used for this study will be lamotrigine (LTG).

In this single dose study, people with epilepsy taking AEDs, but not currently taking the test medication, lamotrigine, will be studied. We will use an order-randomized three-sequence six-period replicate design with the two most disparate generics studied in two replicate periods each and the brand (reference) product studied in two additional periods. A standard single dose of the test drug (lamotrigine 25mg) will be administered under controlled conditions (fasting with subsequent standardized meals) with a 12-hour in-facility blood sample collection followed by a collection every 24 hours for a total of a 96 hour sample collection that will be used to establish the pharmacokinetic measures of Cmax, AUC96 and AUC∞. Each period will be separated by at least a 12 day washout interval.

The replicate studies will be used to determine the intra-individual variability of the pharmacokinetic responses of the brand and the two generic products, as well as subject-by-formulation interaction variances. The data will also be used to calculate simultaneously all parameters that are needed to compare the 3 products in average and individual bioequivalence and outlier analyses. The differences between the disparate generics will be used to establish if the current standards translate to equivalence within the limits of the brand intra-subject variation.

The factors we will use to determine the most disparate generics include the results from the in vivo data from the ABE studies submitted to the FDA in the ANDA and in vitro chemical assay (potency) and dissolution data performed on several currently available lots. The intent is to study the specific lot of the generic product predicted to result in the lowest levels and compare it to the specific lot from another generic product predicted to result in the highest levels. Similarly, if multiple lots of the brand products are available, we will perform in vitro testing to establish the most desirable lot to study.

Factors that alter metabolism, including concomitant AEDs that may have hepatic enzyme induction effects will be tracked but not excluded, as long as the dose remains constant, as the goal is to reproduce the 'real life' situation as closely as possible within the practical limits of funding and study size. Subjects receiving valproate as concomitant medication will be excluded because the prolongation of half life would not allow LTG to reliably be completely cleared by 13 days. The criteria that establish an enriched population will also be tracked and used in a secondary analysis, but will not be used as an inclusion requirement. The enriched population is defined as people who experienced an otherwise unexplained increase in seizures or adverse effects, or a substantial change in AED level after a switch in AED products.

The discovery of any subject-by-formulation interaction outliers (i.e. subjects with differential pharmacokinetic reactions to a pair of formulations) will raise considerable concerns about equivalence. Recently established methods in the statistical analysis of outliers in crossover studies will be used to determine if any outliers are present.

Qualified subjects will be screened and upon fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria and signing the informed consent will be enrolled in the study and enter the randomization phase (2-30 days). Subjects will be randomized according to a sealed allocation list that will be balanced for sequence and provided to each site prior to the first subject enrollment. Subjects that withdraw prior to completing the third period will be replaced in a randomized manner. The randomization list will be generated by the study statistical group. There are six test periods in three sequences for a sequence-randomized study. During two test periods subjects will receive a single dose of the brand AED and during the other four test periods subjects will receive a single dose from one of the two investigated generics (each twice). The single doses will be administered in the fasting state during an in-facility 12-hour pharmacokinetic session to collect samples to determine Cmax and AUCs. Four additional samples will be drawn at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after the dose as an outpatient (making each pharmacokinetic test last for 4 days). Each in-facility pharmacokinetic testing will be separated by a 12-23 day washout period; consistent washout periods of 14 days will be preferred. A final follow-up phone evaluation will be conducted 12-16 days (target 14 days) after the last dose. During the study the subjects will continue their usual concomitant medications, including AEDs, without change.

Investigators will compare the AED levels as measured by Cmax and AUC in each group using average bioequivalence (ABE) and individual bioequivalence (IBE) criteria. Average bioequivalence will be established if the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean of Cmax and AUCs for the most disparate generic products compared to each other are entirely within the 80%-125% range (the FDA criteria for bioequivalence) using the two one-sided standard analyses. Otherwise the products will be considered to not be bioequivalent. Similarly, the products will be considered to not be bioequivalent if the criteria for IBE for each generic product compared to the brand product are not met.

Study Population: Approximately 54 subjects (45 subjects to completion).

Number of centers: 3 sites enrolling approximately 18 subjects each.

Duration of study: Approximately 1 year. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01733394
Study type Interventional
Source University of Cincinnati
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
Start date December 12, 2012
Completion date September 26, 2016

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04595513 - Stopping TSC Onset and Progression 2: Epilepsy Prevention in TSC Infants Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02909387 - Adapting Project UPLIFT for Blacks in Georgia N/A
Completed NCT05552924 - Self Acupressure on Fatigue and Sleep Quality in Epilepsy Patients N/A
Terminated NCT01668654 - Long-term, Open-label Safety Extension Study of Retigabine/Ezogabine in Pediatric Subjects (>= 12 Years Old) With POS or LGS Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT05068323 - Impact of Interictal Epileptiform Activity on Some Cognitive Domains in Newly Diagnosed Epileptic Patients N/A
Completed NCT03994718 - Creative Arts II Study N/A
Recruiting NCT04076449 - Quantitative Susceptibility Biomarker and Brain Structural Property for Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Related Epilepsy
Completed NCT00782249 - Trial Comparing Different Stimulation Paradigms in Patients Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Refractory Epilepsy N/A
Completed NCT03683381 - App-based Intervention for Treating Insomnia Among Patients With Epilepsy N/A
Recruiting NCT05101161 - Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06034353 - Impact of Pharmacist-led Cognitive Behavioral Intervention on Adherence and Quality of Life of Epileptic Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT05769933 - Bridging Gaps in the Neuroimaging Puzzle: New Ways to Image Brain Anatomy and Function in Health and Disease Using Electroencephalography and 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Not yet recruiting NCT06408428 - Glioma Intraoperative MicroElectroCorticoGraphy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05559060 - Comorbidities of Epilepsy(Cognitive and Psychiatric Dysfunction)
Completed NCT02977208 - Impact of Polymorphisms of OCT2 and OCTN1 on the Kinetic Disposition of Gabapentin in Patients Undergoing Chronic Use Phase 4
Completed NCT02646631 - Behavioral and Educational Tools to Improve Epilepsy Care N/A
Completed NCT02952456 - Phenomenological Approach of Epilepsy in Patients With Epilepsy
Recruiting NCT02539134 - TAK-935 Multiple Rising Dose Study in Healthy Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT02491073 - Study to Evaluate Serum Free Thyroxine (FT4) and Free Triiodothyronine (FT3) Measurements for Subjects Treated With Eslicarbazeine Acetate (ESL) N/A
Terminated NCT02757547 - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Epilepsy N/A