Edentulous Jaw Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Cross-over Randomized Clinical Trial of Canine Guidance and Bilateral Balanced Occlusion in Complete Denture Wearers
Verified date | January 2021 |
Source | University of Sao Paulo |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this study is to compare the canine guidance (CG) and bilateral balanced occlusion (BBO) on denture satisfaction and kinesiographic parameters of complete denture wearers, by means of a cross-over trial. Edentulous patients will receive new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures and, after the intraoral adjustments and adaptation period, will randomly receive a sequence of occlusal schemes: BBO followed by CG, or CG followed by BBO.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 44 |
Est. completion date | June 2011 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2011 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 45 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Adult patients needing new complete dentures - Mentally receptiveness - Absence of dysfunctional disorders of the masticatory system - Normal volume and resilience of residual edentulous ridges - Absence of debilitating systemic diseases Exclusion Criteria: - Use of cardiac pacemaker - Refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Araraquara Dental School -Universidade Estadual Paulista (Sao Paulo State University) | Araraquara | SP |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Sao Paulo | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Denture Satisfaction | Assessed by a questionnaire questionnaire based on the criteria used by Celebic and Knezovic-Zlataric (A comparison of patient's satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent. 2003;21:445-451) and used by Souza et al. (Validation of the Brazilian versions of two inventories for measuring oral health-related quality of life of edentulous subjects. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e88-95.).
Eight questions were answered according to a three-point scale (0=unsatisfactory; 1=regular; 2=good), whose sum provided a summary satisfaction score that ranged from 0 (the participant is completely dissatisfied with existing dentures) to 16 (maximum satisfaction). |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.a) Maximum Mouth Opening, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.b) Maximum Mouth Opening, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (1.c) Maximum Mouth Opening, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.a) Rest Position, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.b) Rest Position, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (2.c) Rest Position, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.a) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.b) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (3.c) Mandibular Chewing Movement, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.a) Upper Denture Base Movement, Vertical Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.b) Upper Denture Base Movement, Anteroposterior Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days | |
Secondary | Kinesiographic Parameters -- (4.c) Upper Denture Base Movement, Left-right Axis | Mandibular physiologic movements and the pattern of maxillary denture movement during chewing, as recorded by a kinesiograph (K6-I Diagnostic System, Myotronics research Inc., Seatle, WA).
Specific measures involved: (1) Mouth opening; (2) Movement of the mandible from rest position to maximal occlusion (tooth clenching position); (3) Movement of the mandible during chewing; and (4) Movement of the upper denture base during chewing. Data from each measure was not combined into new variables, and collected in a single time point after each intervention. All measures were taken according to the vertical, anteroposterior and left-right axes separately. |
30 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05082038 -
Mandibular Full-arch Rehabilitation With Internal Hexagonal and Conical Connection Implants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01411683 -
Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Conventional or Mini Implants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05924451 -
Study of Hard and Soft Tissue Behavior Around Abutments on Implants.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04851002 -
Effects of Different Centrifuged Platelet Concentrates on Bone Remodelling Around Dental Implants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01230320 -
Simplified vs. Conventional Methods for Complete Denture Fabrication
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05062863 -
An Observational Clinical Study of the T3 Dental Implant System
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04354688 -
T3 Certain Tapered With DCD vs T3 Certain Tapered Non-DCD
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06152432 -
Maxillary Implant Overdentures Retained by Bars or Locator
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06209814 -
Evaluation of Open-face Maxillary Complete Denture for Patients With Prominent Premaxilla
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04662333 -
Adjunctive Benefit of Xenograft Plus a Membrane During Sinus Crestal Approach
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04237545 -
A Clinical Study of the T3 Short Dental Implant System
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04236336 -
A Clinical Study of the TSV Dental Implant System
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03674554 -
Prosthetic Complications of Screw Retained Restoration
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06155630 -
3D Printing for the Fabrication of Mandibular Implant Overdentures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04429373 -
Effect of Platelet-rich Plasm (PRF) on Two-implant Mandibular Overdenture: a Split Mouth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06146153 -
Intra Oral Scanning of Edentulous Arches
|
||
Completed |
NCT05777980 -
Effect of Prosthetic Rehabilitation on Nutritional Status of Geriatric Patients
|
||
Completed |
NCT03992300 -
Comparison of Full-arch Implant-supported Frameworks From an Intraoral Scanning or From a Conventional Impression
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03538184 -
Molecular Content of Peri-implant Sulcus During Wound Healing and Osseointegration Following Drilling and Piezosurgery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06393582 -
Accuracy Evaluation of Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study
|
N/A |