Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02435914
Other study ID # 223575-002
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date June 2015
Est. completion date January 2016

Study information

Verified date March 2019
Source Allergan
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, tolerability, and systemic pharmacokinetics of 3 different doses of topical ophthalmic AGN-223575 suspension compared to AGN-223575 vehicle in patients with dry eye disease.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 236
Est. completion date January 2016
Est. primary completion date January 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Signs and symptoms of dry eye disease

- Has used RESTASIS and/or artificial tears in both eyes twice a day for at least 60 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of glaucoma, or ocular hypertension

- Diagnosis of ocular infection

- Use of contact lenses in the past 14 days or expected use during the study

- Use of any topical ophthalmic medications in the past 30 days

- Use of corticosteroids in the past 30 days.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
AGN-223575 ophthalmic solution
AGN-223575 ophthalmic solution once or twice daily
AGN-223575 vehicle ophthalmic solution
Vehicle to AGN22375 ophthalmic solution once or twice daily.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Keystone Clinical Research Austin Texas
United States Tufts Medical Center/ Tufts University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts
United States Bluestein Custom Vision Charleston South Carolina
United States SE Clinical Research Associates, LLC/ Charolette Eye Ear Nose Charlotte North Carolina
United States Eye Care Associates of Greater Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio
United States Eye Associates of Colorado Springs Colorado Springs Colorado
United States Carolinas Centers for Sight, PC Florence South Carolina
United States Specialty Eye Ctr. Med. Group Glendale California
United States Cornerstone Eye Care High Point North Carolina
United States Chicago Cornea Consultants Hoffman Estates Illinois
United States Houston Eye Associates Houston Texas
United States Whitsett Vision Group Houston Texas
United States Moyes Eye Center Kansas City Missouri
United States West Coast Eye Institute Lecanto Florida
United States Kentucky Center for Vision Lexington Kentucky
United States Eye Care Centers Management, Inc. Morrow Georgia
United States Raymond Fong MD, PC New York New York
United States The Eye Research Foundation Newport Beach California
United States Durrie Vision Overland Park Kansas
United States Arizona Center for Clinical Trials Phoenix Arizona
United States Mark A. Terry, MD PC/ Devers Eye Institute Portland Oregon
United States Black Hills Regional Eye Institute Rapid City South Dakota
United States Coastal Research Assoc. LLC Roswell Georgia
United States Ophthalmology Associates Saint Louis Missouri
United States Medical Center Opth. Assoc. San Antonio Texas
United States WCCT Global Santa Ana California
United States South Shore Eye Care LLP Wantagh New York
United States Comprehensive Eye Care Ltd. Washington Missouri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Allergan

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Redness Score in the Study Eye Using a 5-Point Scale Nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctival hyperemia were graded separately in each eye by the investigator under slit-lamp magnification by assigning a score of 0 to 4 for each quadrant based on comparison to the Allergan Dry Eye Redness Scale with photographic reference where: 0=Normal, vessels of bulbar conjunctiva are easily observed; 1=Trace redness; 2=Mild redness; 3=Moderate redness; 4=Severe redness, and each score is associated with a reference photo. For each eye, the study quadrant was determined by the greater (more severe) of the baseline redness scores for nasal and temporal bulbar conjunctival hyperemia as assessed using the Allergan Dry Eye Redness Scale. If the temporal score was greater than the nasal score, then the temporal quadrant was the study quadrant for the eye and was used to assess primary efficacy; otherwise the nasal quadrant was the study quadrant. A negative change from baseline (less redness) indicates improvement. Baseline, Day 14
Secondary Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score Using a 5-Point Scale OSDI questionnaire consists of 12 questions regarding ocular symptoms, environmental triggers, and vision-related functioning in patients with dry eye disease. The participants rate each question on a 5-point scale where: 0=none of the time to 4=all of the time. The scores are totaled over the 12 questions and normalized/converted to a total score of 0=no disability to 100=complete disability. Higher OSDI scores are associated with greater severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, Day 14
Secondary Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining Score of the Study Eye Using a 6-Point Scale The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. Staining of the cornea following ocular administration of fluorescein dye was graded using a 6-point scale where: 0=no staining to 5=diffuse staining. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline, Day 14
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Complete Redness Response (Yes/No) in the Study Eye A participant was considered a redness responder if the study quadrant redness score based on the Allergan Dry Eye Redness Scale in the study eye was 0=Normal (no redness). Day 14
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT04425551 - Effect of Micropulse Laser on Dry Eye Disease Due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06379685 - Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of PRO-190 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Systane Ultra® on the Ocular Surface. Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04701086 - 3 Month Study of Cationorm Pro Versus Vismed in Adults With Dry Eye Disease Related to Keratitis or Keratoconjunctivitis N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03697876 - Safety and Tolerability of the Ophthalmic Gel PRO-165 Versus Artelac® Nightime Gel Phase 1
Completed NCT02910713 - Evaluation of Dry Eye Symptoms in CAE With Application of Intranasal Neurostimulation N/A
Terminated NCT02815293 - Topical Ophthalmic AGN-195263 for the Treatment of Evaporative Dry Eye Phase 3
Completed NCT04104997 - A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of GLH8NDE After Single and Mutiple Ocular Administrations in Healthy Korean and Caucasian Volunteers Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02595606 - 0.3% Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Dry Eye of Diabetic Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT01711424 - An Observational Study of OPTIVE PLUS® for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease N/A
Completed NCT01202747 - Evaluation of Screening Methods for Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT01015209 - Safety and Tolerability of Chitosan-N-acetylcysteine Eye Drops in Healthy Young Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT00969280 - Acupuncture for Dry Eye Syndrome Phase 3
Completed NCT01496482 - Comparison of Evaporimetry With the Established Methods of Tear Film Measurement N/A
Completed NCT00756678 - Efficacy and Acceptability of Two Lubricant Eye Drops Phase 4
Completed NCT00739713 - Effects of Sea Buckthorn Oil on Dry Eye N/A
Completed NCT00349440 - Efficacy of Cyclosporine for the Prevention and Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms Following LASIK or Photorefractive Keratectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT00370747 - Efficacy and Safety Study for Ecabet Ophthalmic Solution for Treating Dry Eye Syndrome Phase 2
Completed NCT05162261 - to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Tixel® , VS LipiFlow® in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction N/A
Completed NCT02871440 - A Two Comparator, Controlled Phase 3 Study in Patients With and Without Evaporative Dry Eye Phase 3
Completed NCT05042960 - Computer Screen Properties Study N/A