Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Dyslexia.

Dyslexia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Dyslexia: a Randomized Double-blind Study.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04244578
• Other study ID #: 201201X002931
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 1, 2016
• Est. completion date: February 1, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: July 2021
• Source: Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The present study grounds on the absence of evidence-based treatment in individuals with dyslexia. At this topic, the present study will explore the potential effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over parieto-occipital brain regions, cerebral areas usually disrupted in individuals with dyslexia. tDCS will be administered without concomitantly training. Therefore, the investigators hypothesized that active tDCS over parieto-occipital areas will enhance reading skills in children and adolescents with dyslexia. On the contrary, sham tDCS (placebo) over parieto-occipital areas will not have significant effect on reading. Further, both active and sham tDCS will be safe and well-tolerated.

Description:

The study design is randomized stratified, cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled. Children and adolescents with dyslexia will be selected and randomly assigned to two different groups: 1. Active tDCS over parieto-occipital areas + sham tDCS over parieto-occipital areas (Active-Sham tDCS); 2. Sham tDCS over parieto-occipital areas + active tDCS over parieto-occipital areas (Sham-Active tDCS). In this project, the investigators will work to understand whether a brain-based intervention, with the use of tDCS without combined training, can enhance reading in individuals with dyslexia. The protocol will allow the investigators to: 1. Testing the efficacy of stand-alone tDCS in enhancing reading in individuals with dyslexia; 2. Testing the critical role of brain regions (parieto-occipital areas) usually involved in reading and disrupted in dyslexia; 3. Predicting outcomes based on reading-related skills; 4. Investigating the safety and tolerability of tDCS; The overarching goal is to provide a scientific foundation for devising new rehabilitation strategies in dyslexia.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 28
• Est. completion date: February 1, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: September 1, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 9 Years to 18 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Children and adolescents with dyslexia (DSM-5, APA 2013)
• IQ = 85

Exclusion Criteria:

• Having a comorbidity with an important medical conditions;
• Having neurological diseases;
• Having Epilepsy o family history of epilepsy;
• Receiving a treatment for dyslexia in the previous three months before the baseline screening;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Dyslexia

Intervention

Device:
• Active tDCS
Active tDCS will be delivered to parieto-occipital areas for five consecutive days. tDCS will be delivered by a battery driven, direct current stimulator through a pair of saline-soaked sponge electrodes kept firm by elastic bands. The electrodes will be placed on the left (anodal) and right (cathodal) parieto-occipital areas, PO7 and PO8 position according to the 10-20 international EEG system for electrode placement. Stimulation intensity will be set at 1 milliampere (mA), the duration of stimulation will be 20 min.
• Sham tDCS
Sham tDCS will be delivered to parieto-occipital areas for five consecutive days. tDCS will be delivered by a battery driven, direct current stimulator through a pair of saline-soaked sponge electrodes kept firm by elastic bands. The electrodes will be placed on the left (anodal) and right (cathodal) parieto-occipital areas, PO7 and PO8 position according to the 10-20 international EEG system for electrode placement. Stimulation intensity will be set at 1 milliampere (mA), but the current will be applied for 30 s and will be ramped down without the participants awareness.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute	Roma

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

References & Publications (41)

Achenbach, T.M., & Rescorla, L.A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1229-36. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576785. Epub 2010 Apr 15. — View Citation

Bakker DJ. Treatment of developmental dyslexia: a review. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Jan-Mar;9(1):3-13. Review. — View Citation

Barca L, Burani C, Arduino LS. Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Aug;34(3):424-34. — View Citation

Belacchi, C., Scalisi, T.G., Cannoni, E. e Cornoldi, C. (2008). Matrici Progressive di Raven Forma Colore (CPM-47). Manuale d'uso e standardizzazione italiana. Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali.

Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011 Sep;14(8):1133-45. doi: 10.1017/S — View Citation

Calvino, I. (1966). Marcovaldo ovvero le stagioni in città. Torino: Einaudi.

Cattaneo Z, Pisoni A, Papagno C. Transcranial direct current stimulation over Broca's region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience. 2011 Jun 2;183:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.058. Epub 2011 Apr 6. — View Citation

Consensus Conference, Disturbi Specifici dell'apprendimento, ISS, 2011.

Cornoldi C. e Colpo G. (1998), Prove di Lettura MT per la Scuola Elementare-2, Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali.

Costanzo F, Menghini D, Caltagirone C, Oliveri M, Vicari S. High frequency rTMS over the left parietal lobule increases non-word reading accuracy. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Jul 20. — View Citation

Costanzo F, Menghini D, Caltagirone C, Oliveri M, Vicari S. How to improve reading skills in dyslexics: the effect of high frequency rTMS. Neuropsychologia. 2013 Dec;51(14):2953-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Oct 31. — View Citation

Croarkin PE, Wall CA, Lee J. Applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in child and adolescent psychiatry. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;23(5):445-53. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2011.623688. Review. — View Citation

Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Marceglia S, Cogiamanian F, Barbieri S, Scarpini E, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008 Aug 12;71(7):493-8. doi: 10. — View Citation

Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, Marcolin MA, Rigonatti SP, Silva MT, Paulus W, Pascual-Leone A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):23 — View Citation

Hoeft F, Hernandez A, McMillon G, Taylor-Hill H, Martindale JL, Meyler A, Keller TA, Siok WT, Deutsch GK, Just MA, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Gabrieli JD. Neural basis of dyslexia: a comparison between dyslexic and nondyslexic children equated for reading abil — View Citation

Hoeft F, McCandliss BD, Black JM, Gantman A, Zakerani N, Hulme C, Lyytinen H, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Glover GH, Reiss AL, Gabrieli JD. Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 4;108(1):361-6. doi: 10.1073/ — View Citation

Holt RL, Mikati MA. Care for child development: basic science rationale and effects of interventions. Pediatr Neurol. 2011 Apr;44(4):239-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.11.009. Review. — View Citation

Jackson SR, Parkinson A, Manfredi V, Millon G, Hollis C, Jackson GM. Motor excitability is reduced prior to voluntary movements in children and adolescents with Tourette syndrome. J Neuropsychol. 2013 Mar;7(1):29-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-6653.2012.02033.x. — View Citation

Jäncke L, Cheetham M, Baumgartner T. Virtual reality and the role of the prefrontal cortex in adults and children. Front Neurosci. 2009 May 1;3(1):52-9. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.006.2009. eCollection 2009 May. — View Citation

Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN, Frackowiak RS. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):495-504. — View Citation

Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Nair D, Schlaug G. Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology. 2010 Dec 14;75(24):2176-84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202013a. Epub 2010 Nov 10. — View Citation

Mattai A, Miller R, Weisinger B, Greenstein D, Bakalar J, Tossell J, David C, Wassermann EM, Rapoport J, Gogtay N. Tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Brain Stimul. 2011 Oct;4(4):275-80. doi: 10.1016/j — View Citation

Miniussi C, Rossini PM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):579-601. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.562689. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Review. — View Citation

Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Zago S, Priori A. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;79(4):451-3. Epub 2007 Dec 20. — View Citation

Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, Tergau F. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 May 15;15(4):619-26. — View Citation

Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007 May 30;72(4-6):208-14. Epub 2007 Jan 24. — View Citation

Quintana H. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in persons younger than the age of 18. J ECT. 2005 Jun;21(2):88-95. Review. — View Citation

Rubio-Morell B, Rotenberg A, Hernández-Expósito S, Pascual-Leone Á. [The use of noninvasive brain stimulation in childhood psychiatric disorders: new diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities and challenges]. Rev Neurol. 2011 Aug 16;53(4):209-25. Review. S — View Citation

Sartori G., Job R. e Tressoldi P.E. (2007), DDE-2. Batteria per la valutazione della dislessia e della disortografia evolutiva, Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali.

Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A. From Singing to Speaking: Why Singing May Lead to Recovery of Expressive Language Function in Patients with Broca's Aphasia. Music Percept. 2008 Apr 1;25(4):315-323. — View Citation

Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1571-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.12.1571. Review. — View Citation

Schneider HD, Hopp JP. The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):640-54. doi: 10.3109/02 — View Citation

Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Mencl WE, Fulbright RK, Skudlarski P, Constable RT, Marchione KE, Fletcher JM, Lyon GR, Gore JC. Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jul 15;52( — View Citation

Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA, Pugh KR, Fulbright RK, Constable RT, Mencl WE, Shankweiler DP, Liberman AM, Skudlarski P, Fletcher JM, Katz L, Marchione KE, Lacadie C, Gatenby C, Gore JC. Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dys — View Citation

Simos PG, Fletcher JM, Bergman E, Breier JI, Foorman BR, Castillo EM, Davis RN, Fitzgerald M, Papanicolaou AC. Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology. 2002 Apr 23;58(8):1203-13. — View Citation

Sokhadze EM, Baruth JM, Sears L, Sokhadze GE, El-Baz AS, Casanova MF. Prefrontal neuromodulation using rTMS improves error monitoring and correction function in autism. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012 Jun;37(2):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s10484-012-9182-5. — View Citation

Stuss DT. The future of cognitive neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):755-68. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.605590. Epub 2011 Sep 27. Review. — View Citation

Temple E, Deutsch GK, Poldrack RA, Miller SL, Tallal P, Merzenich MM, Gabrieli JD. Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2860-5. Epub 2003 — View Citation

Tressoldi P.E. L'evoluzione della lettura e scrittura dalla 2 elementare alla 3 media. Dati per un modello di sviluppo e per la diagnosi di disturbo specifico.Età Evolutiva, 53 - pp. 43-55, 1996

Vines BW, Norton AC, Schlaug G. Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of melodic intonation therapy. Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 26;2:230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00230. eCollection 2011. — View Citation

* Note: There are 41 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Non-word reading speed	The proportion of patients with change of at least 0.06 sill/sec in the non-word reading speed following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Non-word reading accuracy	The proportion of patients with change in the non-word reading accuracy following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Word reading speed	The proportion of patients with change in the word reading speed following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Word reading accuracy	The proportion of patients with change in the word reading accuracy following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Text reading speed	The proportion of patients with change in the text reading speed following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Text reading accuracy	The proportion of patients with change in the text reading accuracy following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Verbal and visuo-spatial n-back	The proportion of patients with change in the index of verbal and visuo-spatial working memory (more score means better outcome) following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Phoneme Blending	The proportion of patients with change in the index of phoneme blending (more score means better outcome) following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Rapid Automatized Naming of color and letters	The proportion of patients with change in the accuracy and speed of Rapid Automatized Naming of color and letters following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Lexical Decision	The proportion of patients with change in the accuracy and speed of Lexical decision following Active tDCS sessions than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention
Secondary	Questionnaire of safety and tolerability (Questionnaire of adverse effect)	The proportion of patients with change in the questionnaire of safety and tolerability (Questionnaire of adverse effect; Brunoni et al., 2011) following Active tDCS sessions will be the same than after Sham tDCS sessions both in ActiveSham tDCS and ShamActive tDCS.	up to one month after the end of the intervention