Face-to-Face Versus Distance Learning of Basic Suturing Skills

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The main objective of this study is to determine the acceptability and effectiveness of Distance Learning (DL) of basic suturing skills in novice learners. A prospective randomized controlled trial involving 118 pre-medical and medical students with no previous experience in suturing was conducted. Participants were randomized into two groups for learning simple interrupted suturing: F-F and DL groups (59 students in each group) . Evaluation was conducted by two independent assessors. Agreement between the assessors was calculated, and performance scores of the participants were compared between the two groups. All the participants demonstrated their ability to place three interrupted sutures, with no significant difference in the performance between the two groups. All the respondents positively rated the teaching sessions, found them useful and enjoyable. Distance learning of basic suturing is as effective as the face-to-face approach in novice learners

Clinical Trial Description

At our hospital, during the initial lock-down period in March and April 2020, all medical students' clinical clerkships were temporarily cancelled, and their educational activities switched to web-based remote learning, utilizing teleconferencing and commercially available web-based interactive clinical modules. Teaching surgical technical skills, such as basic suturing, presented itself as a more challenging component of the clinical education under these unusual circumstances as compared to teaching cognitive skills and knowledge, which raised questions and concerns around the effectiveness and acceptability of distance learning of basic surgical skills. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the effectiveness and retention of distance learning to the traditional face-to-face learning of basic (simple interrupted) suturing in novice learners. This study entails a prospective randomized trial involving two arms (traditional face-to-face versus distance learning of basic simple interrupted suturing) in pre-medical students as well as first and second year medical students at the American University of Beirut (AUB). Immediately after the teaching session as part of research, two independent surgeons assessed the students' simple interrupted suturing performance using a validated checklist and OSATS global rating. The difference in performance was used to determine the effectiveness of distance learning of basic suturing as compared to the traditional instructional method. In addition, the students in both groups were asked to complete a questionnaire (immediately after the teaching session) to investigate their satisfaction and confidence. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Educational Problems

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05275829
Study type	Observational
Source	American University of Beirut Medical Center
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	January 4, 2021
Completion date	May 19, 2021

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT06061003` - 3D Resin Printed Fracture Models for Anatomy Education	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05483335` - Assessing Burnout in Medical Students in Clerkship Years in United Arab Emirates
Completed	`NCT04027933` - Standard Patient Simulation in Nursing Students' Approach Toward Patients With Bipolar Disorder	N/A
Completed	`NCT04578821` - Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03235895` - Evaluation of Internet-Based CME for Wet-cupping Providers	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04627376` - Multimodal Program for Cancer Related Cachexia Prevention	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05026619` - Youth Outlook on Life Opportunities Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT04007679` - Pain Neuroscience Education In Students	N/A
Completed	`NCT03154372` - Deliberate Practice With Validated Metrics Improves Skills Acquisition	N/A
Completed	`NCT05208151` - Creative Drama in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Education	N/A
Completed	`NCT04042246` - Effect of Knowledge on Vaccine Take-up in Adamawa State, Northeastern Nigeria	N/A
Completed	`NCT06104813` - Evaluation of Deaf Men's Knowledge About Sexual Health
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03992235` - Importance of Exercise Educational Materials in Chest Physiotherapy	N/A
Completed	`NCT06220708` - Effects Of Dance Movement Therapy On Compassionate Flow In Nursing Students	N/A
Completed	`NCT05010213` - Plaster Patient Education With Roy Adaptation Model	N/A
Completed	`NCT05467969` - Teleteaching on Clinical Procedural Skills
Completed	`NCT04507048` - Passive Versus Active Educational Interventions for Melanoma Recognition	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT03360357` - Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Suturing Profienciency for OBGYN Residents	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03847831` - Feasibility Study of the Pilot Post-primary Active School Flag (PPASF) Program	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03577340` - Development and Validation of Performance Metrics for Cardiac Device Implant Procedures

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.