View clinical trials related to Endodontically Treated Teeth.
Filter by:The aims of this retrospective analysis are (1) to evaluate the success rate of a non-surgical retreatment of teeth with broken file instrument into the canal using ultrasounds, microscope and a modified spinal needle, (2) to assess the outcome of the treatment if the remaining fragment was left, bypassed or removed from the root canal in terms of survival rate of the treated teeth after a 5-years follow up period.
In this observational, retro-prospective, and multicenter PMCF clinical investigation, Biodentine™, an active dentine substitute for professional dental use only, is evaluated at 10 years post-treatment, in its endodontic indications as followed: - Repair of root or furcation perforations. - Repair of root resorptions (internal and external). - Root-end filling in endodontic surgery (retrograde filling). - Apexification (tooth with open apex). - Revitalization procedure by means of revascularization. Evaluation is done through a 10-year post-treatment follow-up with collection of radiographic, clinical examination and safety data.
This randomized clinical trial compares the effects of intracanal medicaments on the incidence of postoperative pain and flare-up in asymptomatic retreatment cases.
Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different irrigation activation systems on pain after endodontic treatment in molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Post-operative pain values of the participants will be recorded and evaluated with the VAS scale. Postoperative pain values of the techniques will be compared with statistical evaluation.
Clinical performance of indirect adhesive restorations - onlays, overlays- luted with light-cured composite resin will be evaluated.
In-vitro studies do not represent the actual masticatory environment and cannot simulate the intricate chewing pattern. Hence, there is a need for an in vivo study evaluating the wear potential of the newly introduced strength - color gradient multilayered zirconia IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime (5Y-TZP/3Y-TZP) and compare it to Lithium Disilicate IPS e.max CAD which has proven to have favorable wear patterns.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess postoperative pain in prospective randomized clinical trial comparing Reciproc or hand instrument and also different obturation techniques in one visit of endodontic retreatment. Conventional root canal treatment was done to 45 patients who needed retreatment. All instruments used in this study are routinely used instrument in endodontic therapy. After completed root canal treatment, the patients asked the intense of post operative pain.
Although zirconia is widely used for fabrication of restorations, the 3Y-TZP zirconia where limited for posterior region for its high strength and bad esthetic. While the 5Y-TZP zirconia is limited for the anterior region due to its good esthetic and low strength. For that reason, the introduction of the new gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) (IPS e.max Zircad Prime) has offered a solution to solve this problem be combining the esthetic of 5Y-TZP and the high strength of 3Y-TZP. The aim of the present study is to evaluate shade matching to natural tooth and patient satisfaction of the new gradient technology zirconia (5Y-TZP\3Y-TZP) and lithium disilicate ceramic crowns.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical behavior of zirconia crowns in dental esthetic zone with vertical versus conventional preparation techniques using a new gradient technology monolithic zirconia (5Y-TZP/3Y-TZP).
The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the incidence, intensity and duration of postoperative pain following the removal of root canal obturation materials canals using rotary (ProTaper Universal or Hyflex EDM) or reciprocating file (Reciproc Blue or WaveOne Gold) systems. The null hypothesis tested was that there is no difference in postoperative pain following the retreatment procedure between the four systems used.