Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04410029 |
Other study ID # |
842526 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 29, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
March 25, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2021 |
Source |
University of Pennsylvania |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study aims to determine the effect of the Healthwise decision aid on shared decision
making in women undergoing management of early pregnancy loss.
Description:
Early pregnancy loss (EPL) or miscarriage is a common problem occurring in 15-20% of
pregnancies. EPL can safely be managed surgically, medically, or expectantly; patient
preferences, together with provider recommendations, should be used to guide treatment
decisions. The three management options differ substantially experientially for patients.
Previous literature has shown that patients have preferences for treatment and higher
satisfaction when treated according to their preferences. Decision aids provide
individualized information to help patients clarify their priorities and personal values.
There is good evidence that decision aids compared to usual care resulted in greater
knowledge, more realistic expectations, lower decisional conflict relating to feeling
informed, more active decision making, less people remaining undecided, and greater effect
agreement on value and choice. Despite this, there is limited research on the extent of
decisional conflict experienced by women undergoing treatment for EPL, or the effect of
decision aids on decisional conflict. Furthermore, only a few decision aid tools are publicly
available for this indication. The Healthwise decision aid tool receives high scores by the
International Patient Decision Aid Standards Scale, and is readily available to patients
within the clinical site's electronic medical record.
The investigators propose a pilot randomized control trial, enrolling 50 participants with
EPL. The study will measure baseline decisional conflict, and randomize participants to
counseling with or without the decision aid. The investigators intend to study the Decisional
Conflict Scale at baseline and after counseling, knowledge scores, Decision Regret and the
9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q9) after counseling. Study data can be used
to inform future research and to identify patients with predictors for high decisional
conflict. This study is the first step towards validation of a high-quality decision aid tool
for patients undergoing EPL management. It will also be the first study to report on
decisional conflict and regret in patients with early pregnancy loss.