Traditional In-Person Vs. Remote AR Clinical Simulation

Educational Problems Clinical Trial

— AR Brazil  

Official title:

Traditional In-Person Vs. Remote AR Clinical Simulation: A Non-Inferiority, Randomized Control Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06326450
• Other study ID #: 74626
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 1, 2024
• Est. completion date: May 31, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Stanford University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a non-inferiority, international, controlled trial that aims to evaluate the progression of physicians and residents through an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) clinical simulated scenario. The study's primary objective is to compare the performance outcomes between two groups: participants in the traditional in-person simulation and those immersed in the Augmented Reality (AR) scenario

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 20
• Est. completion date: May 31, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: May 31, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 99 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Brazilian resident

Exclusion Criteria:

• a history of severe motion sickness
• currently have nausea
• a history of seizures
• wear corrective glasses.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Educational Problems

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Augmented Reality Headset
Augmented simulation of medical crisis scenarios

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Stanford University

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Progression through the ACLS clinical simulation demonstrated by NTS and TS	Measured with Instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance. The instrument consists of 69 items, which are rated on a scale from +2 to -2. A total assessment score of performance is given based on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) at the end of the instrument.	immediately after simulation
Secondary	Demonstration of NTS during ACLS scenario	Measured with individual Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). The BARS scoring system uses four categories assessing situation awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork. The score ranges from 1 and 9 (1 = poor and 9 = excellent)	immediately after simulation
Secondary	Evaluation of the AR system's usability	Measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). The scale has 10 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree)	immediately after simulation
Secondary	Exploration of perceptions, attitudes, and opinions of the AR simulation participants	Self formulated thematic analysis using guided discussion form elaborated to explore perceptions, attitudes, and opinions using CHARM simulator. The survey has 5 items.	immediately after simulation