Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
grip strength |
Grip strength (JA Preston, Corporation Jackson, MI, USA) was measured in method recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. The scale of the dynamometer indicated handgrip strength in kilograms (kg). The testing protocol consisted of three maximal voluntary isometric contractions maintained for 5 s, with rest period of at least 60 s; the highest value was used for the determination of the maximal grip strength. Participants standing, shoulder in a neutral position, arm by side, elbow fully extended. Specific verbal instructions were given to subjects before the evaluations and the experiments were performed with verbal encouragement. |
Conducted at the 6th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
grip strength |
Grip strength (JA Preston, Corporation Jackson, MI, USA) was measured in method recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. The scale of the dynamometer indicated handgrip strength in kilograms (kg). The testing protocol consisted of three maximal voluntary isometric contractions maintained for 5 s, with rest period of at least 60 s; the highest value was used for the determination of the maximal grip strength. Participants standing, shoulder in a neutral position, arm by side, elbow fully extended. Specific verbal instructions were given to subjects before the evaluations and the experiments were performed with verbal encouragement. |
Conducted at the 12th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
Pinch Strength |
Pinch strength (B&L Engineering, Sana Ana, CA) were measured in method recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. Participants were seated with their shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed to 90°, forearm in neutral position. Three measurements were made and the average value was used. |
Conducted at the 6th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
Pinch Strength |
Pinch strength (B&L Engineering, Sana Ana, CA) were measured in method recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. Participants were seated with their shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed to 90°, forearm in neutral position. Three measurements were made and the average value was used. |
Conducted at the 12th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
ROM of the wrist |
ROM of the wrist (wrist flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation; forearm supination and pronation) was measured by a goniometer in positions recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. Three measurements were made and the average value was used. |
Conducted at the 6th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
ROM of the wrist |
ROM of the wrist (wrist flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation; forearm supination and pronation) was measured by a goniometer in positions recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. Three measurements were made and the average value was used. |
Conducted at the 12th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
PRWE Score |
The PRWE is a region specific outcome measure that evaluates wrist-related disability. It contains 15 items: five of which evaluate pain (intensity and frequency) and 10 evaluate function (specific activities and usual activities). Participants are instructed to answer all questions by rating their average pain and level of function over the past week. To produce the function subscale score, the responses to the 10 functional items are tallied and divided by two. Adding the pain and function subscale scores produces the total PRWE score, where 0 is the best score (no pain or difficulty performing activities) and 100 is the worse score (severe continuous pain and unable to perform activities). |
Conducted at the 6th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
PRWE Score |
The PRWE is a region specific outcome measure that evaluates wrist-related disability. It contains 15 items: five of which evaluate pain (intensity and frequency) and 10 evaluate function (specific activities and usual activities). Participants are instructed to answer all questions by rating their average pain and level of function over the past week. To produce the function subscale score, the responses to the 10 functional items are tallied and divided by two. Adding the pain and function subscale scores produces the total PRWE score, where 0 is the best score (no pain or difficulty performing activities) and 100 is the worse score (severe continuous pain and unable to perform activities). |
Conducted at the 12th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
Muscle Stiffness |
Muscle stiffness (MyotonPRO, Myoton Ltd, Estonia) was measured in method recommended by the Ditroilo et al. Participants were required to expose their arms in the relaxed position. To maintain consistency of measurements among participants, marks were drawn on the skin in the following site on arm. Five consecutive measurements were taken. The average of the five measurements was used for later analysis. |
Conducted at the 6th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Primary |
Muscle Stiffness |
Muscle stiffness (MyotonPRO, Myoton Ltd, Estonia) was measured in method recommended by the Ditroilo et al. Participants were required to expose their arms in the relaxed position. To maintain consistency of measurements among participants, marks were drawn on the skin in the following site on arm. Five consecutive measurements were taken. The average of the five measurements was used for later analysis. |
Conducted at the 12th week from the date of initial gypsum immobilization. |
|
Secondary |
Radiographic outcomes |
Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (Kodak DR, DR Evolution, Eastman Kodak) were acquired at pre and post training as safety indicators. Radiographic outcomes were measured by doctors of the same profession. |
Conducted at 1th week(post injury). |
|
Secondary |
Radiographic outcomes |
Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (Kodak DR, DR Evolution, Eastman Kodak) were acquired at pre and post training as safety indicators. Radiographic outcomes were measured by doctors of the same profession. |
Conducted at 1th week(post reduction). |
|
Secondary |
Radiographic outcomes |
Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (Kodak DR, DR Evolution, Eastman Kodak) were acquired at pre and post training as safety indicators. Radiographic outcomes were measured by doctors of the same profession. |
Conducted at 6th week. |
|
Secondary |
Radiographic outcomes |
Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (Kodak DR, DR Evolution, Eastman Kodak) were acquired at pre and post training as safety indicators. Radiographic outcomes were measured by doctors of the same profession. |
Conducted at 12th week. |
|