Clinical Trials Logo

Driving Pressure clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Driving Pressure.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04391387 Completed - Oxygenation Clinical Trials

Clinical Impact of Different Duration Prone Postition Treatment for Patients With ARDS.

Start date: July 9, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening disease, patients with ARDS usually need mechanical ventilation. The treatment of ARDS include low tidal volume ventilation, steroid, extracorporeal membraneous oxygenator, inhaled nitric oxide or prone position . Some studies showed prone position had beneficial effect of oxygenation and mortality for severe ARDS patients, the duration of prone position should be at least 10 hours. It is unknown the optimal duration of prone position which is better for severe ARDS patients. This study will compare the clinical differences of 16-hour and 24-hour prone position for severe ARDS patients.

NCT ID: NCT04260451 Completed - Clinical trials for Postoperative Complications

Driving Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Thoracic Surgery

Start date: March 2, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pulmonary complications are the most common complication in thoracic surgery and the leading cause of mortality.Therefore, lung protection is utmost important, and protective ventilation is strongly recommended in thoracic surgery. Protective ventilation is a prevailing ventilatory strategy in these days and is comprised of small tidal volume, limited inspiratory pressure, and application of positive end-expiratory pressure. However, several retrospective studies recently suggested that tidal volume, inspiratory pressure, and positive end-expiratory pressure are not related to patient outcomes, or only related when they influenced the driving pressure. Recently, the investigators reported the first prospective study about the driving pressure-guided ventilation in thoracic surgery. PEEP was titrated to bring the lowest driving pressure in each patient and applied throughout the one lung ventilation. The application of individualized PEEP reduced the incidence of pulmonary complications.However, that study was small size single center study with 312 patients. Thus, investigators try to perform large scale multicenter study. Through this study investigators evaluate that driving pressure-guided ventilation can reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications compared with conventional protective ventilation in thoracic surgery.

NCT ID: NCT04193254 Completed - Clinical trials for Mechanical Ventilation Complication

LPP , MP and DP:Relation With Mortality and SOFA in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in ER, Ward and ICU

LUMEDRI-MORT
Start date: September 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Prospective, observational, longitudinal study, September 2019 to March 2020 of all adult patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation treated at General Hospital of Zone 11 IMSS in Piedras Negras, Coahuila. The investigators aim to assess the relation of lung protective ventilation, mechanical power and driving pressure in mortality and SOFA of mechanically ventilated patients inside and outside ICU at the General Hospital of Zona 11 Piedras Negras, IMSS

NCT ID: NCT02851238 Completed - Clinical trials for One-Lung Ventilation

Driving Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

Start date: August 12, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to prove that driving pressure limited ventilation is superior in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications to existing protective ventilation.