The Effect of ENZAlutamide on the Anti-Xa Levels of Patients Receiving DOACs

Drug Interaction Clinical Trial

— ENZA-D  

Official title:

A Pilot Study To Investigate the Effect of ENZAlutamide on the Anti-Xa Levels of Patients Receiving Direct-acting Anticoagulants (DOACS) (ENZA-D)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03920566
• Other study ID #: CCR 5039
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: May 2019
• Est. completion date: April 2020

Study information

• Verified date: April 2019
• Source: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
• Contact: Emma Foreman
• Phone: 0208 6426011
• Email: Emma.Foreman[@]rmh.nhs.uk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to determine the nature and significance of the theoretical drug interaction between enzalutamide (a drug used to treat prostate cancer) and the direct-acting oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs). This will be done in two ways: a laboratory study which will take place at the University of Brighton, and a clinical study in which patients will be identified who are currently taking DOACs and are due to start treatment with enzalutamide. The activity of the DOAC will be monitored using anti-Xa levels before and after commencing treatment with enzalutamide.

Description:

Enzalutamide is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Unfortunately however, enzalutamide can sometimes interact with other medicines that the patient is taking, altering their concentration in the blood-stream. Enzalutamide can do this in two ways: either by increasing the breakdown of a medicine, or by blocking a special protein, called p-glycoprotein, that pumps it out of the body. An example of a medicine whose breakdown is increased by enzalutamide is warfarin. Warfarin is used to prevent, and treat blood clots that have formed in the deep veins of the legs (deep vein thrombosis or DVT) or have become lodged in blood vessels in the lungs (pulmonary embolism or PE). As enzalutamide is known to reduce the effect of warfarin, the manufacturer advises avoiding using the two medicines together. Instead,we can use a new class of medicines called the direct oral anticoagulants, or DOACs.

DOACs have an additional advantage over warfarin in that they do not require regular monitoring with blood tests. We, and other experts in the field believe that there may be a problem using DOACs and enzalutamide together, however scientific evidence suggests that enzalutamide may stop the p-glycoprotein pump from working properly, and alter its ability to pump out a range of medicines. Other evidence suggests that under certain conditions, enzalutamide may actually increase the activity of P-glycoprotein, and reduce the concentration of other medicines in the bloodstream. However, there is no scientific evidence, or evidence from patients, that has looked directly at thecombination of enzalutamide and DOACs together. Because no routine monitoring is carried out with DOACs, we are not sure of the extent of this problem, but the consequences of over or underdosing could be serious.

We have recently generated some preliminary data in our laboratory which has the measured the extent of this interaction, but we need to repeat these experiments before we can draw any firm conclusions from them. In this pilot study, we will explore the potential interaction between enzalutamide and DOACs. First, we will measure the activity of DOACs in patients who are due to start treatment with enzalutamide using a simple, well established blood test. We will then repeat this blood test after the first month of treatment, along with regular blood tests, to determine if there has been a change in the effectiveness of the DOAC. Second, we aim to build uponour laboratory data, and examine whether brief, or prolonged exposure to enzalutamide affects the ability of p-glycoproteinto pump out DOACs.

Our aims are to

1. determine if enzalutamide interacts with DOACs in patients recruited from an advanced prostatecancer clinic

2. understand in greater detail the nature of any interaction between enzalutamide and DOACs in the laboratory

3. assess the feasibility of expanding this study to generate sufficient evidence to make recommendations for clinical practice.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 15
• Est. completion date: April 2020
• Est. primary completion date: April 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male patients aged > 18 years old

• Diagnosis of castrate resistant metastatic prostate cancer

• Due to commence treatment with enzalutamide

• Currently prescribed edoxaban, rivaroxaban or apixaban

• Calculated CrCl (Cockroft & Gault) > 30ml/min

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients <18 years old

• Due to stop edoxaban/ rivaroxaban / apixaban during study period (i.e. within 4 weeks of recruitment)

• Currently taking other medicines which induce or inhibit P-gp or increase/reduce the effect of apixaban or rivaroxaban (e.g. verapamil, ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, ritonavir, clarithromycin, erythromycin (refer to appendix 1 for complete list)

• Currently taking any herbal/complimentary medicines (other than homeopathic products)

• Calculated CrCl (Cockroft & Gault) <30ml/min

• Severe hepatic impairment (Childs-Pugh class C)

• Lacks capacity, including patients with documented dementia (or psychometric marker e.g. Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) <7/10) or inability to give informed consent for study participation.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Drug Interaction

Intervention

Other:
• Anti-Xa level
Anti-Xa level taken before commencing enzalutamide and repeated after 4 weeks of treatment

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust	Pharmacy Research UK, University of Brighton

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Anti-Xa level	Difference between anti-Xa levels taken at two time points (baseline and 4-weeks after commencing enzalutamide)	time 0 and time 4 weeks
Primary	Efflux ratio (with enzalutamide)	Difference in efflux ratio for edoxaban/ rivaroxaban / apixaban in the absence/presence of enzalutamide over a range of concentrations	Each experiment will be conducted over a period of <1 day
Primary	Efflux ratio (with enzalutamide and positive control)	Difference in efflux ratio for edoxaban/ rivaroxaban / apixaban in the presence of enzalutamide and a positive control (e.g. verapamil, whilst ensuring appropriate statistical power)	Each experiment will be conducted over a period of <1 day
Secondary	Bleeding	Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (various types of bleeding or hemorrhage are listed. The most appropriate will be selected and graded 1-5 where Grade 1=Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated.; Grade 2=Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living.; Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living.; Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to adverse event	4 weeks
Secondary	Bruising	A finding of injury of the soft tissues or bone characterized by leakage of blood into surrounding tissues. Graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 1-2 where grade 1=localized or in a dependent area and grade 2 = generalize bruising	4 weeks
Secondary	Venous Thromboembolism	Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (various different thromboembolic events are listed. The most appropriate will be selected and graded 1-5 where Grade 1=Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated.; Grade 2=Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living.; Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living.; Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to adverse event	4 weeks