View clinical trials related to Elderly Patients.
Filter by:This trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase II clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab as consolidation therapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer who did not progress after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Patients aged 70-85 years with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who did not progress after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and meet the inclusion criteria will be stratified according to MRD status (positive vs negative) and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: the treatment group receiving sintilimab (for patients with a weight <60 kg: 3 mg/kg IV on Day 1 every 3 weeks; for patients with a weight ≥60 kg: 200 mg IV on Day 1 every 3 weeks) and the observation group receiving regular follow-up. Patients should receive the first dose within 42 days after completing the last radiotherapy session and continue treatment until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, loss to follow-up, death, or other circumstances where the investigator determines treatment should be discontinued, whichever occurs first. The maximum duration of sintilimab treatment is 12 months (from the start of treatment), while the observation group will be followed up every 3 months for at least one year. No other anti-tumor treatments are allowed during the study period. The study aims to compare the effects of the two treatment modalities on progression-free survival, overall survival, tumor response, toxicity reactions, and quality of life in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.
The goal of this retrospective longitudinal observational study is to compare the effects of physical and mental performance as well as quality of life in patients with neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. The main question it aims to answer is: Do very old patients benefit in a similar way from inpatient rehabilitation like younger patients? Data from about 2000 patients will be retrospectively analyzed. Functional Independence Measurement (FIM), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were recorded on admission and discharge. Researchers will compare the age group 75 to 84 and 85 to 99 to see if physical and mental performance as well as quality of life will improve.
ciprofol is a recently introduced novel sedative drug. In comparison to the traditional propofol, ciprofol exhibits a higher affinity for GABA A receptors, approximately 4-5 times that of propofol, and possesses fewer side effects, particularly notable in respiratory depression and injection pain. In the context of general anesthesia induction, recent research has confirmed a 100% success rate in the induction of general anesthesia for elderly patients (65-80 years old) undergoing non-cardiac surgery with a dosage range of 0.2mg/kg-0.4mg/kg ciprofol. However, for elderly patients aged 65 and above, even up to 85 years old, it is currently not entirely clear what dosage should be selected for patients in different age groups. Consequently, we have designed this trial with the aim of exploring the dosage requirements of ciprofol during general anesthesia induction among elderly patients in various age brackets. Methods: This is a prospective, non-controlled, non-randomized, single-blind study. Elderly patients aged 65 years and older were enrolled in the study with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing general anesthesia. All patients were divided into five groups according to age, and the corresponding initial dose of ciprofol administered was selected according to the grouping, with subsequent doses of ciprofol determined according to the Dixon up-and-down method. At least seven crossover points were obtained before the conclusion of the study.The primary outcomes were the dose of ciprofol administered at the time of loss of consciousness (mg/Kg) and the plasma concentration of ciprofol.
Introduction: Fospropofol disodium is a novel prodrug that has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with propofol. This trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of fospropofol versus propofol sedation for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients. Methods and analysis: This is a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, propofol-controlled, non-inferiority trial. A total of 256 adult patients scheduled for same-day bidirectional endoscopy under sedation will be randomly allocated, in a 1:1 ratio, to a fospropofol group or a propofol group (n=128 in each group). All patients will receive analgesic pretreatment with sufentanil 5 μg. Two minutes later, an initial bolus dose of fospropofol 6.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg propofol and supplemental doses of fospropofol 1.6 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg propofol will be titrated as needed to the target sedation levels during the procedures. The primary outcome is the success rate of same-day bidirectional endoscopy. Secondary outcomes include the time to successful induction of sedation, duration, time to being fully alert, time to patient discharge, endoscopist satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and the top-up frequency and dosage of sedative medications. The safety endpoints consist of adverse events (AEs) concerning cough reflex, gag reflexes, body movement, muscular tremor, pain on injection. Sedation-related AEs, including episodes of desaturation, severe desaturation (SpO2 < 90%), hypotension, severe hypotension (decrease in mean blood pressure ≥30% of baseline), and bradycardia, will be also recorded. Data will be analyzed on the intention-to-treat basis. Discussion: The investigators hypothesize that the efficacy and safety of fospropofol sedation for elderly patients undergoing same-visit bidirectional endoscopy will not be inferior to that of propofol. The findings will provide daily practice of sedation regimens for same-day bidirectional endoscopy in elderly patients.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of daily use of a walking platform to improve recovery of preoperative walking speed at hospital discharge following oncological surgery in patients aged 65 or older.
The aim is to evaluate the feasibility of MFI-11, one of the comprehensive frailty tests, before EBUS-TBNA. The secondary aim is to evaluate the usefulness of MFI-11 in predicting complications in risk assessment before EBUS-TBNA.
Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest morbidity and mortality among men in the world. The proportion of elderly lung cancer patients in the global lung cancer population is steadily increasing, at the same time, it is also the age group with the highest lung cancer mortality, but there is little evidence for treatment of elderly lung cancer patients. In this study, the investigators set the definition of the elderly to 65 years and older. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy were higher than those of chemotherapy alone, which established the dominant position of dual-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Studies showed that elderly patients benefit from immunotherapy. It is controversial whether elderly advanced non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) patients should receive single-drug chemotherapy or dual-drug chemotherapy. MILES-3 and MILES-4 studies show that in the advanced NSCLC elderly patients, combined with cisplatin on the basis of single drug chemotherapy can not significantly prolong OS, and can not improve the overall health status of patients. Based on the results of this study, single drug chemotherapy is still the preferred first-line regimen. Another study showed that carboplatin combined with paclitaxel had longer OS than gemcitabine or vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC with a performance status (PS) score of less than 2. In the era of immunotherapy, it is not clear whether single-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy can achieve the same therapeutic effect as dual-drug chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of single-drug chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in elderly metastatic NSCLC patients.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg Once Daily) with no specific intervention in selected elderly patients (60-80 years old) with residual inflammatory risk (hs-CRP≥ 2mg/L) and multivessel coronary artery disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Whether the intervention is effective in reducing ischemic events - Whether the intervention is effective in reducing inflammatory biomarkers' level - Whether the intervention is safe for elderly patients Participants will be randomized to receive low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg Once Daily) or no specific intervention for one year. Patients enrolled should complete one-year follow-up in the form of clinic visit or telephone call.
Remimazolam is a medication that has the advantage of a short half-life and reversibility with flumazenil. In clinical situations, the use of flumazenil for the reversal of sedation is common, but there is no precise indication for its administration. In this study, we aim to investigate the necessity of routine flumazenil use after administering remimazolam for intravenous anesthesia.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare remimazolam and etomidate in inducing quality of recovery after day surgery for laryngeal mask general anesthesia in elderly patients. The main question it aims to answer is: • The quality of postoperative recovery induced by remimazolam for laryngeal mask general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing day surgery is not inferior to that induced by etomidate Participants will be given remimazolam to induce anesthesia。 Researchers will compare etomidate to see if the quality of postoperative recovery.