Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Enrolling by invitation

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03940391
Other study ID # H-1093-054-1017
Secondary ID
Status Enrolling by invitation
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2019
Est. completion date April 14, 2020

Study information

Verified date April 2020
Source Seoul National University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This single-blind prospective study is aimed to investigate the effect of antihistamine as an adjunctive sedative for the patients with histories of severe paradoxical reaction to midazolam during sedative endoscopy. Participating patients are to receive antihistamine intravenously in addition to midazolam. The primary outcome is the reduction of paradoxical reaction in the antihistamine combination group. The secondary outcome is to compare sedation quality, performance quality, reduction of total midazolam dose will be analyzed between antihistamine combination and midazolam only group.


Description:

The present study will be conducted at Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam center between May 2019 and April 2020. Participants who have histories of paradoxical reaction to sedative endoscopy in medical record gave consent on the day of the endoscopy and were assigned to receive the combination of chlorpheniramine (4-6mg) with midazolam(1-10mg) Meanwhile, the patients do not want the use of chlorpheniramine and were assigned to midazolam alone as routine clinical practice. Research medication (chlorpheniramine) was administered 2 to 3 minutes before the administration of midazolam outside of endoscopy room. The blinded endoscopist and assistant nurse are going to perform induction for moderate sedation using incremental doses of the intravenous midazolam (1-2 mg) given every 2 minutes. The endoscopists and assistant nurses will assess the occurrence of severe paradoxical reaction (Grade 3) and other major quality outcomes (procedure/intubation time, sedation quality, completeness of procedure [10 Key image documentation], the satisfaction of procedure, side effects). The endoscopists and nurses will individually rate outcome measure using a 5-point Likert scale.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Enrolling by invitation
Enrollment 220
Est. completion date April 14, 2020
Est. primary completion date April 14, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 19 Years to 69 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Previous histories of the paradoxical reaction during a sedative endoscopic examination

Exclusion Criteria:

- inability to execute informed consent

- allergic to antihistamine agent

- pregnancy

- severe cardiopulmonary disease

- prior administration of antihistamine on the same day

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Chlorpheniramine and midazolam
Administration of chlorpheniramine injection as an adjunctive sedative during sedative endoscopy.
Midazolam
Administration of midazolam as a sedative during sedative endoscopy as routine clinical practice.

Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital Seoul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Seoul National University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

References & Publications (4)

Nusrat S, Madhoun MF, Tierney WM. Use of diphenhydramine as an adjunctive sedative for colonoscopy in patients on chronic opioid therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2342. Epub 201 — View Citation

Sachar H, Pichetshote N, Nandigam K, Vaidya K, Laine L. Continued midazolam versus diphenhydramine in difficult-to-sedate patients: a randomized double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1297-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 J — View Citation

Tae CH, Kang KJ, Min BH, Ahn JH, Kim S, Lee JH, Rhee PL, Kim JJ. Paradoxical reaction to midazolam in patients undergoing endoscopy under sedation: Incidence, risk factors and the effect of flumazenil. Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Aug;46(8):710-5. doi: 10.1016/j.d — View Citation

Tu RH, Grewall P, Leung JW, Suryaprasad AG, Sheykhzadeh PI, Doan C, Garcia JC, Zhang N, Prindiville T, Mann S, Trudeau W. Diphenhydramine as an adjunct to sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Occurrence of severe paradoxical reaction (>= level 3) (1) irrational talking or increased talkativeness such as mumbling to himself/herself; (2) restlessness or loss of cooperation such as resisting the insertion of endoscope or trying to bite the scope; (3) excessive movement requiring repositioning such as jerking or swinging movements of the arms and legs or trying to draw out the scope or mouthpiece; and (4) hostile action such as trying to strike the endoscopists or attending nurses. 1 day
Secondary procedure/intubation time procedural time (time from scope insertion to scope out) Intubation time (time from scope insertion to upper esophagus) 1 day
Secondary Dose of midazolam total amount of benzodiazepine 1 day
Secondary completeness of procedure photo documentation of key anatomical area 1 day
Secondary Satisfaction for Quality of sedation 5-point Likert scale : endoscopists and assistant nurses
Strongly unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neither satisfied nor unsatisfied
Satisfied
Strongly satisfied
1 day
Secondary Satisfaction for the procedure 5-point Likert scale for pain and sedation: patients
Strongly unsatisfied
Unsatisfied
Neither satisfied nor unsatisfied
Satisfied
Strongly satisfied
1 day
Secondary adverse events hypoxia, arrythmia, low blood pressure and administration of antidote 1 day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03298776 - I-Scan a Novel Endoscopic Tool for the Macroscopic Identification of Mucosal Lesions N/A
Completed NCT02887378 - Protocol for Anatomopathologic Analysis of Biopsies Using Hot Clamps N/A
Recruiting NCT01627171 - Colonoscopy Preparation Optimization for INpatients- COIN Study Phase 4
Completed NCT02350933 - Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation N/A
Completed NCT00671177 - Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique N/A
Completed NCT06033729 - Remifentanil Target Controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During EBUS-TBNA N/A
Withdrawn NCT04983498 - Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Endoscopy Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT04719117 - Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography AI Assisted System Validation on Effectiveness and Safety
Completed NCT03369197 - Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Standard Care During Procedural Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy N/A
Completed NCT04186390 - Learning Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
Completed NCT02714699 - Oral Hyoscine Butyl Bromide Versus Diclofenac Potassium Before Office Hysteroscopy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00614159 - Ketamine Compared to Propofol for Pediatric GI Endoscopy N/A
Completed NCT04072328 - Propofol vs. Midazolam With Propofol for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients With Previous Paradoxical Reaction to Midazolam Phase 2
Completed NCT04150237 - Using Simulation to Ensure Basic Competence in Gastroscopy
Completed NCT03287687 - Safety and Efficacy of CO2 for Endoscopy Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT03351790 - Endoscopy Quality Study N/A
Completed NCT04541667 - Is End Tidal CO2 Level Elevation During Upper Endoscopy With CO2 Gas Insufflation Physiologically Significant N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06168682 - Nasal CPAP - The Treatment IMpact on Oxygenation in High-risk Patients During Deep Sedation for Endoscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05479253 - AI-assisted Endoscopy Report System In Improving Reporting Quality N/A
Recruiting NCT04903444 - Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-based Biliary Stricture Navigation System in MRCP-based ERCP N/A