Eosinophilic Asthma Clinical Trial
Official title:
A 12-Month, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) in the Reduction of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations in Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma
NCT number | NCT01287039 |
Other study ID # | C38072/3082 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 3 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | April 2011 |
Est. completion date | March 2014 |
Verified date | November 2021 |
Source | Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of treatment with reslizumab in patients with eosinophilic asthma.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 489 |
Est. completion date | March 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 12 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - The patient is male or female, 12 through 75 years of age, with a previous diagnosis of asthma. - The patient has had at least 1 asthma exacerbation requiring oral, intramuscular (im), or intravenous (iv) corticosteroid use for at least 3 days over the past 12 months before screening. - The patient has a current blood eosinophil level of at least 400/µl. - The patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration. - The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5 at the screening and baseline (before the 1st dose of study drug) visits. - The patient is taking inhaled fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 µg, or equivalent, daily. Chronic oral corticosteroid use (no more than 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) is allowed. If a patient is on a stable dose, eg, 2 weeks or more of oral corticosteroid treatment at the time of study enrollment, the patient must remain on this dose throughout the study. The patient's baseline asthma therapy regimen (including but not limited to inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids up to a maximum of 10 mg of prednisone daily or equivalent, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipooxygenase inhibitors, or cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days prior to screening and baseline, and must continue without dosage changes throughout study. - All female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative pregnancy test ß-human chorionic gonadotropin [ß-HCG]) at screening (serum) and baseline (urine). - Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. - Written informed consent is obtained. Patients 12 through 17 years old must provide assent. - The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, ECG evaluation (at screening), serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis. - Other criteria apply; please contact the investigator for more information. Exclusion Criteria: - The patient has a clinically meaningful co-morbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety. - The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome. - The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung cancer). Patients with pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis) will also be excluded. - The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening). - The patient is using systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulating or other biologic agents (including, but not limited to, anti-IgE mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-a, or anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti TNF] mAb) within 6 months prior to screening. - The patient has previously received an anti-hIL-5 monoclonal antibody (eg, reslizumab, mepolizumab, or benralizumab). - The patient has any aggravating medical factors that are inadequately controlled (eg, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and uncontrolled diabetes). - The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening. - The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 6 months prior to screening. - Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or, if of childbearing potential, and not using a medically accepted, effective method of birth control (eg, barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, IUD, or steroidal contraceptive [oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected]) are excluded from this study. NOTE: Partner sterility alone is not considered an acceptable form of birth control. - Other criteria apply; please contact the investigator for more information. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Teva Investigational Site 641 | Clayton | |
Australia | Teva Investigational Site 644 | Daw Park | |
Australia | Teva Investigational Site 642 | Frankston | |
Australia | Teva Investigational Site 645 | Liverpool | |
Australia | Teva Investigational Site 643 | Nedlands | Western Australia |
Belgium | Teva Investigational Site 261 | Bruxelles | |
Belgium | Teva Investigational Site 264 | Bruxelles | |
Belgium | Teva Investigational Site 260 | Gent | |
Belgium | Teva Investigational Site 262 | Jambes | |
Belgium | Teva Investigational Site 263 | Liège | |
Chile | Teva Investigational Site 160 | Rancagua | |
Chile | Teva Investigational Site 163 | Santiago | |
Chile | Teva Investigational Site 164 | Santiago | |
Chile | Teva Investigational Site 165 | Santiago | |
Chile | Teva Investigational Site 161 | Temuco | |
Chile | Teva Investigational Site 162 | Valdivia | |
Chile | Teva Investigational Site 166 | Valparaiso | |
Colombia | Teva Investigational Site 185 | Bogota | |
Colombia | Teva Investigational Site 181 | Bogotá | |
Colombia | Teva Investigational Site 182 | Cali | |
Colombia | Teva Investigational Site 180 | Floridablanca | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 284 | Breclav | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 287 | Brno | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 286 | Liberec | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 280 | Olomouc | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 281 | Olomouc | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 285 | Olomouc | |
Czechia | Teva Investigational Site 283 | Tabor | |
Denmark | Teva Investigational Site 301 | Hvidovre | |
Denmark | Teva Investigational Site 300 | Odense | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 401 | Balassagyarmat | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 400 | Miskolc | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 404 | Mosonmagyaróvár | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 403 | Sopron | |
Hungary | Teva Investigational Site 405 | Törökbálint | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 423 | Ashkelon | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 430 | Beer-Sheva | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 431 | Haifa | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 432 | Haifa | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 425 | Jerusalem | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 428 | Jerusalem | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 429 | Jerusalem | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 426 | Kfar Saba | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 422 | Petach Tikva | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 427 | Ramat Gan | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 433 | Ramat Gan | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 421 | Rehovot | |
Israel | Teva Investigational Site 420 | Tel-Aviv | |
Malaysia | Teva Investigational Site 705 | Batu Caves | |
Malaysia | Teva Investigational Site 700 | Kuala Lumpur | |
Malaysia | Teva Investigational Site 702 | Kuala Lumpur | |
Malaysia | Teva Investigational Site 703 | Kuantan | |
Malaysia | Teva Investigational Site 701 | Penang | |
Malaysia | Teva Investigational Site 704 | Taiping | |
New Zealand | Teva Investigational Site 723 | Auckland | |
New Zealand | Teva Investigational Site 722 | Christchurch | |
New Zealand | Teva Investigational Site 726 | Christchurch | |
New Zealand | Teva Investigational Site 724 | Dunedin | |
New Zealand | Teva Investigational Site 727 | Hamilton | |
New Zealand | Teva Investigational Site 720 | Tauranga | |
New Zealand | Teva Investigational Site 721 | Wellington | |
Philippines | Teva Investigational Site 744 | Governor Mangubat Drive, Dasma | |
Philippines | Teva Investigational Site 742 | Manila | |
Philippines | Teva Investigational Site 740 | Quezon City | |
Philippines | Teva Investigational Site 741 | Quezon City | |
Philippines | Teva Investigational Site 743 | Quezon City | |
Philippines | Teva Investigational Site 745 | Quezon City | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 507 | Bialystok | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 509 | Bydgoszcz | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 501 | Bystra | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 500 | Ostrow Wielkopolski | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 511 | Poznan | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 502 | Sopot | |
Poland | Teva Investigational Site 504 | Tarnow | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 545 | Barnaul | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 551 | Kazan | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 549 | Kemerovo | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 550 | Nizhniy Novgorod | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 553 | Novosibirsk | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 555 | Novosibirsk | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 542 | St. Petersburg | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 552 | Tomsk | |
Russian Federation | Teva Investigational Site 546 | Yaroslavl | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 581 | Cape Town | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 584 | Cape Town | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 586 | Cape Town | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 587 | Centurion | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 582 | Durban | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 585 | Durban | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 580 | Johannesburg | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 589 | Johannesburg | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 583 | Pretoria | |
South Africa | Teva Investigational Site 588 | Pretoria | |
Sweden | Teva Investigational Site 602 | Göteborg | |
Sweden | Teva Investigational Site 604 | Göteborg | |
Sweden | Teva Investigational Site 603 | Linköping | |
Sweden | Teva Investigational Site 601 | Malmö | |
Thailand | Teva Investigational Site 780 | Bangkok | |
Thailand | Teva Investigational Site 782 | Bangkok | |
Thailand | Teva Investigational Site 783 | Bangkok | |
Thailand | Teva Investigational Site 781 | Muang | |
Thailand | Teva Investigational Site 784 | Nakhon Ratchasima | |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 66 | Altoona | Pennsylvania |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 63 | Boerne | Texas |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 51 | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 64 | Boys Town | Nebraska |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 60 | Bronx | New York |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 31 | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 34 | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 62 | Columbus | Ohio |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 52 | DeBary | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 72 | Houston | Texas |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 49 | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 61 | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 65 | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 33 | Madison | Wisconsin |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 55 | Miami | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 35 | Missoula | Montana |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 32 | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 50 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 37 | Orange | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 38 | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 68 | Rochester | New York |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 74 | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 56 | San Diego | California |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 58 | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 18 | Valrico | Florida |
United States | Teva Investigational Site 30 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. |
United States, Australia, Belgium, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, Hungary, Israel, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Poland, Russian Federation, South Africa, Sweden, Thailand,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Frequency of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs) During 12 Months of Treatment | An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma:
use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means. |
Day 1 to Week 52 | |
Primary | Frequency of Each of the Two Criteria for Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs) | An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma:
use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization. CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals for the two criteria were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means. |
Day 1 to Week 52 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average FEV1 was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. |
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) to Week 16 | The AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were "patient-specific," which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits.
Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in quality of life. |
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Week 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | The ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ACQ was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements.
Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 | |
Secondary | Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to First Clinical Asthma Exacerbation (CAE) | An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma:
use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization. CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. The distributions were compared by a log rank test stratified by baseline usage of oral corticosteroid (yes or no) and geographical region (US or other). |
Day 1 to Day 478 (longest treatment time plus 2 weeks) | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | The ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control; info obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms.
The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ASUI was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement in asthma symptoms. Information was obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms. |
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Use Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit patients were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3.
The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) SABA use was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control. |
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count Over 16 Weeks and 52 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures | Blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test at each scheduled visit, and from all patients experiencing a serious adverse event, an adverse event leading to withdrawal, or an exacerbation of asthma symptoms.
The during treatment average eosinophil counts were estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. Negative change from baseline values correlate to reduced asthma severity. |
Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 or early withdrawal | |
Secondary | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. | Day 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The last postbaseline value for approximately 20 patients in each | |
Secondary | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis values.
Significance criteria: Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L Uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 µmol/L Aspartate aminotransferase: >=3*upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 10-43 U/L Alanine aminotransferase: >=3*ULN. Normal range is 10-40 U/L GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: >= 3*ULN. Normal range is 5-49 U/L. Bilirubin: >=34.2 µmol/L White blood cells: <=3.0 or >20 10^9/L Hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL Hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L Neutrophils: <=1.0 10^9/L Eosinophils: >10.0 % Platelets: <75 or >=700 10^9/L Urinalysis: blood, glucose, ketones and total protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline |
Week 4 to Week 65. The last postbaseline value for approximately 20 patients in each | |
Secondary | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values.
Significance criteria Sitting pulse - high 12-17 yr: >100 and increase of >= 30 beats/minute (bpm) Sitting pulse - low >=18 yr: <50 and decrease of >=30 bpm Sitting pulse - high >=18 yr: >100 and increase of >=30 bpm Sitting systolic blood pressure - low >=18 yr: <90 and decrease of >=30 mmHg Sitting systolic blood pressure - high >=18 yr: >160 and increase of >=30 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low 12-17 yr: <55 and decrease of >=12 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - low >=18 yr: <50 and decrease of >=12 mmHg Sitting diastolic blood pressure - high >=18 yr: >100 and increase of >=12 mmHg Respiratory rate >=18 yr: >24 and increase of >=10 breaths/minute Body temperature - low 12-17 yr: <96.5° Fahrenheit or <35.8° Celsius Body temp - low >=18 yr: <96.5° F or <35.8° C Body temp - high >=18 yr: >100.5° Fahrenheit |
Week 4 to Week 65. The last postbaseline value for approximately 20 patients in each | |
Secondary | Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study | The immunogenicity of reslizumab was assessed by measuring for the presence of anti-reslizumab antibodies at baseline, weeks 16, 32, 48, and 52 or early withdrawal. Blood samples for anti-reslizumab antibodies assessment were also obtained from all patients (inside or outside of the US) experiencing a serious adverse event, an adverse event leading to withdrawal, or an exacerbation of asthma symptoms. | Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 52 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05398133 -
Phenotype Assessment of Blood and Airway Eosinophils in Patients With COPD and Asthma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04585997 -
Comparing Treatment Efficacy With Mepolizumab and Omalizumab in Severe Asthma - "Choosebetweenamab".
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05985694 -
AD17002 Treating Poorly Controlled, Moderate to Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03563521 -
Identifying Serum Cytokine Profiles of Distinct Inflammatory Phenotypes in Severe Asthma
|
||
Completed |
NCT03469934 -
Proof of Concept Study to Investigate Etokimab (ANB020) Activity in Adult Participants With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06388889 -
Phase III Long-Term Extension Study With Dexpramipexole
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04187976 -
Eosinophils Endotypes in Chronic Airway Inflammatory Diseases
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05813288 -
A Study to Assess the Effect of Dexpramipexole in Adolescents and Adults With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma (EXHALE-3)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01285323 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab in Patients With Eosinophilic Asthma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03696914 -
Intense Airway Eosinophilia in Asthma
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01290887 -
Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) as Treatment for Patients (12 Through 75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04228588 -
A Pragmatic Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab in Severe Uncontrolled Asthma in Brazil
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05763121 -
A Study to Assess the Effect of Dexpramipexole in Adolescents and Adults With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05748600 -
A Study to Assess the Effect of Dexpramipexole in Adolescents and Adults With Eosinophilic Asthma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01508936 -
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Asthma
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04538937 -
Prospective Registry of Eosinophilia With Respiratory Manifestations With Translational Research Identifying and Characterizing Eosinophils
|
||
Completed |
NCT05002621 -
Changes in Gene Transcription and Immunophenotypes Following Mepolizumab Treatment for Asthma
|
||
Completed |
NCT01270464 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (0.3 or 3.0 mg/kg) as Treatment for Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04674137 -
XC8 in the Treatment of Patients With the Eosinophilic Phenotype of Bronchial Asthma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04671446 -
Identification of Autoantigens in EGPA and Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
|