Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Several studies show a significant drop in pain scores, improved fertility outcomes and amelioration of impaired sexual functioning in women following surgical resection of colorectal endometriosis. However, intermediate and long-term bowel dysfunction may occur as a consequence of radical surgery with typical symptoms such as constipation, feeling of incomplete evacuation, clustering of stools and urgency. This is described as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The primary aim of this study is the prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for full thickness excision, i.e. transanal disc excision (TADE) and nerve-vessel sparing limited segmental resection (NVSSR), regarding gastrointestinal functional outcomes using the LARS / Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) by Eypasch questionnaires.


Clinical Trial Description

Several studies show a significant drop in pain scores, improved fertility outcomes and amelioration of impaired sexual functioning in women following surgical resection of colorectal endometriosis. However, there is inceasing evidence that intermediate and long-term bowel dysfunction may occur as a consequence of radical surgery for rectal deep endometriosis (DE). Typical symptoms include constipation, feeling of incomplete evacuation, clustering of stools and urgency. This is described in the colorectal surgical literature as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The choice of operation is largely dependent on the extent of disease. Statistically significant differences in functional outcomes were found in favor of the conservative surgical approach, i.e. resection of endometriotic tissue with preservation of the luminal structure of the rectal wall thereby avoiding segmental bowel resection. In a recent retrospective multicentric cohort analysis, the incidence of LARS after either nerve and vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR) or transanal disc excision (TADE) performed for the surgical treatment of colorectal DE was assessed. All patients underwent a low rectum resection, with a resection line lower than 7cm from anal verge. In contrast to previoisly published data, no statistically significant difference between the incidence of the LARS among patients operated using TADE when compared to women treated by NVSSR were found. Interestingly, the occurence of LARS was positively associated with the use of protective ileo-or colostomy. A higher rate of severe complications was observed in the TADE group than among patients who underwent a NVSSR. Weaknesses of this study are the retrospective design and a possible bias in the TADE regarding larger DE nodules as well as the possibility of bowel dysfunction prior to surgery in women with DE. The primary aim of the present study is the prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for full thickness excision of rectal DE resulting in an anastomotic height ≤7 cm distance from the anal verge. One technique involves the preservation of the residual luminal wall integrity (disc resection) known as Rouen technique/ TADE. The other technique involves limited resection of the bowel wall with preservation of all adjacent structures (autonomic pelvic plexus, rectal vascular supply) known as NVSSR. Gastrointestinal functional outcomes of the two procedures will be compared using the LARS / GIQLI by Eypasch questionnaires. Since digestive complaints may also be present presurgically, evaluation of digestive complaints will be recorded pre- and post surgery. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04398641
Study type Observational
Source Woman and Health Private Clinic Vienna
Contact Gernot Hudelist, MD, MSc
Phone 0043 1 5333 654
Email gernot.hudelist@womanandhealth.com
Status Recruiting
Phase
Start date July 1, 2020
Completion date May 1, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04171297 - Ultrasound Evaluation of the Pelvis in Women With Suspected Endometriosis Scheduled for Laparoscopic Surgery
Withdrawn NCT03481842 - Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Vaginal Suppositories for Treatment of the Endometriosis Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03532074 - Indocyanine Green and Rectosigmoid Endometriosis N/A
Completed NCT03138954 - Endoscopic Rectal UltraSound With Elastosonography and Contrast in Deep Pelvic Endometriosis With Bowel Involvement
Completed NCT04411004 - Persistence Disease After Laparoscopic Shaving of Rectal Endometriosis
Completed NCT04338035 - Fertility in Untreated Rectosigmoid Endometriosis
Active, not recruiting NCT01291576 - Functional Outcomes of Surgical Management of Deep Endometriosis Infiltrating the Rectum N/A
Completed NCT04295343 - Three-dimensional (3D) Rectal Water Contrast Transvaginal Ultrasonography Versus Computed Colonography in the Diagnosis of Rectosigmoid Endometriosis
Active, not recruiting NCT04339946 - Bidimensional Rectal-water Contrast-transvaginal Ultrasonography (2D-RWC-TVS) Versus 3D-RWC-TVS in the Diagnosis of Rectosigmoid Endometriosis
Completed NCT04406155 - Bowel Preparation Before 3D Rectal Water Contrast Transvaginal Ultrasonography for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis
Completed NCT04296760 - Rectal Water-contrast Transvaginal Ultrasonography Versus Sonovaginography for the Diagnosis of Posterior Deep Pelvic Endometriosis
Recruiting NCT04891003 - The Identification of Optimal Ultrasonografic Tecniques for Determining the Location , Size and the Surgical Methods of Intestinal Endometriotric Nodules
Recruiting NCT05677269 - The (Cost-)Effectiveness of Surgical Excision of Colorectal Endometriosis Compared to ART Treatment Trajectory
Active, not recruiting NCT04204707 - Patient Reported Outcomes After Surgery for Rectal Endometriosis
Completed NCT04494568 - Evaluation of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in the Treatment of Rectal Endometriosis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04491305 - EHP-5 in Preoperative Assessment in Women With Endometriosis