Dupuytren Disease of Finger Clinical Trial
— EFAPADOfficial title:
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy for Dupuytren's Disease: a Multicenter, Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial, With Surgery as Comparator
The main objective is to investigate if percutaneous needle aponeurotomy is non-inferior to open surgery using aponeurectomy in treatment of flexion contracture due to Dupuytren's disease. Our hypothesis is that percutaneous needle aponeurotomy has suitable efficacy and safety profile for large application in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease and that it is consequently able to drastically reduce the need of open surgery in this indication.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 120 |
Est. completion date | December 14, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | March 14, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age = 18 years old - Ascertained Dupuytren disease: palpable fibrotic nodule or cord developed from the palmar aponeurosis, flexion contracture of a metacarpophalangeal or proximal interphalangeal joint. - Presence of at least one flexion contracture of a metacarpophalangeal joint of the hand due to Dupuytren's disease and > or = 20° - Written informed consent signed by the patient - Patient affiliated to the social security Exclusion Criteria: - Presence of other musculoskeletal disorders of the hand than Dupuytren's disease: known inflammatory rheumatic disease of the hand, clinical signs of inflammatory rheumatic disease of the hand, MP or PIP pain at inclusion visit. - Previous surgery of the hand to be treated resulting in functional limitation or limitation of finger mobility - Any other pathological condition or limited range of motion in the finger to be treated - Psychiatric status precluding patient evaluation; vulnerable persons; adults under legal protection order or incompetent, physically or mentally incapable of giving his consent. - Pregnant or beastfeeding women - Participation in another interventional trial |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Centre d'Imagerie Médicale Bachaumont Paris Centre | Paris | |
France | Hopital LARIBOISIERE - Radiologie | Paris | |
France | Hopital LARIBOISIERE - Rhumatologie | Paris | |
France | JOUVENET - Orthopédie, chirurgie de la main et du membre supérieur | Paris |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension | Expressed in degrees, using low energy computed tomography for blinded assessment (computed tomography imaging will be analysed by a blinded assessor not involved in the treatment). Baseline will be Metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension the day of the treatment, before any treatment | at 3 months after treatment | |
Secondary | Metacarpophalangeal joint contractures during passive and active extension | Expressed in degrees using clinical goniometry, and patient wearing white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. | at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | Main metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension, | Expressed in degrees, using low energy computed tomography, for blinded assessment (computed tomography imaging will be analysed by a blinded assessor not involved in the treatment). | at 36 months after treament | |
Secondary | The clinical success | The clinical success is defined as the reduction of flexum to within 0 to 5° during passive extension, using clinical goniometry, for the main metacarpophalangeal joint); Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. | at 3 months after treament | |
Secondary | The recurrence | The recurrence is defined as the flexum progression of 20°, during passive extension, using clinical goniometry, after clinical success. Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. | at 12, 24 and 36 months after treament | |
Secondary | The interphalangeal joint contractures during passive and active extension | Expressed in degrees, using clinical goniometry. Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. | at 1 week, 1, 3,12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | The 70% improvement from baseline of the flexion contracture | The flexion contracture of each treated joint, during passive extension will be assessed by a blinded assessor (Patient will wear white opac gloves). - Flexion contracture in degrees using goniometry reported as follows: ray Number; metacarpophalangeal angle; interphalangeal angle | at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | The active range of motion of metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal treated joints | The active range of motion of metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal treated joints will be assessed by a blinded assessor (Patient will wear white opac gloves). | at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | The functional limitation using Quick DASH questionnaire | The patient will fill out the auto-questionnaire. The blinded assessor will calculate the score (0 to 100, with highest value indicating highest disability). | at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | The URAM scale | The patient will fill out the auto-questionnaire. The blinded assessor will calculate the score (0 to 45, with highest value indicating highest disability). | at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | The patient satisfaction on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale | The assessor will ask the patient the following question: "How would you rate satisfaction about the treatment you underwent in the study?" Patients will be asked to mark the level of their satisfaction on a l00-mm, nonhatched VAS scale marked at one end as "not satisfied" and at the other as "completely satisfied'' | at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | The number of secondary and repeated treatments | The number of secondary or repeated open surgeries and percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be recorded by the unblinded assessor. | at 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment | |
Secondary | Complications and adverse events for primary treatment | The number and the types of complications and adverse events for primary open surgery and first line percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be collected by an unblinded assessor. | at the treatment time, and at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months; | |
Secondary | Complications and adverse events for secondary treatment | The number and the types of complications and adverse events for secondary open surgery and percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be collected by an unblinded assessor. | at the treatment time, at 12, 24 and 36 months; | |
Secondary | The post-interventional pain and needs | The post-interventional pain and needs of nursing, splinting, medication, physiotherapy,sick leave, time return to regular activities using a patient diary. These datas will be collected by the unblinded assessor. | at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04122313 -
Post-contracture Release Radiation for Dupuytren's Disease
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03406338 -
Fasciectomy vs Collagenase Injection in Recurrent Dupuytren Disease
|
Phase 4 |