Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

In this study, a comparison is made between two types of polyp resection methods (hand driven and motor driven morcellation). More specifically, the effects of the resection on symptoms such as abnormal uterine bleeding, and on the recurrence of polyps. The aim of the study is to find a superior method in terms of symptom relieve and polyp recurrence so this method can be used in gynaecological practice.


Clinical Trial Description

- Rationale: several techniques for hysteroscopic removal of intrauterine polyps exist today. Hysteroscopic morcellation is an effective, fast, and safe method for this. However, the differences between two different systems of hysteroscopic morcellation, motor-driven (Truclear incisor mini device) and hand-driven (Resectr 9fr) morcellation, are still unclear. The REMOvE9 study, in which women with a polyp were randomized between both techniques, is currently investigating the differences in short-term effectiveness between the two techniques. - Research question/goal: To investigate the long-term results of the effectiveness of a hysteroscopic morcellation of intrauterine polyps. The two systems are compared with each other. - Study design: This is a prospective cohort study. The patients previously participated in a randomized controlled trial (REMOvE9) and will now be contacted again for the completion of a one-time questionnaire. The study has an observational design. - Study population: Women with a history of endometrial polyp that was previously removed via hysteroscopic morcellation in the REMOvE9 study. - Primary and secondary endpoints: The primary endpoint is the risk of recurrence of abnormal uterine bleeding at post-surgery follow-up. Secondary endpoints include recurrence of other symptoms, time to recurrence, symptom relief, onset of new symptoms, onset of new polyp, satisfaction with regards to symptoms, satisfaction with regards to the treatment in general, need for additional treatments for blood loss and occurrence of pregnancy (in subfertility group). ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05337605
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]
Source University Hospital, Ghent
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date April 1, 2022
Completion date November 8, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03309709 - Endometrial Polyps Regression With Progesterone Therapy Phase 3
Completed NCT00247923 - Endometrial Polyps: Pathophysiology and Clinical Consequences N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06295510 - Observational Study of the Association Between Food Intake and Endometrial Polyps
Recruiting NCT03207126 - Pilot Study: Can Ultrasound Guided Biopsy be Used as an Alternative to Hysteroscopy? N/A
Completed NCT04706000 - Autophagy Markers in Endometrial Polyps
Completed NCT06316206 - The Use of Ethinylestradiol/Dienogest in Random Start Rapid Endometrial Preparation Phase 4
Completed NCT06316180 - The Use of Drospirenone/Estetrol in Random Start Rapid Endometrial Preparation Phase 4
Completed NCT06324851 - The Use of Drospirenone/Estetrol, Nomegestrol Acetate/Estradiol and Ethinylestradiol/Dienogest in Random Start Rapid Endometrial Preparation Phase 4
Completed NCT06316219 - The Use of Nomegestrol Acetate/Estradiol in Random Start Rapid Endometrial Preparation Phase 4
Completed NCT03790215 - Dydrogesterone in the Treatment of Endometrial Polyps Phase 4
Recruiting NCT01637974 - Efficiency of INTERCOAT (Oxiplex/AP Gel) in Preventing Intrauterine Adhesion Formation in Hysteroscopic Surgery N/A
Completed NCT05337046 - Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal System Versus Bipolar Resectoscopy for Polypectomy: Long-term Results