View clinical trials related to Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding.
Filter by:Isthmocele is a growing concern as a cause of abnormal uterine bleeding, especially post menstrual bleeding which may be present in up to 82% of these cases (Iannone et al 2019). our trial is a randomized clinical trial in which women will be randomly allocated to either medical treatment by oral contraceptive or to medical treatment by misotac.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized, single blind, controlled intervention trial to observe the therapeutic effect of kidney-tonifying and tune up Chong-Ren hemostasis Chinese medicine periodic therapy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding based on objective Chinese and western medicine evaluation standard.
The comparator drug (Zoladex 3.6 mg) is approved for use as a thinning agent for the endometrium prior to endometrial ablation. The dosing recommendation is one or two depots with each depot given four weeks apart. When two depots are administered, surgery should be performed within two to four weeks following administration of the second depot.
In this study, the investigators will compare the frequency and amount of bleeding after tubal sterilization and salpingectomy
Heavy periods is a significant problem in reproductive age .It affects about a third of women in the childbearing period Any of the following is considered to be heavy menstrual bleeding (Bleeding that lasts more than 7 days,Bleeding that soaks through one or more tampons or pads every hour for several hours in a row.Needing to wear more than one pad at a time to control menstrual flow.,Needing to change pads or tampons during the night or Menstrual flow with blood clots that are as big as a quarter or larger) . Heavy periods can be caused by organic cause as fibroids, adenomyosis, polyps or they can be dysfunctional.Dysfunctional uterine bleeding is irregular uterine bleeding that occurs in the absence of recognisable pelvic pathology, general medical disease, or pregnancy. It reflects a disruption in the normal cyclic pattern of ovulatory hormonal stimulation to the endometrial lining. Several treatment options include: hormonal treatment as norethisterone acetate,oral contraceptive pills, gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue. ,tranexamic acid or non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The investigators plan to do a comparative study between norethisterone acetate and tranexamic acid regarding their control of the heavy periods as well as their effect on the uterine and endometrial vasculature.
Research hypothesis: Release of levonorgestrel from Metraplant-E levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine contraceptive device is inadequate to be used as a medical line of treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The investigators aim to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the intrauterine system (Metraplant-E) in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
The objectives of the present study is to determine the effectiveness of cyclic desogestrel (DSG) compared with cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate for the treatment of anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in the following aspects: 1. Endometrial histopathology changes 2. Menstrual cycle control.
In this study, the investigators would like to see if giving medroxyprogesterone acetate for 3 weeks after Leuprolide acetate injection will help to decrease this amount of bleeding, decrease the amount of nausea, bloating and cramping and increase patient satisfaction
The study compares the effect of bilateral salpingectomy associated with conservative hysterectomy on ovarian function to the standard hysterectomy with conservation of both ovaries and tubes in terms of hormone assays, ovarian ultrasound evaluation, complications, quality of life.
Approximately 600,000 women undergo hysterectomy each year in the United States, of which 12% are laparoscopic. The most common indications for hysterectomy are: symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (40.7%), endometriosis (17.7%), and prolapse (14.5%). The first total laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed by Reich et al in 1988. Many studies have proven that laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with lower preoperative morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and shorter recovery times than abdominal hysterectomy. The literature has also shown the complication rates for laparoscopic cases are similar to open procedures in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice state that laparoscopic hysterectomy is an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. The ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice site multiple advantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy to abdominal hysterectomy including faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and fewer abdominal wall/wound infections. Despite the recommendations of ACOG for a more minimally invasive approach, 66% of all hysterectomies are performed abdominally. Key reasons for the lag in utilization of laparoscopic techniques are the technical obstacles of performing minimally invasive hysterectomies. Robotic technology has emerged as a means to decrease the learning curve and increase the availability of minimally invasive surgery to patients. A current review of the literature reveals no randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The investigator's aim is to address this void. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy is equivalent to Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with respect to operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay. The investigator's secondary objective was to assess the cost, morbidity, and mortality of each procedure.