Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04216394 |
Other study ID # |
049.GME.2019.D |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 31, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
November 13, 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2024 |
Source |
Methodist Health System |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
While DOACs are increasing in use in the EGS patient population, the risk of bleeding and the
reversal of these agents to reduce hemorrhage is still evolving. Given the paucity of data
regarding the impact of DOACs in this patient population, it becomes empiric to identify
bleeding patterns and outcomes in the EGS population taking DOACs. We hypothesize that
patients taking a DOAC will have a higher bleeding incidence and need for an unplanned
intervention secondary to hemorrhage in EGS patients undergoing an urgent or emergent
operation when compared to patients taking warfarin and antiplatelets.
Description:
Emergency general surgery (EGS) represents illnesses of diverse pathology with
urgent/emergent treatment needs being the common denominator.A characteristic feature of EGS
is its limitation in patient preparation. It is difficult and often impossible to eliminate
certain patient dependent factors to reduce the operative risk. It has been reported that the
annual case rate in the EGS population is (1,290 per 100,000) higher than the sum of all
cancer diagnoses. The EGS burden is substantial and continues to increase. The elderly
patient population represents 48% of the overall EGS population. With the increase in the
prevalence of atherosclerotic disease in the elderly there has been an increase in the use of
antiplatelets and anticoagulants.