Endoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Gamification of a Virtual-reality Simulation Curriculum in Endoscopy: Impact on Clinical Performance
NCT number | NCT03176251 |
Other study ID # | 17-092 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 1, 2017 |
Est. completion date | August 30, 2019 |
Verified date | January 2021 |
Source | St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Simulation-based training curricula for gastrointestinal endoscopy have been developed and have been shown to be effective. It is possible that these curricula may be further improved. Gamification, the application of game-design principles to non-game contexts, has been shown to improve learning and skill performance in medical education. In gastrointestinal endoscopy, however, no dedicated curricula have been developed using gamification principles. We aim to evaluate the impact of applying gamification to a curriculum using SBT in endoscopy on clinical performance, compared to an identical curriculum without gamification. 36 novice endoscopists from the general surgery and gastroenterology programs at the University of Toronto will be recruited. Participants will be randomized into two groups: the Conventional Training Curriculum (CTC) Group, in which participants will receive 6 hours of training on a simulator augmented with expert feedback and interlaced with 4 hours of didactic training on the theory of colonoscopy; and the Gamified Integrated Curriculum (GIC) Group, in which participants will receive the same curriculum, using the following applications of gamified learning: a leaderboard of participant performances; badges for achievement of training landmarks; and rewards for top performance. Participants will be trained to perform colonoscopies progressively moving from a low to high complexity simulators, starting with the bench-top model (1 hour) and then moving to the EndoVR® virtual reality (VR) gastroenterology simulator (5 hours). Performance will be assessed at three points: prior to training (pre-test), immediately after training (acquisition post-test) and 4-6 weeks after training (retention test). Assessment will take place on the simulator at all three time points and during two live colonoscopies at the retention test. The primary outcome measure will be the difference in clinical colonoscopy performance between the two training groups, as assessed by the Joint Advisory Group for GI Endoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (JAG/DOPS). We aim to have data collection finished by 2018. Our results have the potential to improve existing curricula for training in colonoscopy. Moreover, the development of a gamified curriculum in procedural skills may have applicability to other specialities, such as general surgery and anesthesiology.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | August 30, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | August 30, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Participants must be novice endoscopists enrolled in general surgery, adult gastroenterology and pediatric gastroenterology programs at the University of Toronto Exclusion Criteria: - Participants will be excluded if they have performed 25 or more real or simulated endoscopic procedures |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | St. Michael's Hospital | Toronto | Ontario |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Performance on a clinical colonoscopy | Difference between the control and intervention groups during two clinical colonoscopies as assessed by two independent, blinded, expert endoscopists using the Joint Advisory Group for GI Endoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (JAG/DOPS) | 4-6 weeks post-intervention | |
Secondary | Procedural Knowledge | Differences between the two groups with respect to procedural knowledge as assessed by multiple-choice questionnaires | Pre-intervention and immediate post-intervention | |
Secondary | Non-technical performance | Differences between the two groups with respect to non-technical performance during clinical colonoscopies and an integrated scenario format test 4-6 weeks after training, as assessed by the modified objective structured assessment of nontechnical skills (M-OSANTS) | 4-6 weeks post-intervention | |
Secondary | Patient comfort | Differences between the two groups with respect to patient comfort during the clinical colonoscopies, as assessed by the Nurse-Assessed Patient Comfort Score (NAPCOMS) | 4-6 weeks post-intervention | |
Secondary | Participant self-efficacy | Differences between the two groups with respect to participant self-efficacy, as measured by an adapted scale based on the General Self-Efficacy Scale | Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and 4-6 weeks post-intervention | |
Secondary | Cognitive load | Differences between the two groups with respect to cognitive load, as measured by the Cognitive Load Scale for Colonoscopy | Pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and 4-6 weeks post-intervention | |
Secondary | Technical performance | Difference between the two groups with respect to technical performance on a VR simulated colonoscopies as assessed through the JAG/DOPS | Immediate post-intervention and 4-6 weeks post-intervention | |
Secondary | Participant competitiveness | Difference between the two groups with respect to competitiveness as measured using the Revised Competitiveness Index | Pre-intervention |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03298776 -
I-Scan a Novel Endoscopic Tool for the Macroscopic Identification of Mucosal Lesions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02887378 -
Protocol for Anatomopathologic Analysis of Biopsies Using Hot Clamps
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01627171 -
Colonoscopy Preparation Optimization for INpatients- COIN Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02350933 -
Endoscopic Evaluation of the Paediatric Airway After Prior Prolonged (>24 h) Tracheal Intubation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06033729 -
Remifentanil Target Controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During EBUS-TBNA
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04983498 -
Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Endoscopy
|
Phase 4 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04719117 -
Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography AI Assisted System Validation on Effectiveness and Safety
|
||
Completed |
NCT03369197 -
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Standard Care During Procedural Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04186390 -
Learning Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT02714699 -
Oral Hyoscine Butyl Bromide Versus Diclofenac Potassium Before Office Hysteroscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00614159 -
Ketamine Compared to Propofol for Pediatric GI Endoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04072328 -
Propofol vs. Midazolam With Propofol for Sedative Endoscopy in Patients With Previous Paradoxical Reaction to Midazolam
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04150237 -
Using Simulation to Ensure Basic Competence in Gastroscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03287687 -
Safety and Efficacy of CO2 for Endoscopy
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03351790 -
Endoscopy Quality Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04541667 -
Is End Tidal CO2 Level Elevation During Upper Endoscopy With CO2 Gas Insufflation Physiologically Significant
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06168682 -
Nasal CPAP - The Treatment IMpact on Oxygenation in High-risk Patients During Deep Sedation for Endoscopy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05479253 -
AI-assisted Endoscopy Report System In Improving Reporting Quality
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04903444 -
Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-based Biliary Stricture Navigation System in MRCP-based ERCP
|
N/A |