Eczema Clinical Trial
Official title:
Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Topical Clobetasone Butyrate Cream in Patients With Eczema for Two Weeks to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety
| Verified date | November 2017 |
| Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
This was a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, two treatment arms, vehicle (cream base)
-controlled, parallel-group study in subjects with moderate to severe eczema (defined by
investigators global assessment (IGA) score greater than or equal to 3).
Subjects were screened within 3 days prior to randomization. At the screen visit, subjects
gave informed consent and were then assessed for health status and eligibility for inclusion
in the study. At the baseline visit, subject eligibility was assessed for randomization (Day
0). Eligible subjects were randomised to Clobetasone Butyrate 0.05% Cream group or vehicle
(cream base) group at the rate of 1:1. During the treatment phase, subjects returned to the
sites in day 7 post-baseline visit for assessment of their disease status and eligibility to
continue on the study. During the final visit, 14 days after the baseline, subjects returned
to the study sites for assessment of their disease status before completing the study. In
addition, the safety and tolerability of Clobetasone Butyrate 0.05% cream were also assessed
through the whole trial.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 240 |
| Est. completion date | February 10, 2009 |
| Est. primary completion date | January 1, 2009 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 12 Years to 65 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects with a diagnosis of eczema, fulfil the 3 follow items: 1) Erythema, papilla/water blister, Lichenification, skin damage with infiltration, 2) unknown reason, recurrent attacks; 3) itching in diseased skin - Subjects must have body surface area (BSA) disease involvement of less than or equal to 10% as assessed by palm method - Subject must present with moderate and above eczema as defined by a score greater than or equal to 3 using the investigators global assessment (IGA) of eczema severity. Exclusion Criteria: - The subject presents with any systemic disorder or active skin disease (e.g. psoriasis) that would in any way confound interpretation of the study results or subjects who present with scars, moles, tattoos, body piercings, sunburn in the test area which could interfere with the assessment of lesions at screening. - The subject has eczema restricted to the face, the feet or the hands only. - The subject is indicated any anti-infectives drug for a current complication of overt bacterial, fungal and viral infection - History of recent (<1 month) active or presence of current superficial skin infections of viral aetiology such as herpes simplex, or varicella. - The subject has been exposed to below therapy within the set timeframe: Topical agents administered in the diseased skin, including emollient - 1 week; Systemic administration of anti-histamine agents - 2 week; Systemic administration of corticosteroid -4 week; Systemic administration of immunosuppressive drugs - 4 week; UV therapy -4 week - Foreseeable intensive ultraviolet (UV) exposure during the study (solar or artificial). Subjects must not be exposed to intense direct sunlight for long periods, and must not use skin tanning devices (e.g. sunbed) for the duration of the study. - History of clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, liver, neurological, renal or haematological abnormalities. - History of allergy to components of test medications to be used in the study. - History of anaphylaxis (a sudden, potentially life-threatening systemic allergic reaction) to food, medications, insect venom, or latex. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | |
| China | GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | |
| China | GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | |
| China | GSK Investigational Site | Nanjing | Jiangsu |
| China | GSK Investigational Site | Nanjing | Jiangsu |
| China | GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | |
| China | GSK Investigational Site | Tianjin |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| GlaxoSmithKline |
China,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at Day 7 | Investigators assessed presence and severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification in four body areas using EASI: head/neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs. Investigators assigned a severity score from 0 - 3 for each area (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, and severe=3). Investigators also assigned an area score from 0 (no eruption) to 6 (>90-100% eruption) for each area. The weighting factor was 0.1 for head/neck, 0.2 for upper limbs, 0.3 for trunk, and 0.4 for lower limbs. The total body score for each body region was obtained by multiplying the sum of the severity scores of the four key signs by the area score, then multiplying the result by the constant weighted value assigned to that body region. The sum of these scores gave the EASI total, ranging from 0 to 72. A higher score represented greater disease severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Day 7 | |
| Primary | Change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at Day 14 | Investigators assessed presence and severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification in four body areas using EASI: head/neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs. Investigators assigned a severity score from 0 - 3 for each area (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, and severe=3). Investigators also assigned an area score from 0 (no eruption) to 6 (>90-100% eruption) for each area. The weighting factor was 0.1 for head/neck, 0.2 for upper limbs, 0.3 for trunk, and 0.4 for lower limbs. The total body score for each body region was obtained by multiplying the sum of the severity scores of the four key signs by the area score, then multiplying the result by the constant weighted value assigned to that body region. The sum of these scores gave the EASI total, ranging from 0 to 72. A higher score represented greater disease severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Day 14 | |
| Primary | Reduction Percentage of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score after 7 day of treatment | Investigator assessed surface & severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation & lichenification in four body areas using EASI: head/neck, upper extremities, trunk & lower extremities. Investigators assigned a severity score (0-3) for each area (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3). Investigators also assigned an area score from 0 (no eruption) to 6 (>90-100% eruption) for each area. Weighting factor was 0.1 for head/neck, 0.2 for upper extremities, 0.3 for trunk & 0.4 for lower extremities. Total body score for each body region was obtained by multiplying sum of severity scores by area score, then multiplying result by constant weighted value assigned to that body region. Sum of these scores gave EASI total, ranging from 0 to 72. Reduction percentage of score was calculated as: (sum of score after day 7 minus sum of score at baseline) *100/sum of score after day 7. Lesser negative reduction percentage lesser severity of disease, more effectiveness of treatment. | up to Day 7 | |
| Primary | Reduction Percentage of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score after 14 days of treatment | Investigator assessed surface & severity of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation & lichenification in four body areas using EASI: head/neck, upper extremities, trunk & lower extremities. Investigators assigned a severity score (0-3) for each area (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, severe=3). Investigators also assigned an area score from 0 (no eruption) to 6 (>90-100% eruption) for each area. Weighting factor was 0.1 for head/neck, 0.2 for upper extremities, 0.3 for trunk & 0.4 for lower extremities. Total body score for each body region was obtained by multiplying sum of severity scores by area score, then multiplying result by constant weighted value assigned to that body region. Sum of these scores gave EASI total, ranging from 0 to 72. Reduction percentage of score was calculated as: (sum of score after day 14 minus sum of score at baseline) *100/sum of score after day 14. Lesser negative reduction percentage lesser severity of disease, more effectiveness of treatment. | up to Day 14 | |
| Secondary | Change from baseline in Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) graded score at Day 7 and Day 14 | The IGA was used to determine disease severity in a given time and describe severity of eczema using scale of 0 to 6 as follows: 0 Clear:=No inflammatory signs of eczema; 1 Almost clear=Just perceptible erythema and just perceptible papulation/infiltration; 2 Mild:=Mild erythema and mild papulation/infiltration; 3 Moderate:=Moderate erythema, and moderate papulation/infiltration; 4 Severe= Severe erythema, and severe papulation/infiltration; 5 Very Severe=Very severe erythema, and very severe papulation/infiltration with oozing/crusting. Lesser score indicate lesser disease severity. | Baseline, Day 7 and Day 14 | |
| Secondary | Changes from baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Day 7 and Day 14 | Participants assessed the degree of their pruritus using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS; 0mm=No itch, 100mm=maximum itch) at Baseline, Day 7 and Day 14. Higher pruritus/itch VAS score indicating more severe pruritus/itching. | Baseline, Day 7 and Day 14 | |
| Secondary | Number of participants with participants-based assessment score of disease control at Day 7 and Day 14 | The participant's assessment score is a semi-quantitative score intended to reflect the participants own evaluation of disease control. It consisted of a four-point scale ranging from complete disease control (0) to uncontrolled disease (3): 0 - Complete disease control; 1 - Good disease control; 2 - Limited disease control; 3 - Uncontrolled disease. Lesser score indicate better disease control. | Day 7 and Day 14 |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT01257061 -
Effectiveness of Clemastine Fumarate + Dexamethasone Compared to Dexchlorpheniramine Maleate in Eczema Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT03563066 -
Effect of Benralizumab in Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT03089476 -
Evaluating Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Infants at High Risk of Atopy
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04818138 -
BROadband vs Narrowband photoTherapy for Eczema Trial Nested in the CACTI Cohort
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05439577 -
A Multicentre Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream in Patients With Eczema
|
||
| Completed |
NCT02916888 -
A Study Comparing the Quality of Life of Patients in the Treatment of Eczema by Pediatric Generalists and Specialists
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02075632 -
Study to Evaluate Product Duration of Use Experience With Alclometasone Dipropionate Cream
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT00143819 -
Neuroskin Forte for Dry Skin Relief in Eczema and Psoriasis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT01631617 -
Effects of Treatments on Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 2 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT04520308 -
An Open-label, Single-arm Longitudinal Study With Dupilumab for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT04358224 -
The Utility of Functionally Relevant Signature Genes in Assessing the Clinical Outcomes of Dupilumab Treatment
|
Phase 4 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03340155 -
Mechanisms of Action of Photo(Chemo)Therapy in Skin Diseases
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04023084 -
Response of Children With Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema) to Eucrisa
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT03720470 -
Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 and Dupilumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT05583019 -
Atopic Dermatitis With Accelerometry and Polysomnography (ADAP)
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03293030 -
Immunogenetic Profiling of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT02002871 -
Blue Light for Treating Eczema
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01420705 -
Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Vaccine and Atopy
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT01012453 -
A Randomised Clinical Trial in a Population of Health Care Workers With Hand Eczema
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT00375713 -
Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Xyzal® (Levocetirizine) vs Zyrtec® (Cetirizine) in Subjects With Dermatitis and Eczema
|
Phase 3 |