Dry Eye Syndromes Clinical Trial
Official title:
Feasibility of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) for Reducing Dry Eye Symptoms Caused by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD)
Verified date | February 2017 |
Source | Lumenis Ltd. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if, in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), treatment with the Lumenis M22 Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) system causes a reduction in dry eye symptoms post-treatment, compared to pre-treatment.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 44 |
Est. completion date | January 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Able to read, understand and sign an Informed Consent (IC) form 2. 18-80 years of age 3. Fitzpatrick skin type 1-4 4. Able and willing to comply with the treatment/follow-up schedule and requirements 5. At least 5 non-atrophied glands on each eye's lower eyelid 6. Current diagnosis of moderate to severe MGD in both eyes, including 2 of the following 5 criteria: - Tear break-up time (TBUT) = 10 seconds in both eyes; - Meibomian gland (MG) score (using the Abbreviated MGD grading system for clinical trials) = 11 in both eyes - Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) score (using the Baylor grading scheme) = 10 in both eyes; - Tear Osmolarity = 310 milliosmol/L in both eyes, or a difference higher than 8 milliosmol/L between the two eyes - SPEED = 10 7. Women of child-bearing age are required to be using a reliable method of birth control (such as an intrauterine device, birth control pills, condom with spermicidal, Nuvaring and partner with vasectomy or abstinence) at least 3 months prior to enrollment and throughout the course of the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Contact lens wearer within the past 1 month and throughout the study 2. Recent ocular surgery or eyelid surgery within the past 6 months 3. Neuro-paralysis in the planned treatment area within the past 6 months 4. Other uncontrolled eye disorders affecting the ocular surface 5. Current use of punctal plugs 6. Pre-cancerous lesions, skin cancer or pigmented lesions in the planned treatment area 7. Uncontrolled infections or uncontrolled immunosuppressive diseases 8. Subjects who have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the past 6 months 9. Diseases in the planned treatment area that could be stimulated by light at 560 nm to 1200 nm (e.g., Herpes simplex 1 and 2, Systemic Lupus erythematosus, porphyria) 10. Use of photosensitive medication and/or herbs that may cause sensitivity to 560-1200 nm light exposure, such as Isotretinoin, Tetracycline, or St. John's Wort 11. Over exposure to sun within the past 4 weeks, in the judgment of the treating physician 12. Pregnancy and nursing 13. Administration of prescription eye drops for dry eye within the past 48 hours, excluding artificial tears 14. Radiation therapy to the head or neck within the past year, or planned radiation therapy within 8 weeks after completion of all IPL treatments 15. Treatment with chemotherapeutic agent within the past 8 weeks, or planned chemotherapy within 8 weeks after completion of all IPL treatments 16. New topical treatments within the area to be treated, or oral therapies within the past 3 months, except over-the-counter acetaminophen-based analgesics (such as Extra Strength Tylenol®) for pain management after study treatment 17. Change in dosage of any systemic medication within the past 3 months 18. Anticipated relocation or extensive travel outside of the local study area preventing compliance with follow-up within the next 16 weeks 19. Any condition revealed during the eligibility screening process whereby the physician deems the subject inappropriate for this study 20. Declared legally blind in one eye 21. History of migraines, seizures or epilepsy 22. IPL treatment within the past 12 months 23. Lipiflow treatment, or any equivalent treatment, within the past 12 months 24. Expression of the meibomian glands within the past 12 months |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Dell Laser Consultants | Austin | Texas |
United States | Gaster Eye Center | Beverly Hills | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Lumenis Ltd. |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Incidence of treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events | Evaluation will be done by subject's report and/or by the physician's judgment | 1 day after baseline; 1 week after baseline ; 3 weeks after baseline (Tx2); 6 weeks after baseline (Tx3); 9 weeks after baseline (Tx4/FU1); 12 weeks after baseline (FU2); and 15 weeks after baseline (FU3) | |
Other | immediate/short term skin response | Evaluation will be done by the physician judgment | At Baseline (Tx1); 3 weeks after baseline (Tx2); 6 weeks after baseline (Tx3); and 9 weeks after baseline (Tx4/FU1) | |
Other | Subjective level of pain/discomfort. | Evaluation will be done by the subject, using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | At Baseline (Tx1); 3 weeks after baseline (Tx2); 6 weeks after baseline (Tx3); and 9 weeks after baseline (Tx4/FU1) | |
Primary | Tear Break-up time in seconds, using the standard Fluorescein staining method | The number of seconds that elapse between the last blink of the eye to the appearance of the first dry spot in the tear film | from Baseline to 3 weeks after the 3rd treatment and 3 weeks after the fourth/final treatment | |
Secondary | Corneal fluorescein staining score, using the Baylor Scheme | The cornea will be viewed and logically divided to 5 zones: central, superior, inferior, temporal and nasal. In each of the 5 zones, grading will be as follows: 0 dots = 0; 1-5 dots = 1; 16-30 dots = 3; > 30 dots = 4; One point will be added to the score in case of 1 area of confluent staining. Two points will be added to the score in case of two or more areas of confluent staining. The total score is the sum of scores in the 5 zones | from Baseline to 3 weeks after the 3rd treatment; 3 weeks after the fourth/final treatment; 6 weeks after the final treatment | |
Secondary | Meibomian gland score, using the "Abbreviated MGD grading system for clinical trials" | Thickening of the upper lid margin (0-3, where 0 is normal and 3 is severe). A value of at least 1 (mild) is consistent with DED. Vascularity of the upper lid margin (0-3, where 0 is normal and 3 is severe engorgement). A value of at least 1 (mild engorgement) is consistent with DED. Number of telangiectasias (0-3, where 0 = none, 1 = single, 2 = two to four and 3 = above four). A value of at least 2 (2-4 telangiectasias) is consistent with DED. Of the central 10 glands of the upper eyelid- number of plugged glands: a value of at least 2 is consistent with DED. The total score is computed by summing the scores of the 8 categories above. |
from Baseline to 3 weeks after the 3rd treatment; 3 weeks after the fourth/final treatment; 6 weeks after the final treatment | |
Secondary | Subjective symptoms, using the SPEED questionnaire | SPEED is a validated questionnaire for quantifying the subjective symptoms of DED. The questionnaire will be filled by the study investigator (with questions answered by the subject). In 4 symptoms are evaluated: (1) dryness, grittiness or scratchiness; (2) Soreness or Irritation; (3) Burning or watering; and (4) Eye fatigue. Two types of questions are asked about these symptoms: frequency and severity. In the Frequency questions, subjects evaluate the 4 symptoms above on a 0-3 scale: 0 = Never; 1 = Sometimes; 2 = Often; and 3 = All the time. In the Severity questions, subjects evaluate the 4 symptoms above on a 0-4 scale: 0 = No problems; 1 = Tolerable (not perfect but not uncomfortable); 2 = Uncomfortable (irritating but does not interfere with my day); 3 = Bothersome (irritating and interferes with my day); and (4) Intolerable (unable to perform my daily tasks). The total score is the sum of the Frequency answers and the Severity answers. |
from Baseline to 3 weeks after the 3rd treatment; 3 weeks after the fourth/final treatment; 6 weeks after the final treatment | |
Secondary | Tear Osmolarity in milliosmol/liter, using a lab-on-a-chip system to simultaneously collect and analyze the electrical impedance of a tear sample | In this current study, tear osmolarity will be measured using a lab-on-a-chip system to simultaneously collect and analyze the electrical impedance of a tear sample (TearLab, San Diego, CA, USA). A small tear sample of 50 nL will be collected from the lower meniscus, using a disposable test chip by passive capillary action, and transferred to the device. Several seconds after the transfer, readings will be given in milliOsmol/L | from Baseline to 3 weeks after the 3rd treatment; 3 weeks after the fourth/final treatment; 6 weeks after the final treatment | |
Secondary | Lipid Layer Thickness in nanometers, using an interferometer | lipid layer thickness will be measured using an interferometer. In interferometry, when white light is projected over the cornea, a color interference pattern is produced due to specular reflection at the lipid-aqueous interface. The reflected colors from the tear film are captured on a high-resolution video. Each recorded pixel is analyzed, and compared with a color progression table. The output is expressed as interference color units (ICUS), which correlate with lipid layer thickness | from Baseline to 3 weeks after the 3rd treatment; 3 weeks after the fourth/final treatment; 6 weeks after the final treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04425551 -
Effect of Micropulse Laser on Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06379685 -
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of PRO-190 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Systane Ultra® on the Ocular Surface.
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04701086 -
3 Month Study of Cationorm Pro Versus Vismed in Adults With Dry Eye Disease Related to Keratitis or Keratoconjunctivitis
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03697876 -
Safety and Tolerability of the Ophthalmic Gel PRO-165 Versus Artelac® Nightime Gel
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02910713 -
Evaluation of Dry Eye Symptoms in CAE With Application of Intranasal Neurostimulation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02815293 -
Topical Ophthalmic AGN-195263 for the Treatment of Evaporative Dry Eye
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04104997 -
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of GLH8NDE After Single and Mutiple Ocular Administrations in Healthy Korean and Caucasian Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02595606 -
0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Dry Eye of Diabetic Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01711424 -
An Observational Study of OPTIVE PLUS® for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01202747 -
Evaluation of Screening Methods for Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01015209 -
Safety and Tolerability of Chitosan-N-acetylcysteine Eye Drops in Healthy Young Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00969280 -
Acupuncture for Dry Eye Syndrome
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00756678 -
Efficacy and Acceptability of Two Lubricant Eye Drops
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01496482 -
Comparison of Evaporimetry With the Established Methods of Tear Film Measurement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00739713 -
Effects of Sea Buckthorn Oil on Dry Eye
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00349440 -
Efficacy of Cyclosporine for the Prevention and Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms Following LASIK or Photorefractive Keratectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00370747 -
Efficacy and Safety Study for Ecabet Ophthalmic Solution for Treating Dry Eye Syndrome
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05162261 -
to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® , VS LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02871440 -
A Two Comparator, Controlled Phase 3 Study in Patients With and Without Evaporative Dry Eye
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05042960 -
Computer Screen Properties Study
|
N/A |