Point of Care Test of LTA Level in Tear Fluid, Measured With a POCT Test, in DE Patients Following IPL Treatment

Dry Eye Clinical Trial

Official title:

Point of Care Test of LTA Level in Tear Fluid, Measured With a POCT Test, in DE Patients Following IPL Treatment

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06269237
• Other study ID #: 2023LTA
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 22, 2024
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: May 2023
• Source: He Eye Hospital
• Contact: Guanghao Qin
• Phone: +8618842664420
• Email: qinguanghao[@]hsyk.com.cn
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To quantify and compare tear levels of Intense pulsed light (IPL) and traditional dry eye clinical tests in dry eye patients before and after Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment.

Description:

Dry eye is multifactorial, mainly manifested as eye pain, visual impairment (blurred and blurry vision), tear film instability, and tear film hypertonicity, which can cause ocular surface damage. Some possible causes of DED include aging, menopause, Meibomian gland dysfunction (Meibomian gland dysfunction; MGD), Sjogren's syndrome, conjunctival fibrotic disease, refractive surgery, and systemic or topical drugs. Insufficient tear secretion or excessive tear evaporation has been demonstrated to cause precorneal tear concentration or hypertonicity, which disrupts tear film homeostasis. Tear film hypertonicity can cause cell morphological changes, inflammatory cascades, cell death, tear film instability, and further lead to tear hypertonicity. Mgd-induced Evaporative dry eye; EDE) is the most common form of dry eye]. Anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, hot compress, eyelid cleaning and meibomian gland expression are the treatment standards for MGD. However, its long-term efficacy is not satisfactory due to poor patient compliance. MGD has been found to be associated with eyelid inflammatory disorders. Rosacea affects 5.46% of adults (range 0.09-24.1%) of whom 58% have MGD. Ocular symptoms precede cutaneous rosacea in 15 to 10% of cases, indicating the presence of subclinical variation. Intense pulsed light (IPL) has mostly been utilized as a dermatological treatment for conditions like facial rosacea, facial erythema, acne, and seborrheic keratosis throughout the last few decades. In 2015, researchers reported the use of IPL for treating MGD to improve the signs and symptoms of DED. Two years later, the TFOS DEWS II report listed IPL as an option for treating DED. Mechanisms of IPL action include liquefication of meibum, regulate inflammation, destroy abnormal blood vessels, inhibit metalloproteinases, and photo modulation. Past studies have reported that IPL treatment modulates tear inflammatory cytokines, with improvements in tear inflammation prior to changes in dry eye signs, however, these studies have been limited by laboratory tests. It is difficult to apply in clinical practice. Lymphotoxin-alpha (LTA) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily and is expressed by a variety of cells, including T cells, B cells and natural killer cells. LTA secreted to the extracellular space assembles into a homotrimer (LTα3) as a soluble protein, and binds to the tumor necrosis factor receptor to play a role. LTA has been shown to be a diagnostic biomarker for dry eye in past studies. The aim of this study is to investigate the therapeutic mechanism of IPL and provide evidence for the treatment of dry eye by using a point-of-care LTA detection reagent to quantitatively compare the tear LTA levels before and after IPL treatment with traditional dry eye clinical parameters.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: July 1, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: June 1, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 90 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• age = 18 years
• Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV
• capable and willing to comply with the treatment and follow-up obligations
• a determination of DED based on (a) the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) =13 score represents severe DED, (b) non-invasive tear film breakup time (NITBUT) of =5 sec, or conjunctivocorneal staining score (CS) =3 points according to the Japanese Dry Eye Consensus

Exclusion Criteria:

• Existing ocular trauma, infectious diseases, recent surgical history
• Skin defects, pigmentation, moles, scars in the treatment area, skin cancer
• Autoimmune diseases, skin allergies.
• Pregnancy or lactation
• Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Dry Eye
• Dry Eye Syndromes

Intervention

Device:
• M22
Participants in the group with 3 sessions of IPL, 2 weeks apart. Device: Intense pulsed light IPL treatment intensity was chosen based on the Fitzpatrick scale as follows: Fitzpatrick scale I, II, III, 10-15 J/cm2 with a 570-nm filter. Other Names: • IPL
• sham M22
Participants in the group with 2 sessions of IPL, 1 session of sham IPL, 2 weeks apart. Device: Intense pulsed light IPL treatment intensity was chosen based on the Fitzpatrick scale as follows: Fitzpatrick scale I, II, III, 10-15 J/cm2 with a 570-nm filter.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
He Eye Hospital

References & Publications (29)

Arita R, Itoh K, Inoue K, Amano S. Noncontact infrared meibography to document age-related changes of the meibomian glands in a normal population. Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):911-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.031. — View Citation

Askeroglu U, Alleyne B, Guyuron B. Pharmaceutical and herbal products that may contribute to dry eyes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan;131(1):159-167. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318272a00e. — View Citation

Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, Bonini S, Gabison EE, Jain S, Knop E, Markoulli M, Ogawa Y, Perez V, Uchino Y, Yokoi N, Zoukhri D, Sullivan DA. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):438-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Erratum In: Ocul Surf. 2019 Oct;17(4):842. — View Citation

Chen H, Chen H, Liang L, Zhong Y, Liang Y, Yu Y, Huang S, Lu X. Evaluation of Tear Protein Markers in Dry Eye Disease with Different Lymphotoxin-Alpha Expression Levels. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;217:198-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.013. Epub 2020 Mar 21. — View Citation

Chen X, Graham J, Dabbah MA, Petropoulos IN, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. An Automatic Tool for Quantification of Nerve Fibers in Corneal Confocal Microscopy Images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017 Apr;64(4):786-794. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2573642. Epub 2016 Jun 7. — View Citation

Dell SJ, Gaster RN, Barbarino SC, Cunningham DN. Prospective evaluation of intense pulsed light and meibomian gland expression efficacy on relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 May 2;11:817-827. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S130706. eCollection 2017. — View Citation

Evans V, Millar TJ, Eden JA, Willcox MD. Menopause, hormone replacement therapy and tear function. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506(Pt B):1029-33. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_145. No abstract available. — View Citation

Fraunfelder FT, Sciubba JJ, Mathers WD. The role of medications in causing dry eye. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:285851. doi: 10.1155/2012/285851. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Erratum In: J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 4;2019:2989680. — View Citation

Kang YS, Lee HS, Li Y, Choi W, Yoon KC. Manifestation of meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Sjogren's syndrome, non-Sjogren's dry eye, and non-dry eye controls. Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;38(3):1161-1167. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0577-4. Epub 2017 May 31. — View Citation

Li Q, Liu J, Liu C, Piao J, Yang W, An N, Zhu J. Effects of intense pulsed light treatment on tear cytokines and clinical outcomes in meibomian gland dysfunction. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0256533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256533. eCollection 2021. — View Citation

Liu J, Liu L, Zhou L, Chen L, Chen X, Xiong X, Deng Y. The Effect of Intense Pulsed Light on the Skin Microbiota and Epidermal Barrier in Patients with Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris. Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Dec;53(10):1348-1355. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23426. Epub 2021 Jul 5. — View Citation

Liu R, Rong B, Tu P, Tang Y, Song W, Toyos R, Toyos M, Yan X. Analysis of Cytokine Levels in Tears and Clinical Correlations After Intense Pulsed Light Treating Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;183:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Sep 6. — View Citation

Ma J, Li C, Zhao Y, Shen Z, Hu B, Peng R, Hong J. Ophthalmic manifestations are associated with reduced tear lymphotoxin-alpha levels in chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02251-y. — View Citation

Machalinska A, Zakrzewska A, Markowska A, Safranow K, Wiszniewska B, Parafiniuk M, Machalinski B. Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Rosacea Patients. Curr Eye Res. 2016 Aug;41(8):1029-1034. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1088953. Epub 2015 Dec 7. — View Citation

Rong B, Tang Y, Liu R, Tu P, Qiao J, Song W, Yan X. Long-Term Effects of Intense Pulsed Light Combined with Meibomian Gland Expression in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Oct;36(10):562-567. doi: 10.1089/pho.2018.4499. Epub 2018 Sep 22. — View Citation

Sambhi RS, Sambhi GDS, Mather R, Malvankar-Mehta MS. Dry eye after refractive surgery: a meta-analysis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;55(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Aug 20. — View Citation

Schein OD, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Dec;124(6):723-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71688-5. — View Citation

Taudorf EH, Olsen J, Lindso Andersen P, Bouazzi D, Jemec GBE. Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Telangiectasia Prior to Intense Pulsed Light Treatment-An Opportunity to Target Treatment? Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Feb;53(2):212-218. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23280. Epub 2020 Jun 12. — View Citation

Tavassoli S, Wong N, Chan E. Ocular manifestations of rosacea: A clinical review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;49(2):104-117. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13900. Epub 2021 Feb 3. — View Citation

Thode AR, Latkany RA. Current and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD). Drugs. 2015 Jul;75(11):1177-85. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0432-8. — View Citation

Tsubota K, Yokoi N, Shimazaki J, Watanabe H, Dogru M, Yamada M, Kinoshita S, Kim HM, Tchah HW, Hyon JY, Yoon KC, Seo KY, Sun X, Chen W, Liang L, Li M, Liu Z; Asia Dry Eye Society. New Perspectives on Dry Eye Definition and Diagnosis: A Consensus Report by the Asia Dry Eye Society. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jan;15(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 8. — View Citation

Uchino Y, Uchino M, Dogru M, Ward S, Yokoi N, Tsubota K. Changes in dry eye diagnostic status following implementation of revised Japanese dry eye diagnostic criteria. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;56(1):8-13. doi: 10.1007/s10384-011-0099-y. Epub 2011 Nov 15. — View Citation

Valencia-Nieto L, Novo-Diez A, Blanco-Vazquez M, Lopez-Miguel A. Therapeutic Instruments Targeting Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(4):797-807. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00304-3. Epub 2020 Sep 24. — View Citation

Viso E, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Abelenda D, Oubina B, Gude F. Prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic meibomian gland dysfunction in the general population of Spain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 4;53(6):2601-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-9228. — View Citation

Wang B, Wu Y, Luo YJ, Xu XG, Xu TH, Chen JZ, Gao XH, Chen HD, Li YH. Combination of intense pulsed light and fractional CO(2) laser treatments for patients with acne with inflammatory and scarring lesions. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2013 Jun;38(4):344-51. doi: 10.1111/ced.12010. Epub 2013 Apr 3. — View Citation

Weiss RA, Ross EV, Tanghetti EA, Vasily DB, Childs JJ, Smirnov MZ, Altshuler GB. Characterization of an optimized light source and comparison to pulsed dye laser for superficial and deep vessel clearance. Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Feb;43(2):92-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21032. — View Citation

Yang L, Pazo EE, Zhang Q, Wu Y, Song Y, Qin G, Zhang H, Li J, Xu L, He W. Treatment of contact lens related dry eye with intense pulsed light. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2022 Apr;45(2):101449. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101449. Epub 2021 Apr 28. — View Citation

Yokoi N, Takehisa Y, Kinoshita S. Correlation of tear lipid layer interference patterns with the diagnosis and severity of dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Dec;122(6):818-24. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70378-2. — View Citation

Zhang XM, Yang LT, Zhang Q, Fan QX, Zhang C, You Y, Zhang CG, Lin TZ, Xu L, Moutari S, Moore JE, Pazo EE, He W. Reliability of Chinese web-based ocular surface disease index questionnaire in dry eye patients: a randomized, crossover study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 18;14(6):834-843. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.06.07. eCollection 2021. — View Citation

* Note: There are 29 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	LTA	Lymphotoxin-alpha (LTA) is a member of the tumor necrosisfactor (TNF) superfamily and is expressed by a variety of cells, including T cells, B cells and natural killer cells. LTA secreted to the extracellular space assembles into a homotrimer (LTa3) as a soluble protein [23], and binds to the tumor necrosis factor receptor to play a role. LTA will be measured using an immunochromatography assay by collecting 1ul tear samples from the lateral canthus using a capillary tear collector. To assess the concentration of LTA in the tear samples, a commercial reagent card (S05B, Seinda Biomedical Corporation, Guangdong, China) based on colloidal gold and immunochromatographic analysis was utilized.	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84
Primary	Non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT)	Non-invasive initial tear film breaking time will be assessed using the Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) topographer.; Three sequentially readings will be captured, and the median value will be included in the final analysis. The median value will be recorded.	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84
Secondary	Fluorescein and lissamine conjunctival and cornea staining (CFS)	Fluorescein and lissamine staining of the ocular surface will be divided into three zones comprising nasal conjunctival, corneal, and temporal conjunctival areas. The staining score ranged from 0 to 3 for each zone, yielding a total score of 0-9 for the ocular surface. Higher scores means worse.	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84
Secondary	Meibomian quality	Meibum quality will be assessed under a slit-lamp: Five meibomian gland in the middle parts of the eyelid will be assessed using a scale of 0 to 3 for each gland (0 represented clear meibum; 1 represented cloudy meibum; 2 represented cloudy and granular meibum; and 3 represented thick, toothpaste like consistency meibum)	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84
Secondary	Tear Film Lipid Layer Score(TFLL)	Tear Film Lipid Layer interferometry will be assessed using DR-1 (Kowa, Nagoya, Japan). The results will be graded as follows: grade 1, somewhat gray color, uniform distribution; grade 2, somewhat gray color, nonuniform distribution; grade 3, a few colors, nonuniform distribution; grade 4, many colors, nonuniform distribution; grade 5, corneal surface partially exposed.	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84
Secondary	Tear meniscus height (TMH)	TMH using the Keratograph 5M (Oculus, Germany) topographer will be measured three times consecutively and the median value was recorded.	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84
Secondary	Conjunctival hyperemia (RS score)	Conjunctival hyperemia (RS score) will be assessed by Keratograph image (Oculus, Germany) of 1156*873 pixels, redness score (RS) (accurate to 0.1 U) was displayed on the computer screen that ranged from 0.0 (normal) to 4.0 (severe).	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84
Secondary	Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)	The patient will answer each question on a scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating 'none of the time' and 4 indicating 'all of the time'. If a certain question is deemed irrelevant, it will be marked as 'not applicable (N/A)' and excluded from the analysis. The OSDI total score is calculated according to the following formula. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing more severe cases of dry eye syndrome	Day-0 (baseline), day-21, day-42, day-63 and day-84