Emergency Abdominal Surgery Clinical Trial
— InCareOfficial title:
Intermediate Care - Effect on Mortality Following Emergency Abdominal Surgery
The objective of this trial is to evaluate postoperative intermediate care versus ward care
in patients who have undergone emergency abdominal surgery with a perioperative Acute
Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥ 10 (high risk patients).
Patients will be enrolled in the trial, if they are ready to be discharged from the recovery
unit or intensive/intermediate care unit to the surgical ward within 24 hours after surgery.
Discharge criteria will be according to the Danish national recommendation.
The intermediate care bed in the trial is defined by a certain minimum requirements to
patient observation and described treatment possibilities which have to be available to the
intermediate bed. If the treatment exceeds these treatment possibilities, the patient will
be classified as an intensive care patient. The intermediate care bed will be placed at an
intensive care unit, recovery unit or a surgical high dependency unit. If there is no
available intermediate care bed, the patients will not be randomized, but only registered as
"excluded because of no available intermediate care bed".
Hypothesis: Postoperative intermediate care for 48 hours or more will reduce the 30-day
mortality in emergency abdominal surgery patients with a high risk of postoperative organ
failure.
Interim analysis: An independent Data Monitoring and Safety Committee (DMSC) will conducted
the interim analysis based on the analysis of the primary outcome blinded for intervention
allocation. The DMSC will use P<0.001 (Haybittle-Peto) on two subsequent interim analyses as
the statistical limit to guide its recommendations regarding early termination of the trial
for benefit or harm. The first interim analysis will be conducted when the 30 days follow-up
data of about 50% (i.e., about 200 patients) of the trial participants have been obtained
and/or 75 deaths have been documented during the trial. If P<0,001 in the first interim
analysis a second interim analysis will be conducted when the 30 days follow-up data of
about 75% (i.e., about 300 patients) of the trial participants have been obtained and/or 25
deaths have been documented during the trial.
Trial terminated on the 30th November 2012. The Data Monitor Committee found a very low
overall event rate of the primary outcome at the first interim-analysis as compared to the
pre-trial estimated. This precluding any possibility to detect or reject the anticipated
relative risk reduction of 34 % as used in the sample size estimation.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 286 |
Est. completion date | December 2012 |
Est. primary completion date | November 2012 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Emergency laparotomy patients treated by general surgeons OR - Emergency laparoscopic surgery patients treated by general surgeons OR - Re-operative patients who go through emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy. AND - APACHE II score = 10 AND - Patients who are ready to be discharged to the surgical ward after postoperative stay in the recovering unit or an intermediate/intensive care bed Exclusion Criteria: - Appendectomy - Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Emergency diagnostic laparoscopy without intervention - Postoperative stay in the recovery unit or an intermediate/intensive care bed in more then 24 hours before randomization - Patients who should not be offered postoperative intensive care - Patients who have been included in the study earlier - Age < 18 years - Trauma patients Because of slower enrolment rate than anticipated the steering committee have decided on the 3rd of May 2012 to include patients with Apache II score of 10 and 11 although the originally inclusion criteria was Apache II score 12 or above. Patients with Apache II score of 10 and 11 have a high 30 day mortality as well and the potential to benefit from intermediate care. The new criteria was initiated on the 23rd of May 2012 after ethical approval was obtained. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Denmark | Aabenraa Hospital | Aabenraa | |
Denmark | Copenhagen University, Bispebjerg Hospital | Copenhagen | DK |
Denmark | Herlev University Hospital | Copenhagen | |
Denmark | Herning Regional Hospital | Herning | DK |
Denmark | Copehagen University, Hilleroed Hospital | Hilleroed | |
Denmark | Copenhagen University, Koege Hospital | Koege | |
Denmark | Sygehus Lillebaelt, Vejle Hospital | Vejle |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev | Aabenraa Hospital, AP Moeller Foundation, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Danish Council for Independent Research, Herlev Hospital, Herning Hospital, Hilleroed Hospital, Koege Sygehus, Lundbeck Foundation, Sygekassernes Helsefond, University of Copenhagen, Vejle Hospital |
Denmark,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | All cause mortality rate | Within 30 days of surgery | Yes | |
Secondary | long term mortality | Until 30 days after the last patient is enrolled in the trial | No | |
Secondary | rate of critical care unit admission from ward | Within 30 days of surgery | No | |
Secondary | Postoperative hospitalization time | until 30 days after the last patient is enrolled in the trial | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02892435 -
Prevena™ Incision Management System vs Conventional Management for Wound Healing
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03987789 -
Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Requiring Emergency Abdominal Surgery
|
N/A |