Propofol vs. Midazolam-based Balanced Propofol for Nonanesthesiologist Moderate Sedation in Colonoscopy

Drug Safety Clinical Trial

— MIDAPROP  

Official title:

Phase 4, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Study Comparing Propofol vs. Midazolam Plus Propofol for Nonanesthesiologist Targeted Moderate Sedation in Outpatient Colonoscopy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01428882
• Other study ID #: MIDP11
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• First received: September 2, 2011
• Last updated: December 15, 2011
• Start date: June 2011
• Est. completion date: December 2011

Study information

• Verified date: December 2011
• Source: Infante, Javier Molina, M.D.
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Spain: Spanish Agency of Medicines
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for sedation is actually a field of growing interest for endoscopists, as demonstrated by recent American and European guidelines on this issue. Propofol is a hypnotic drug with rapid onset and offset of action. Used as a single agent, it is commonly titrated to deep sedation, whereas balanced propofol sedation (BPS), which combines propofol with small doses of a benzodiazepine and/or an opioid, can be successfully titrated to moderate sedation. However, nonanesthesiologists propofol administration remains controversial on account of the possibility of deep sedation/general anesthesia related adverse events. On the other hand, the use of longer elimination half-life drugs, such as opioids and benzodiazepines, may theoretically prolong sedation and recovery.

Up to date, no study has addressed a head-to-head comparison of both regimens administered by non-anesthesiologists and titrated to moderate sedation.

This study aims to evaluate the impact on propofol sedation of premedication with a fixed dose of midazolam (2 mg)2 minutes before propofol administration targeted to moderate sedation, in terms of depth of sedation, recovery times, safety and satisfaction.

The onset of sedative action of midazolam has been reported to be 1-2.5 minutes and the peak effect of midazolam occurs 8-12 minutes. Taking into account that colonoscopy usually lasts a minimum of 15-20 minutes, our hypothesis is that synergy between propofol and midazolam may increase the depth of sedation through the initial phases of the procedure, diminishing propofol requirements, but not prolonging significantly recovery times.

Description:

Justification of the study:

Nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol is controversial owing to deep sedation concerns. One of the latest therapeutic innovations on this issue has been the development of balanced propofol sedation, which consists of adding low doses of opioids or benzodiazepins. Several studies have recently demonstrated that BPS allows successfully moderate sedation, maintains a reversible drug component, reduces the total dose of propofol even by more than 50% without increasing adverse events and maintains high levels of physician and patient satisfaction, even for advanced endoscopic procedure. However, recovery may be prolonged by using midazolam or meperidine as they have a longer elimination half-life than propofol has.

Up to date, nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol and BPS, using either midazolam or fentanyl, for outpatient colonoscopy have been compared in a single non-placebo controlled randomized trial (VanNatta and Rex, 2006). In this study, the authors obtained shorter recovery times with BPS compared to propofol alone, in contrast with the expected on account of pharmacokinetics. These results can be easily understood yet single-agent propofol was titrated to deep sedation, whereas BPS was titrated to moderate sedation.

Therefore, it is necessary to make a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to directly compare both sedation regimens targeted to a similar moderate level of sedation. The results of this study will conclude which should be the first line treatment for moderate sedation in colonoscopy, providing further insight in drug synergy and its impact on the depth of sedation and recovery times

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 135
• Est. completion date: December 2011
• Est. primary completion date: October 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• All patients undergoing elective outpatient colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

• Age less than 18 years

• Allergy to propofol, soybeans, eggs or midazolam

• Chronic intake of benzodiazepines

• History of colorectal surgery

• ASA class IV, short and tick neck, difficult intubation due to inability to open the mouth widely

• Pregnancy

• Refusal, inability or unwillingness to give written consent

• Patients scheduled for advanced therapeutic colonoscopy or for more than one endoscopic procedure

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Drug Safety

Intervention

Drug:
• Midazolam
Midazolam (5 mg/5 mL) 2 mg before standard propofol induction (0.5-1.5 mg/Kg) and boluses-based sedation during colonoscopy, targeted to a moderate sedation level
• Propofol
Placebo (normal saline 2 ml) before standard propofol induction (0.5-1.5 mg/Kg) and boluses-based sedation during colonoscopy, targeted to a moderate sedation level

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara	Caceres

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Infante, Javier Molina, M.D.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (17)

Cohen LB, Dubovsky AN, Aisenberg J, Miller KM. Propofol for endoscopic sedation: A protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Nov;58(5):725-32. — View Citation

Cohen LB, Hightower CD, Wood DA, Miller KM, Aisenberg J. Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jun;59(7):795-803. — View Citation

Cohen LB. Making 1+1=3: improving sedation through drug synergy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):215-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.027. — View Citation

Cohen LB. Sedation issues in quality colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Oct;20(4):615-27. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Aug 21. Review. — View Citation

Dumonceau JM, Riphaus A, Aparicio JR, Beilenhoff U, Knape JT, Ortmann M, Paspatis G, Ponsioen CY, Racz I, Schreiber F, Vilmann P, Wehrmann T, Wientjes C, Walder B; NAAP Task Force Members. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology Guideline: Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2010 Nov;42(11):960-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255728. Epub 2010 Nov 11. — View Citation

Kerker A, Hardt C, Schlief HE, Dumoulin FL. Combined sedation with midazolam/propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan 27;10:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-11. — View Citation

Lee CK, Lee SH, Chung IK, Lee TH, Park SH, Kim EO, Lee SH, Kim HS, Kim SJ. Balanced propofol sedation for therapeutic GI endoscopic procedures: a prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.035. Epub 2010 Dec 18. — View Citation

McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 May;67(6):910-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.046. Review. — View Citation

Padmanabhan U, Leslie K, Eer AS, Maruff P, Silbert BS. Early cognitive impairment after sedation for colonoscopy: the effect of adding midazolam and/or fentanyl to propofol. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1448-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a6ad31. Epub 2009 Jul 17. — View Citation

Paspatis GA, Manolaraki M, Xirouchakis G, Papanikolaou N, Chlouverakis G, Gritzali A. Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Aug;97(8):1963-7. — View Citation

Rex DK, Deenadayalu V, Eid E. Gastroenterologist-directed propofol: an update. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008 Oct;18(4):717-25, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2008.06.002. Review. — View Citation

Rex DK, Deenadayalu VP, Eid E, Imperiale TF, Walker JA, Sandhu K, Clarke AC, Hillman LC, Horiuchi A, Cohen LB, Heuss LT, Peter S, Beglinger C, Sinnott JA, Welton T, Rofail M, Subei I, Sleven R, Jordan P, Goff J, Gerstenberger PD, Munnings H, Tagle M, Sipe BW, Wehrmann T, Di Palma JA, Occhipinti KE, Barbi E, Riphaus A, Amann ST, Tohda G, McClellan T, Thueson C, Morse J, Meah N. Endoscopist-directed administration of propofol: a worldwide safety experience. Gastroenterology. 2009 Oct;137(4):1229-37; quiz 1518-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.06.042. Epub 2009 Jun 21. Review. — View Citation

Rex DK. Review article: moderate sedation for endoscopy: sedation regimens for non-anaesthesiologists. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul 15;24(2):163-71. Review. — View Citation

Singh H, Poluha W, Cheung M, Choptain N, Baron KI, Taback SP. Propofol for sedation during colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD006268. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006268.pub2. Review. — View Citation

Sipe BW, Scheidler M, Baluyut A, Wright B. A prospective safety study of a low-dose propofol sedation protocol for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;5(5):563-6. — View Citation

VanNatta ME, Rex DK. Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2209-17. — View Citation

Vargo JJ, Cohen LB, Rex DK, Kwo PY. Position statement: nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec;70(6):1053-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.020. — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Level of sedation throughout the entire procedure		3 months	No
Secondary	Duration of recovery after the endoscopic procedure		3 months	No
Secondary	Rate of sedation-related complications during the procedure and the recovery phases		3 months	No
Secondary	Rate of patients and physician satisfaction with sedation		3 months	No