Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Clinical Trial
Official title:
Lay Open and Curettage Versus Endoscopic (E.P.Si.T) Method in the Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease
Aim of the work To compare lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | July 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patients of both genders with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were included in our study. Exclusion Criteria: - Abscess formation 2. Immunodeficiency. 3. Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits. 4. Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. 5. Pregnant females |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Mansoura University | Mansoura | Dakahlia |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Mansoura University |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | recurrence rate | recurrence rate of pilonidal sinus symptoms after healing | one year |