View clinical trials related to Dry Eye Syndrome.
Filter by:A multicenter, Randomized, Double blind, Restasis®-controlled Non-inferiority, Moisview® Eye Drops-controlled Superiority, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HU007 Eye Drops in Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome
A Multi-Center, Phase 2b, Randomized, Double Masked, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled, Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Reproxalap Ophthalmic Solution (0.25% and 0.1%) Compared to Vehicle in Subjects with Dry Eye Disease
The aim of the current study is to examine the contribution of intense pulsed light (IPL) for relieving signs and symptoms of dry eye due to meibomian gland dysfunction. The effect of IPL will be examined in a study designed as a randomized controlled trial. In the study arm, subjects will undergo 4 treatment sessions, consisting of IPL pulses immediately followed by meibomian gland expression (MGX). In the control arm, subjects will undergo the same treatments, except that the IPL pulses will be disabled. For each subject, the duration of the study will be 10 weeks, as explained in the detailed description.
Dry eye syndrome and ocular surface disease are very important ophthalmologic diseases. It is known that various inducers are involved. However, it is still necessary to study how influencing factors are related to dry eye syndrome and ocular surface disease and how treatment for dry eye syndrome and ocular surface disease is helpful.
Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-087 versus Systane ® Ultra and Systane ® Ultra Preservative Free on the Tear Film Dysfunction Syndrome from Mild to Moderate Clinical trial To evaluate the effectiveness of preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) to restore the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the ocular surface, as well as its distribution and the characteristics of the mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome compared to Systane ® Ultra and Ultra Systane ® preservative free (by Laboratorios Alcon, S.A. de C.V.). Controlled, randomized, double-blind, masked clinical study, comparing the safety and efficacy of preservative-free PR0-087 vs Systane Ultra with preservative and Systane Ultra preservative free, in subjects with mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome, for a period of 90 days plus 15 days of remote surveillance, in which one of the three agents will be administered (PR0-087, Systane® Ultra or Systane® Ultra preservative free) with a q.i.d. dosage. in both eyes, with regular follow-up visits (5 overall). Best-corrected visual acuity Intraocular pressure Ocular surface Anterior segment examination Posterior segment examination Tear film break-up time Schirmer test Corneal epithelization Goblet cells count Adverse events Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome between 18 and 90 years old, without concomitant eye diseases nor requiring different treatments of any of the three interventions in this study They will be randomized in 3 groups where PRO-087, Systane® Ultra o Systane® Ultra preservative free will be administered.
In subjects with Dry Eye Syndrome: The primary objective of this study is to compare the safety and tolerability of TOP1630 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo. The secondary objectives are to compare the efficacy of TOP1630 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye syndrome.
Serum eye drops (SEDs) are used to treat patients with extreme dry eyes and other corneal defects. Serum is used in severe ophthalmic cases where conventional eye drops (artificial tears) have insufficient effect. The use of SEDs in dry eye patients usually has a rapid effect. Most patients claim the effect to be instantaneous, and all symptoms improve within 48 hours. There is evidence suggesting that substances in serum may help in the healing of epithelial defects, such as epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, fibronectin, and/or vitamin A. However, the precise serum factor responsible for alleviating the patient's complaints is currently not known. Commonly, autologous SEDs are used, but they are replaced more and more by allogeneic SEDs prepared from donor serum. Allogeneic SED are derived from healthy voluntary, non-remunerated male donors with blood group AB. The use of allogeneic SED could provide blood bank controlled quality, a safer product in larger quantities that is quickly available for each patient. No double-blind randomized trials are known to exist to detect a difference in result between the effect of allogeneic SED or autologous SED. This pilot study is intended to obtain insight in the ability of autologous and allogeneic SEDs to improve patient dry eye sensation. Our hypothesis is that autologous SEDs (in a 1:1 dilution with saline) result in an improvement of the patient dry eye sensation, while allogeneic SEDs (in a 1:1 dilution with saline) do not.
Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common condition causing burden on visual function and reducing quality of life. Corticosteroids and/or cyclosporine eye drops are able to improve DED symptoms, however, side effects of immune suppression and cost lead patients often to suspend treatment. Consequently, is important to identify therapies alleviating DED symptoms. A randomized, controlled, single masked study, was performed in 40 patients affected by mild to moderate DED, to evaluate efficacy and safety of a collyrium based on cross-linked hyaluronic acid (XLHA) added with Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) in comparison to an eye drop considered a gold standard for tear substitutes, based on hyaluronic acid (HA) 0.15%. Methods: eye drops were administered four times a day for 90 days to enrolled subjects divided in two groups: group A treated with XLHA+CoQ10, group B treated with HA. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), fundus exam, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining, corneal esthesiometry, corneal confocal microscopy, were performed at different visits until the 90th day.
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of RGN-259 Ophthalmic Solutions to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.