TELENeurological Support for Emergency Department

Emergencies Clinical Trial

— TELENS-ED  

Official title:

TELENeurological Evaluation and Support for the Emergency Department (TELENS-ED): an Open-label Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04611295
• Other study ID #: 942/2020/DISP/AOUMO
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 1, 2020
• Est. completion date: December 30, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: August 2022
• Source: Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Open-label, non-inferiority, teleconsultation with televisit study to compare efficacy, safety and users satisfaction of a TeleNeurological Support versus "in person" neurological examination in the emergency department

Description:

The investigtors are going to perform an interventional, open-label study on the use of teleconsultation in the emergency department focused on neurological diseases other than stroke (for which a specific protocol already exists) in two Hospitals of Modena province, Italy. The study is aimed at developing a remote neurological consultancy system (teleconsultation) for patients with acute neurological symptoms in charge of hospital facilities without 24-hour availability of neurologist consultant. Pilot project setting: a) ED of Modena Policlinico Hospital in the afternoon, night, and public holidays, time windows in which the Neurologist consultant is not present at Policlinico Hospital; b) ED of Mirandola Hospital. The project (enrolment) is expected to be developed over a period of 6 months in which 100 patients will be enrolled. The primary objective is to assess whether a TeleNeurological Evaluation and Support for the Emergency Department can guarantee a faster but qualitatively not inferior diagnostic/therapeutic work-up if compared with in person examination, assuring the availability of all the necessary examinations and treatments with a consistent time reduction. Secondary objectives: to determine if the usage of a teleconsultation physician for neurological evaluation compared to a conventional physician "de visu" in urgent but non-life-threatening neurological cases, is superior regarding 1) effect evaluation, 2) process evaluation, and 3) cost-benefit analysis. Outcome and process indicators will be assessed and compared in the following groups: - Experimental group (cases): a) patients who access the Policlinico Hospital ED in the afternoon and night-time and on holidays; b) patients who access the Mirandola Hospital ED during the period of the study. - Control Groups: a) retrospectively collected data on neurological consultation performed by OCB Neurology for Policlinico Hospital patients in the same time slots in the same months of the last two years.; b) retrospectively collected data on neurological consultation performed by Carpi Neurology for Mirandola Hospital patients in the same time slots in the same months of the last two years.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 88
• Est. completion date: December 30, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: October 30, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients aged > 18 years
• Symptoms related to possible acute / subacute neurological pathology, or worsening of known neurological pathology, for which the ED physician considers neurological consultation indicated / necessary.
• Signing of informed consent to remote neurological evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria:

• All life-threatening emergency cases, where the study procedure would interfere with clinical practice
• Patients with known neurological pathology or with clinical severity to such an extent that the need for admission to OCB/Carpi Neurology unit or to the internal wards of the Policlinico is immediately evident.
• Refusal of the patient/caregiver to perform remote neurological evaluation.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Emergencies
• Nervous System Diseases
• Neurologic Disorder

Intervention

Procedure:
• Teleneurological evaluation and support
The study is aimed at developing a remote neurological consultancy system (teleconsultation) for patients with acute neurological symptoms in charge of hospital facilities without 24-hour availability of neurologist consultant.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena	Modena
Italy	Azienda USL di Modena	Modena

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena	Azienda USL Modena

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (34)

AAN Recommendations for Expanded Coverage of Telemedicine Services. Updated on 1st July, 2020. https://www.aan.com/siteassets/home-page/tools-and-resources/practicing-neurologist--administrators/practice-top-5/aan-comments-to-cms-telemed-coverage.pdf

Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Claranau S, Kühn J, Vatankhah B, Schenkel J, Ickenstein GW, Haberl RL, Horn M; TEMPiS Group. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke. 2005 Feb;36(2):287-91. Epub 2004 Dec 29. — View Citation

Audebert HJ, Schenkel J, Heuschmann PU, Bogdahn U, Haberl RL; Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care Group. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol. 2006 Sep;5(9):742-8. — View Citation

Audebert HJ, Schultes K, Tietz V, Heuschmann PU, Bogdahn U, Haberl RL, Schenkel J; Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS). Long-term effects of specialized stroke care with telemedicine support in community hospitals on behalf of the Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS). Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):902-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.529255. Epub 2008 Nov 20. — View Citation

Belyansky I, Martin TR, Prabhu AS, Tsirline VB, Howley LD, Phillips R, Sindram D, Heniford BT, Stefanidis D. Poor resident-attending intraoperative communication may compromise patient safety. J Surg Res. 2011 Dec;171(2):386-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 May 6. — View Citation

Bove AA, Homko CJ, Santamore WP, Kashem M, Kerper M, Elliott DJ. Managing hypertension in urban underserved subjects using telemedicine--a clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2013 Apr;165(4):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Mar 6. — View Citation

Brebner JA, Brebner EM, Ruddick-Bracken H. Accident and emergency teleconsultation for primary care--a systematic review of technical feasibility, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and level of local management. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12 Suppl 1:5-8. Review. — View Citation

Chua R, Craig J, Wootton R, Patterson V. Randomised controlled trial of telemedicine for new neurological outpatient referrals. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jul;71(1):63-6. — View Citation

Cohen BH, Busis NA, Ciccarelli L. Coding in the World of COVID-19: Non-Face-to-Face Evaluation and Management Care. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020 Jun;26(3):785-798. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000874. — View Citation

Czeisler MÉ, Marynak K, Clarke KEN, Salah Z, Shakya I, Thierry JM, Ali N, McMillan H, Wiley JF, Weaver MD, Czeisler CA, Rajaratnam SMW, Howard ME. Delay or Avoidance of Medical Care Because of COVID-19-Related Concerns - United States, June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1250-1257. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4. — View Citation

Deldar K, Bahaadinbeigy K, Tara SM. Teleconsultation and Clinical Decision Making: a Systematic Review. Acta Inform Med. 2016 Jul 16;24(4):286-292. — View Citation

Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Ward MP, Richemont PC, Brazdys K, Koch TC, Miley ML, Hoffman Snyder CR, Corday DA, Meyer BC; STRokE DOC AZ TIME Investigators. Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera in Arizona: the initial mayo clinic experience trial. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1251-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574509. Epub 2010 Apr 29. — View Citation

Dorsey ER, Deuel LM, Voss TS, Finnigan K, George BP, Eason S, Miller D, Reminick JI, Appler A, Polanowicz J, Viti L, Smith S, Joseph A, Biglan KM. Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1652-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23145. — View Citation

Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):154-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1601705. Review. — View Citation

Epstein RM. Communication between primary care physicians and consultants. Arch Fam Med. 1995 May;4(5):403-9. — View Citation

George BP, Kelly AG. Rethinking Regional Neurologic Care in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1061-1062. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1956. Review. — View Citation

Handschu R, Scibor M, Willaczek B, Nückel M, Heckmann JG, Asshoff D, Belohlavek D, Erbguth F, Schwab S; STENO Project. Telemedicine in acute stroke: remote video-examination compared to simple telephone consultation. J Neurol. 2008 Nov;255(11):1792-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0066-9. Epub 2008 Dec 8. — View Citation

Hersh W, Helfand M, Wallace J, Kraemer D, Patterson P, Shapiro S, Greenlick M. A systematic review of the efficacy of telemedicine for making diagnostic and management decisions. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(4):197-209. Review. — View Citation

Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Pyle Krages K, Helfand M. Diagnosis, access and outcomes: Update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12 Suppl 2:S3-31. Review. — View Citation

Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. Covid-19 and Health Care's Digital Revolution. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):e82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005835. Epub 2020 Apr 2. — View Citation

Lange SJ, Ritchey MD, Goodman AB, Dias T, Twentyman E, Fuld J, Schieve LA, Imperatore G, Benoit SR, Kite-Powell A, Stein Z, Peacock G, Dowling NF, Briss PA, Hacker K, Gundlapalli AV, Yang Q. Potential Indirect Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Use of Emergency Departments for Acute Life-Threatening Conditions - United States, January-May 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 26;69(25):795-800. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6925e2. — View Citation

Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, Obler R, Zivin JA, Rao R, Thomas RG, Lyden PD. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Sep;7(9):787-95. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70171-6. — View Citation

Müller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches. Neurology. 2017 Jul 11;89(2):153-162. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004085. Epub 2017 Jun 14. — View Citation

Nerlich M, Balas EA, Schall T, Stieglitz SP, Filzmaier R, Asbach P, Dierks C, Lacroix A, Watanabe M, Sanders JH, Doarn CR, Merrell RC; G8 Global Health Applications Subproject 4. Teleconsultation practice guidelines: report from G8 Global Health Applications Subproject 4. Telemed J E Health. 2002 Winter;8(4):411-8. — View Citation

Piano per il miglioramento dell'accesso in Emergenza Urgenza nelle strutture sanitarie dell'Emilia-Romagna; https://bur.regione.emilia-romagna.it/dettaglio-inserzione?i=7b644492dfe2471787f041d37a19f2e8; 24.07.2019

Rasmusson KA, Hartshorn JC. A comparison of epilepsy patients in a traditional ambulatory clinic and a telemedicine clinic. Epilepsia. 2005 May;46(5):767-70. — View Citation

Sejersten M, Sillesen M, Hansen PR, Nielsen SL, Nielsen H, Trautner S, Hampton D, Wagner GS, Clemmensen P. Effect on treatment delay of prehospital teletransmission of 12-lead electrocardiogram to a cardiologist for immediate triage and direct referral of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Apr 1;101(7):941-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.11.038. Epub 2008 Jan 25. — View Citation

Skorning M, Bergrath S, Rörtgen D, Brokmann JC, Beckers SK, Protogerakis M, Brodziak T, Rossaint R. [E-health in emergency medicine - the research project Med-on-@ix]. Anaesthesist. 2009 Mar;58(3):285-92. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1502-z. German. — View Citation

Teo KC, Leung WCY, Wong YK, Liu RKC, Chan AHY, Choi OMY, Kwok WM, Leung KK, Tse MY, Cheung RTF, Tsang AC, Lau KK. Delays in Stroke Onset to Hospital Arrival Time During COVID-19. Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2228-2231. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030105. Epub 2020 May 20. — View Citation

Tso JV, Farinpour R, Chui HC, Liu CY. A Multidisciplinary Model of Dementia Care in an Underserved Retirement Community, Made Possible by Telemedicine. Front Neurol. 2016 Dec 23;7:225. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00225. eCollection 2016. — View Citation

Verhoeven F, van Gemert-Pijnen L, Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Seydel E, Steehouder M. The contribution of teleconsultation and videoconferencing to diabetes care: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2007 Dec 14;9(5):e37. Review. — View Citation

von Oertzen TJ, Macerollo A, Leone MA, Beghi E, Crean M, Oztuk S, Bassetti C, Twardzik A, Bereczki D, Di Liberto G, Helbok R, Oreja-Guevara C, Pisani A, Sauerbier A, Sellner J, Soffietti R, Zedde M, Bianchi E, Bodini B, Cavallieri F, Campiglio L, Maia LF, Priori A, Rakusa M, Taba P, Moro E, Jenkins TM; EANcore COVID-19 task force. EAN consensus statement for management of patients with neurological diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jan;28(1):7-14. doi: 10.1111/ene.14521. Epub 2020 Oct 15. Review. — View Citation

WHO. A health telematics policy in support of WHO's Health-For-All strategy for global health development: report of the WHO group consultation on health telematics, 11-16 December, Geneva, 1997. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1998.).

Ziegler V, Rashid A, Müller-Gorchs M, Kippnich U, Hiermann E, Kögerl C, Holtmann C, Siebler M, Griewing B. [Mobile computing systems in preclinical care of stroke. Results of the Stroke Angel initiative within the BMBF project PerCoMed]. Anaesthesist. 2008 Jul;57(7):677-85. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1395-x. German. — View Citation

* Note: There are 34 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Teleconsultation clinical application	Percentage of patients who undergo neurological teleconsultation over the number of patients who access on the days and in the time slots in which the service is active and needing a neurological evaluation.	6 months
Primary	Teleconsultation diagnostic efficacy	Percentage of patients re-admitted to the ED in the 7 days following the date of neurological consultation. It is expected that for the patients of the neurological teleconsultation the % of re-admission to ED will not exceed that of the patients undergone standard neurological advice.	6 months
Primary	Teleconsultation efficacy - hospitalization	Percentage of hospitalized patients among those undergone TeleNeurology compared to percentage of hospitalization for patients with in person neurological evaluation. It is expected that for patients of the teleneurology group the % of hospitalization will not exceed that of patients undergone standard neurological advice.	6 months
Primary	Time 'door to end of diagnostic process'	The total time from ED admission to the end of the diagnostic and therapeutic process (time spent in the ED): this time is expected to be significantly shorter for patients in the teleneurology group than for patients having a standard neurological advice.	6 months
Primary	Time 'door to end of neurological evaluation'	The time from the ED admission to the end of the remote neurological consultation: this time is expected to be significantly shorter for patients in the teleneurology group than for patients having a standard neurological advice	6 months
Secondary	Cost-effectiveness	Evaluation of costs, or cost-effectiveness. For the evaluation of costs, it will be developed a model that considers the cost of the system on the one hand, and the savings in terms of personnel (medical personnel, paramedics and ambulances costs). Outcome indicator.	6 months
Secondary	Evaluation of the level of satisfaction of the users	For this purpose an evaluation form will be provided to patients / family members. Users satisfaction will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) where 100 is the highest satisfaction and 0 is the lowest. Outcome indicator.	6 months
Secondary	Evaluation of the level of satisfaction of the health personnel.	For this purpose an evaluation form will be provided to medical personnel involved. Personnel satisfaction will be measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) where 100 is the highest satisfaction and 0 is the lowest. Outcome indicator.	6 months
Secondary	Teleconsultation failure	Percentage of cases assessed by teleconsultation for which the neurologist was unable to make remote decisions and requested for sending the patient to Hub Hospital for a "first-person" evaluation. Process indicator.	6 months