Exploring the Impact of Fully Guided Implant Placement on Classifying Bone

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Bone quality stands as a crucial determinant impacting the success rate of dental implants, exerting influence on both implant primary stability and the efficacy of osseointegration. While radiographic images can partially reveal bone quality, experienced surgeons often rely on tactile sensation during bone drilling to assess it. Subsequently, based on the diagnosed bone quality, distinct implant designs and surgical protocols have been invented to enhance survival rates. Technological advancements now enable the preoperative design of implant placement through a comprehensive guide, merging CBCT DICOM files with digital oral scanning data. This "fully guided" approach enhances the precision, stability, and safety of implant placement surgery. However, the use of a fully guided surgical guide introduces an additional factor-the friction between the drill and guide-potentially impacting the surgeon's tactile feedback. This study aims to assess the difference in bone quality evaluation by tactile sensation between freehand drilling and drilling with a fully guided surgical guide, using test blocks of different bone density. The discussion will explore the pros and cons of employing a fully guided guide to optimize outcomes in implant treatment.

Clinical Trial Description

The pilot study involves five subjects, while the main experiment will include thirty subjects. The experiment consists of two rounds, each with seven simulated bone samples. These samples include four different densities (5pcf, 5pcf, 10pcf, 10pcf, 15pcf, 15pcf, 30pcf) tested in random order. Before each round of testing, participants drill into a 50 pcf bone sample and identifying it as the hardest scale. The experiment then commences with the first round employing conventional drilling tests, followed by the second round drilling with a fully guided surgical template. After each drilling session, participants assess the hardness by recording a VAS score on a 10cm scale. The evaluation criteria utilize VAS scores as the measurement tool. The aim of this experiment is to investigate whether there are differences in the classification of bone density judged by using a fully guided surgical template compared to judgments made without using the template, under the same bone density conditions. Additionally, the study aims to determine if the use of the template affects the accuracy of bone density assessment. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT06349421
Study type	Observational
Source	National Taiwan University Hospital
Contact	lee hsuan yi
Phone	886910007711
Email	sophycoco1015@gmail.com
Status	Recruiting
Phase
Start date	April 1, 2024
Completion date	October 15, 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04083924` - Preclinical Medical Student Echocardiography Training American Society of Echocardiography Curriculum	N/A
Completed	`NCT05013476` - Tele-Ultrasound: VIrtual Hands-on Education for Novice Users	N/A
Completed	`NCT03436589` - The Indiana SNAP-Ed Long-term Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT03678077` - Trends in Cohabitation Status, Academic Achievement and Socio-economic Indicators After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Completed	`NCT05007704` - Competencies Required by Anesthesiologists Managing Critically Ill Patients
Completed	`NCT04082845` - Effect of Web-Based Training With Thyroidectomy Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT05335759` - Coaching Programme for Preceptorship of Undergraduate Nurses' Students
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04959045` - The Effect of Flipped Classroom Teaching Method on Academic Achievement and Skill Learning Level in Skills Education	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT03587233` - Are Women With Higher Professional Status More Sedentary Compared to Men?	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05086783` - Video-based Coaching (VBC) in Gynecologic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT06046378` - The Effect of Digital Stories Prepared With Digital Audio File (Podcast) on Midwifery Learning	N/A
Completed	`NCT04186390` - Learning Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy
Recruiting	`NCT02377908` - European Postgraduate Training in Geriatric Medicine	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01720017` - Impact of Manikin Training on Airtraq Avant Learning Curve in Predicted Difficult Airways	N/A
Completed	`NCT01001286` - Questscope Non-Formal Education Impact Study	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00887185` - Validation/Dissemination Of A Temporal Bone Dissection Simulator	Phase 2
Withdrawn	`NCT00425295` - Effectiveness of Human Simulation Training for Medical Crisis Management Skills	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT04343352` - Evaluation of the Efficiency of Mobile Application for Parents of Children With Epilepsy	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06091462` - Virtual Reality and Nursing Students and Dementia	N/A
Completed	`NCT05974943` - The Effect of Problem Solving and Decision Making Training Given to Nurses Managers	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Exploring the Impact of Fully Guided Implant Placement on Classifying Bone Quality Through Tactile Sensation

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms