Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02126397
Other study ID # 230485
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received January 28, 2014
Last updated July 8, 2014
Start date May 2013
Est. completion date May 2014

Study information

Verified date July 2014
Source Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Spain: Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Hysteroscopy today is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. In recent years we have used the bipolar energy for resection of polyps by hysteroscopy, becoming a routine clinical practice and universally accepted.

Resection of endometrial polyps laser energy has recently begun to be used with satisfactory results, so studies are needed to analyze these results and compare it with the usual techniques .

This time in advance of medicine, it is appropriate to introduce minimally invasive procedures , allowing resection of endometrial polyps on an outpatient basis without anesthesia and acceptable to most patients.

These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia .

Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients


Description:

Main objective: To assess the tolerability of diode laser in the treatment of endometrial polyps using a visual analogue pain scale.

Secondary objectives:

- Determine if complete resection of polyps is achieved with both methods.

- Compare the time spent on the removal of the polyp in each of the hysteroscopic methods.

- To evaluate the safety of the laser diode with respect to the bipolar electrode (vagal syndrome, uterine perforation, infection, bleeding).

- Assess the recurrence of polyps after 3 months of resection (via hysteroscopy).

- Compare the degree of patient satisfaction with the different methods.

Design: randomized single blind clinical trial corresponds to an experimental analytical study. The patients randomly into 2 groups will include: Group A bipolar electrode treatment Versapoint and Group B diode laser treatment. Randomization was performed using a random table with 2 groups, generated in Microsoft Office Excel. The sample size needed to detect a difference in visual analog pain scale of a point with respect to the laser diode bipolar electrode is calculated; assuming a standard deviation of 1.75, a sample size of 49 patients in each group (98 would be needed in total), to a level of significance of 5% (0.05 α) with a power of 0.80 (beta 0.20). Assuming a loss of individuals from 5 to 10%


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 98
Est. completion date May 2014
Est. primary completion date March 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients previously diagnosed of endometrial polyps that can be resected. The diagnosis will be made hysteroscopically. The patient must be informed about the study, and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- the usual exclusion criteria for surgical techniques, pregnant patients, patiens under 18 patients who did not sign the informed consent

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
polyps resection with Laser Diode
resection of endometrial polyps by hysteroscopy without anesthesia
polyps resection with bipolar electrode


Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Reina Sofia University Hospital Cordoba
Spain Reina Sofía University Hospital Cordoba

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Isabel Bejerano Blázquez Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Assess the recurrence of polyps after 3 months of resection (another hysteroscopy). 3 months after resection of the polyp, repeat hysteroscopy to assess recurrence, in 10 to 15 minutes. the patient is satisfied if foretaste and whether they would recommend the procedure. Yes
Other Compare the degree of patient satisfaction with the different methods 3 months after resection of the polyp, repeat hysteroscopy to assess recurrence, in 10 to 15 minutes. the patient is satisfied if foretaste and whether they would recommend the procedure. Yes
Primary To assess the tolerability of the laser diode in the treatment of endometrial polyps using a validated visual analogue pain scale we we measure pain after resection of endometrial polyps, with 5 minutes for the patient thinks Yes
Secondary Determine if complete resection of polyps is achieved with both methods. the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes Yes
Secondary Compare the time spent on the removal of the polyp. the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes Yes
Secondary To evaluate the safety of both methods the duration of the polyp resection, subsequent assessment of the patient and her general condition. Time is measured, between 15 to 30 minutes Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05049395 - HFNO Reducing the Incidence of Hypoxia for Hysteroscopy Sedated With Propofol N/A
Completed NCT02472197 - Morcellator Versus Resectoscope in the Treatment of Uterine Polyps by Hysteroscopy N/A
Completed NCT02520414 - Symphion® System In-Office Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02590666 - Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers N/A
Completed NCT01509313 - A Trial Comparing Morcellation With Electrical Resection for Removal of Uterine Polyps Phase 3