Cosmetics; Eczema Clinical Trial
— CelosiaOfficial title:
Effect of an Emollient Cream Containing 0.5% Cannabidiol and 1% Hemp Oil in the Hydration and Erythema of the Skin
Verified date | April 2020 |
Source | Avicanna Inc |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This research seeks to evaluate the short (i.e., after single application) and long-term (i.e., after periodic application) hydrating effect of a topical preparation containing CBD and hemp oil on the skin of the volar forearm as well as the effect on instrumentally measured erythema.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 49 |
Est. completion date | November 12, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | November 12, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Adult (i.e., over 18 years old) men or women. - Dry skin (i.e., Modified Kligman test >0) - Accepts and signs the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria - Pregnant or breast-feeding women - Subjects with a chronic disease that requires medication - Subjects with known diagnosis of cancer - Smoking habit or alcohol consumption habit (i.e., once a day or more) - Recreational o medicinal cannabinoid use - Skin diseases (i.e., diseases that require care of a dermatologist) - Current medication uses such as: Immunomodulators, antibiotics, corticoids or retinoids - Hypersensitivity to any component of the research product - Involvement in other clinical or cosmetic studies in the last 6 months - Recent exposure to sun causing sun tanning (i.e., as reported by the subject causing discomfort or change in the usual appearance of the skin) - Permanent decoration of the skin in the test area |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Colombia | VITA | Chia | Cundinamarca |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Avicanna Inc |
Colombia,
Bíró T, Tóth BI, Haskó G, Paus R, Pacher P. The endocannabinoid system of the skin in health and disease: novel perspectives and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2009 Aug;30(8):411-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jul 14. Review. — View Citation
Citti C, Pacchetti B, Vandelli MA, Forni F, Cannazza G. Analysis of cannabinoids in commercial hemp seed oil and decarboxylation kinetics studies of cannabidiolic acid (CBDA). J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018 Feb 5;149:532-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.044. Epub 2017 Nov 20. — View Citation
Darlenski R, Sassning S, Tsankov N, Fluhr JW. Non-invasive in vivo methods for investigation of the skin barrier physical properties. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009 Jun;72(2):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.11.013. Epub 2008 Dec 11. — View Citation
Dobrev H. Use of Cutometer to assess epidermal hydration. Skin Res Technol. 2000 Nov;6(4):239-244. — View Citation
Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Ramsay C. Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):47-52. — View Citation
Edwards C, Marks R. Evaluation of biomechanical properties of human skin. Clin Dermatol. 1995 Jul-Aug;13(4):375-80. Review. — View Citation
Fleck O, Vejrup-Hansen R, Watson A, Carr AM, Nielsen O, Holmberg C. Spd1 accumulation causes genome instability independently of ribonucleotide reductase activity but functions to protect the genome when deoxynucleotide pools are elevated. J Cell Sci. 2013 Nov 1;126(Pt 21):4985-94. doi: 10.1242/jcs.132837. Epub 2013 Aug 28. — View Citation
Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Angelova-Fischer I, Tsankov N, Basketter D. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;21(3):124-35. doi: 10.1159/000131077. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Review. — View Citation
Fluhr JW, Kuss O, Diepgen T, Lazzerini S, Pelosi A, Gloor M, Berardesca E. Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types. Br J Dermatol. 2001 Nov;145(5):696-703. — View Citation
Graham JE, Karmarkar AM, Ottenbacher KJ. Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8 Suppl):S111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.017. Epub 2012 May 8. — View Citation
Iffland K, Grotenhermen F. An Update on Safety and Side Effects of Cannabidiol: A Review of Clinical Data and Relevant Animal Studies. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2017 Jun 1;2(1):139-154. doi: 10.1089/can.2016.0034. eCollection 2017. Review. — View Citation
Jemec GB, Wulf HC. The plastic sing effect of moisturizers on human skin in vivo: a measure of moisturizing potency? Skin Res Technol. 1998 May;4(2):88-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.1998.tb00092.x. — View Citation
Kapoor S, Saraf S. Assessment of viscoelasticity and hydration effect of herbal moisturizers using bioengineering techniques. Pharmacogn Mag. 2010 Oct;6(24):298-304. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.71797. — View Citation
Kupczyk P, Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Cannabinoid system in the skin - a possible target for future therapies in dermatology. Exp Dermatol. 2009 Aug;18(8):669-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2009.00923.x. Review. — View Citation
Lodén M. The clinical benefit of moisturizers. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005 Nov;19(6):672-88; quiz 686-7. Review. — View Citation
Lukic M, Jaksic I, Krstonosic V, Cekic N, Savic S. A combined approach in characterization of an effective w/o hand cream: the influence of emollient on textural, sensorial and in vivo skin performance. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2012 Apr;34(2):140-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2494.2011.00693.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6. — View Citation
Mikulcová V, Kašpárková V, Humpolícek P, Bunková L. Formulation, Characterization and Properties of Hemp Seed Oil and Its Emulsions. Molecules. 2017 Apr 27;22(5). pii: E700. doi: 10.3390/molecules22050700. — View Citation
Nedelec B, Forget NJ, Hurtubise T, Cimino S, de Muszka F, Legault A, Liu WL, de Oliveira A, Calva V, Correa JA. Skin characteristics: normative data for elasticity, erythema, melanin, and thickness at 16 different anatomical locations. Skin Res Technol. 2016 Aug;22(3):263-75. doi: 10.1111/srt.12256. Epub 2015 Sep 1. — View Citation
Petry T, Bury D, Fautz R, Hauser M, Huber B, Markowetz A, Mishra S, Rettinger K, Schuh W, Teichert T. Review of data on the dermal penetration of mineral oils and waxes used in cosmetic applications. Toxicol Lett. 2017 Oct 5;280:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.07.899. Epub 2017 Aug 5. Review. — View Citation
Rawlings AV, Canestrari DA, Dobkowski B. Moisturizer technology versus clinical performance. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17 Suppl 1:49-56. Review. — View Citation
Reuter J, Merfort I, Schempp CM. Botanicals in dermatology: an evidence-based review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010;11(4):247-67. doi: 10.2165/11533220-000000000-00000. Review. — View Citation
Wickett RR, Damjanovic B. Quantitation of 24-Hour Moisturization by Electrical Measurements of Skin Hydration. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Sep/Oct;44(5):487-491. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000363. — View Citation
* Note: There are 22 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Evaluate the effect on hydration of a single application of the topical preparation on facial skin | 1. Evaluate the effect on hydration of a single application of the topical preparation on the skin of the volar forearm, through the direct measurement of its electrical properties as an indicator of water content at 1 and 3 hours | 1 and 3 hours | |
Primary | Evaluate the effect on Hydration of periodic application of the topical preparation on facial skin | 2. Evaluate the effect on hydration of periodic application of the topical preparation on facial skin, through the direct measurement of its electrical properties as an indicator of water content at 2 and 4 weeks. | 2 and 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Evaluate the short-term change in instrumentally assessed erythema | Evaluate the short-term change in instrumentally assessed erythema (i.e., 1 and 3 hours), through the direct measurement of skin biochromophores at the face and the volar forearm. | Up to 3 hours | |
Secondary | Evaluate the long-term change in instrumentally assessed erythema | Evaluate the long-term change in instrumentally assessed erythema (i.e., 2 and 4 weeks), through the direct measurement of skin biochromophores at the face and the volar forearm. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Evaluate the short-term effect of this topical preparation on the viscoelastic properties of the skin | Evaluate the short-term effect (i.e., 1 and 3 hours) of this topical preparation on the viscoelastic properties of the skin, through the direct measurement of its response to physical deformation by suction. | 3 hours | |
Secondary | Evaluate the long-term effect of this topical preparation on the viscoelastic properties of the skin | Evaluate the long-term effect (i.e., 2 and 4 weeks) of this topical preparation on the viscoelastic properties of the skin, through the direct measurement of its response to physical deformation by suction. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Evaluate the short-term effect of this topical preparation on the skin functional properties | Evaluate the short-term effect (i.e., 1 and 3 hours) of this topical preparation on the skin functional properties, through the measurement of trans-epidermal water loss. | 3 hours | |
Secondary | Evaluate the long-term effect of this topical preparation on the skin functional properties | Evaluate the long-term effect (i.e., 2 and 4 weeks) of this topical preparation on the skin functional properties, through the measurement of trans-epidermal water loss. | 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Evaluate the short and long-term appearance of evaluator assessed irritation | Evaluate the short and long-term appearance of evaluator assessed irritation by visual scoring (i.e., 0 hours, 1 hours and 4 weeks). Perceived skinfeel attributes of creams and lotions (appearance, rub-in, absorption, appearance of skin, immediate and delayed after-feel) have been evaluated using a trained descriptive panel. In previously published studies researchers used the skinfeel spectrum descriptive analysis method to characterize skin care products. They used strict protocols for manipulation and precisely defined terms to describe the qualitative properties and their relative intensities in each product. The evaluation process was divided into four categories: pick-up (i.e., firmness, stickiness, cohesiveness, peaking); rub-out (i.e., wetness, spreadability, thickness, absorbency); residual feel; and appearance, immediate and after 20 minutes (i.e., glossy, sticky, slippery, oily, waxy, greasy) |
4 weeks | |
Secondary | Evaluate the short and long-term emollient effect and acceptance | Evaluate the short and long-term emollient effect and acceptance of this topical preparation, through the application of a perception survey (i.e., 0 hours, 1 hours and 4 weeks). Perceived skinfeel attributes of creams and lotions (appearance, rub-in, absorption, appearance of skin, immediate and delayed after-feel) have been evaluated using a trained descriptive panel. In previously published studies researchers used the skinfeel spectrum descriptive analysis method to characterize skin care products. They used strict protocols for manipulation and precisely defined terms to describe the qualitative properties and their relative intensities in each product. The evaluation process was divided into four categories: pick-up (i.e., firmness, stickiness, cohesiveness, peaking); rub-out (i.e., wetness, spreadability, thickness, absorbency); residual feel; and appearance, immediate and after 20 minutes (i.e., glossy, sticky, slippery, oily, waxy, greasy) |
4 weeks |